Re: source file ... .scm newer than compiled ... .go file

2022-11-01 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 01/11/2022 à 23:58, Federico Bruni a écrit : Today I noticed that the current Frescobaldi flatpak (LilyPond 2.23.80) doesn't hang, but it always prints a wall of annoying messages like: [...] I though that disabling Scheme recompilation would have also stopped this check. Here's the PR

Re: source file ... .scm newer than compiled ... .go file

2022-11-01 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle 00:29:15 +0200, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Il giorno mer 12 ott 2022 alle 23:59:32 +0200, Federico Bruni ha scritto: I'll have to find a solution when building the flatpak. Waiting for minutes or hours while CPU hits 100% is not an option. For the records,

Re: texi2any upgrade: Is there a regtest showing the results needed?

2022-11-01 Thread Karlin High
On 11/1/2022 4:44 PM, Jean Abou Samra wrote: As Jonas said: you are welcome to work on this, but be prepared for a bumpy ride. Provided the expectations stay low and long-term, I have a pretty deep patience for whatever community process is needed along the way. Feedback like this regarding

Re: texi2any upgrade: Is there a regtest showing the results needed?

2022-11-01 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 01/11/2022 à 14:54, Karlin High a écrit : If not, does it seem like anything worth pursuing? Not to me, because the code to port is in our texi2html configuration file, not the Texinfo sources themselves. The basic Texinfo language is the same on both sides, it is the configuration that

Re: weird error engraving two files with 2.23.14

2022-11-01 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 01/11/2022 à 23:16, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : Some PDF metadata features are missing, IIRC. Off the top: -dembed-source-code, and PDF outlines. There are also some obscure font features like -dgs-load-lily-fonts.

Re: weird error engraving two files with 2.23.14

2022-11-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 1:28 PM Kevin Barry wrote: > > It works great using the cairo backend! > > I wanted to test it so I think I'll set it as default for all my scores. > > What are the current drawbacks? There's any page in the docs about cairo? > > It looks like there was some kind of mixup

Re: texi2any upgrade: Is there a regtest showing the results needed?

2022-11-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> With the start-afresh approach for lilypond-texi2html.init, it seems > to me the first thing that would be needed is a regtest or Minimal > Working Example of sorts: A concise texinfo file calling for each > feature or function needing equivalent replication in the upgrade. > > Once the

New French PO file for 'lilypond' (version 2.23.80)

2022-11-01 Thread Translation Project Robot
Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted by the French team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/fr.po (We can arrange things so

texi2any upgrade: Is there a regtest showing the results needed?

2022-11-01 Thread Karlin High
On 10/25/2022 4:00 PM, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > I think it may be better to rewrite the needed customizations more or > less from scratch. From a few preliminary tests some time ago, many > things will work very differently with texi2any; some customizations > won't be necessary anymore (because