Re: [RFC] Automatic 'make check' in CI

2020-11-22 Thread David Kastrup
Jonas Hahnfeld writes: > Nope, that was a red herring: The reason is that the footnote creation > process in footnote-volta-spanner.ly messes with (point-stencil), which > is used by skyline-point-extent.ly and also the BendSpanner. As far as > I understand the Stencil class, its objects are not

Re: [RFC] Automatic 'make check' in CI

2020-11-22 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2020, 21:12 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jonas Hahnfeld > wrote: > > footnote-volta-spanner.ly was added by > > commit c1f44faf958aafe7802f432a5ae0f4c74a8c0146 > > Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys > > Date:   Tue Jun 16 08:59:35 2020 +0200 > >

Re: [RFC] Automatic 'make check' in CI

2020-11-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Samstag, den 21.11.2020, 18:50 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > > Am Samstag, den 21.11.2020, 09:46 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > > > Am Freitag, den 20.11.2020, 17:55 -0500 schrieb Dan Eble: > > > > On Nov 20, 2020, at 12:22, Jonas

Re: [RFC] Automatic 'make check' in CI

2020-11-22 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2020, 09:56 -0500 schrieb Dan Eble: > On Nov 22, 2020, at 07:55, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > > > > I successfully traced this back to compiling, for example, footnote- > > volta-spanner.ly and skyline-point-extent.ly (in that order!) with an > > added '\include

Re: [RFC] Automatic 'make check' in CI

2020-11-22 Thread Dan Eble
On Nov 22, 2020, at 07:55, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > I successfully traced this back to compiling, for example, footnote- > volta-spanner.ly and skyline-point-extent.ly (in that order!) with an > added '\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"' (attached). If I run > $ ./out/bin/lilypond

Re: [RFC] Automatic 'make check' in CI

2020-11-22 Thread Dan Eble
On Nov 22, 2020, at 07:55, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > . . . had some concerns about Spanners that were dismissed on > the basis that there was no test case that showed wrong results (is > that really our standard for claiming that a change works correctly?!). To be fair, there are things in this

Re: [RFC] Automatic 'make check' in CI

2020-11-22 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Am Samstag, den 21.11.2020, 18:50 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > Am Samstag, den 21.11.2020, 09:46 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > > Am Freitag, den 20.11.2020, 17:55 -0500 schrieb Dan Eble: > > > On Nov 20, 2020, at 12:22, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > > > > Despite these shortcomings, I think it

PATCHES - Countdown for November 22nd

2020-11-22 Thread James Lowe
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on November 24th. A list of all merge requests can be found here: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?sort=label_priority Push: !516 Doc: Document debug-{slur,beam,tie}-scoring - Michael

Re: xdvipdfmx:fatal: Unable to find TFM file "latt1095".

2020-11-22 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Am Samstag, den 21.11.2020, 20:53 +0100 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > > > > What about explicitly creating them as a make prerequisite? > > > > > > If this is possible, we should certainly do this. > > Something like the attached (untested) patch should do. Please don't defeat all recent cleanups

Re: xdvipdfmx:fatal: Unable to find TFM file "latt1095".

2020-11-22 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld
Am Samstag, den 21.11.2020, 19:47 +0100 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > > > AFAIK, the TFM files (and even the master MF files) for the > > > Cyrillic LA font family are created on the fly.  What about > > > explicitly creating them as a make prerequisite? > > > > > >   mktextfm latt1095 > > >