Graham
I just came across this in my inbox and realised I hadn't replied to it.
Sorry.
You wrote Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:35 PM
Trevor, I modified LM 4.6.3 Other... a bit, but it's now a mess.
I didn't think that you'd introduced GUB,
That's right, it hasn't been mentioned.
so I
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, May 24, 2008 11:12 PM
On Sat, 24 May 2008 21:31:16 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, I'd drop the strong bits and simply use four paras like:
If you are using MS Windows (any flavour) and downloaded the
standard version of LilyPond from
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 25, 2008 9:50 AM
On Sun, 25 May 2008 09:40:47 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A list would be fine. What I disliked was the attempt to construct
a heading from the conditions. These are better explained in text.
An alternative would be a list
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 25, 2008 11:02 AM
Anyway, at this point we're just nitpicking; the exact terms and
order doesn't really matter. You know the issue now, so go ahead
and do whatever you think is best in tweaks.
OK. Pushed to master. Please tweak if any of this is wrong.
I've a vague suspicion this has been raised before; if so, apologies.
The description of the direction property in the IR is wrong in two places.
I think it should be corrected as follows (but I can't see where this is
specified):
direction (direction)
If side-axis is 1 (or #X), then this
Neil Puttock wrote Sunday, May 25, 2008 6:42 PM
2008/5/25 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[Delete the following - only 1,0,-1 are permitted
for type 'direction']
but also other numerical values are permitted.
Hmm, I hadn't noticed this; I was sure other values were possible, but
I
- Original Message -
From: Patrick McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: Renaming \setTextCresc, \setHairpinCresc, etc.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Valentin Villenave
[EMAIL
John, you wrote
Trevor, are sections in Input stabilized enough so we can reorganize
translations too? In fact, this chapter is not translated in any
language, except one or two nodes in French, so reorganization in
translations is very cheap for this chapter (no more than 10 minutes).
The
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, May 31, 2008 8:54 AM
On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:28:50 +0200
John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An unsure question is, should big doc work like GDP go on on master
after 2.12?
No, because barring a miracle, there won't be anybody[1] left to do
big doc work.
Graham Percival wrote Monday, June 02, 2008 9:01 PM
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:48:45 +0100
Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/1 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It wasn't me; I just reminded somebody to work on it.
If this uses 2.11 stuff (which I imagine it does, given the new
Chapter 3 in the Notation Reference is currently named Input syntax, but
the contents in the latest revision of the 2.11 docs are much wider than the
name implies and I'd like to change it. The trouble is, the contents are
rather diverse, being mainly the left-overs from chapters 1 2.
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:22 PM
quote
In the past, there has been a call for a full syntax diagram for LilyPond.
Such a diagram should come directly from the parser, IMO. Are there current
plans for developing one? At one time, I wrote a Python routine that
Valentin Villenave wrote Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:39 AM
2008/6/11 Risto Vääräniemi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess Windows (and Acrobat) handles files differently than Linux and
KPDF. Could you test on Linux what happens, if a pdf is opened with
Acrobat (Reader) and you re-compile the file?
Carl
I'll go along with that.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:20 AM
Subject: s vs. \skip
In rewriting the docs on rests, I've come across s and \skip as ways to
generate musical durations
Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:24 AM
I have just documented the new parenthesis style arpeggio bracket
that Han-Wen created a while back. Here is a link to the News item:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS
Since it involves two \override commands, it
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:14 AM
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:18:04 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:24 AM
I think an \arpeggioParen command might be suitable.
Looks good; it matches the existing \arpeggioBracket
Valentin Villenave wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:14 AM
BTW: May I take this as an opportunity to offer to also rename
sustainDown\Up into SustainOn\Off?
See my former mail on:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-04/msg00037.html
I'm in favour of this. Anyone who has
John Mandereau wrote Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:48 PM
Are you sure it's not possible to build LilyPond on Windows with MinGW?
AFAIK nobody has ever done it, but it's certainly possible, maybe with
some changes in the build system needed.
John, you shouldn't dangle tempations like that in
2. If not, how do we indicate the 5 states listed above?
\arpeggioNormal
\arpeggioPointUp
\arpeggioPointDown
\arpeggioBracket
\arpeggioParenthesis
Point is okay. Another possibility could be ArrowUp and
ArrowDown.
I like Arrow better.
Since the problem was with Up/Down maybe
Graham, you wrote
There's two months left in GDP. I'd like to reserve one month for
final clean-up and whatnot, so that leaves one month for the bulk
of the work.
Here's my list of what I'm hoping people to finish in July. If you
don't think you can accomplish it, let me know; I should be
I get the same problem. It seems the download host download.linuxaudio.org
(128.173.232.121) is down. It doesn't respond to a ping.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 6:47 AM
Subject: Downloading the install
Good name!
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lily-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:49 AM
Subject: NR 2.9 world music
I've added NR 2.9 World music. Currently it'll only contain
Arabic music, but
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:10 PM
This has nothing to do with translations -- this is just good
docs! I'd want these fixes even if we weren't translating
anything. :)
However, please send patches to me for review. I changed one
thing in your patch: there's no emphase
I just downloaded and installed 2.11.51-1 for Windows. It seems not to
include the new predefs introduced by Carl in commit
8efac4c75717d696ceee8f4c9899ead4abc2e5c5 on 5 July.
Why not?
Trevor
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
John
I take it back - the build is fine. Something funny must have happened
during my first install, as I've just re-installed 2.11.51-1 and everything
is as it should be. Sorry.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL
Hi Jean-Charles
I used simulating because this way of doing it is really rather a hack.
A bit like replacing a staccato note with a half-length note followed by
a half-length rest. Both methods render the required music more or
less correctly in MIDI.
Doing it for real would be for LilyPond to
Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote
Le 13.07.2008 18:26, Trevor Daniels disait :
Hi Jean-Charles
I used simulating because this way of doing it is really rather a hack.
A bit like replacing a staccato note with a half-length note followed by
a half-length rest. Both methods render the required
Graham
I use this snippet in NR 3.3.3 Text encoding. There's no real need to
display the lily code here, but it would be nice to continue to show the
lily output, which displays just fine in pdf. Are you willing to let me
drop verbatim here (with a suitable comment, of course)?
Trevor
Sorry for breaking the doc build again, Neil, and thanks for fixing it.
As I can't build the docs 'properly' under Windows I use texi2html to check
for errors, but it seems it doesn't flag up unmatched braces like the error
you just fixed:
For example, if a @notation{rinforzando} dynamic
Looks pretty good in general; a few minor suggestions in attached patch.
Also, I'd still like to change the heading, Input syntax to something
else. My current favourite is Other notation as this follows nicely after
the first two sections, rounding things off and providing a catch-all for
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, July 20, 2008 11:42 PM
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:22:45 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I'd still like to change the heading, Input syntax to
something else. My current favourite is Other notation as this
follows nicely after the first two
On IE 7 the left hand panel containing the index has both vertical and
horizontal scroll bars :) but no vertical scroll bar appears on the main
panel for the longer snippets, meaning there is no way to see the last part
of the snippet :(
Is this the known problem with IE that you mentioned
John Mandereau wrote Monday, July 21, 2008 9:43 PM
On 2008/07/21 00:37 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll have to find something - the section is certainly
not Input syntax!
I'd say either General notation or Non-musical notation,
leaning
Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 21, 2008 10:02 PM
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:43:15 +0200
John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008/07/21 00:37 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
I'd say either General notation or Non-musical notation,
leaning slightly towards the former. Anybody else
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:27 AM
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:54:24 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 21, 2008 10:02 PM
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:43:15 +0200
John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about General input
Graham
Do you have anyone available in the near future to tidy up NR 3? Refs,
index entries, snippets, policy, etc all need detailed attention. I think
the base information is fairly solid, but I've left a couple of hidden TODO
where there are questions or suggestions for improvement.
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:06 AM
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:54:42 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I should press on with NR 5 now. I'll try to get it into a
state suitable for 2.12 as quickly as possible, ie no worse than
2.10, but with lots of hidden
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, July 27, 2008 9:40 AM
Hi Trevor, Patick, Jonathan, Carl, Francisco, and Neil,
I'm now finished my thesis, course work, and everything I need to
get done until my thesis defense on Aug 19th.
That's really good - not many people have three weeks to spare!
Patrick
Further to this, I have just pushed a further change to NR 4 to git which
changed the section structuring in this chapter a little. Just in case you
have already started made local mods to spacing.itely.
Trevor
Patrick: please finish NR 1.3, 1.6, and then spend 2-3 hours on
the
John, you wrote
I finally begin to find little time to read and proofread post-GDP
docs, and I especially would like to proofread (not translate right
now) LM 3: there are some ends of sentences with cross-references
which look strangely phrased in Info output, and there are minor
errors like
Neil/Han-Wen
I cannot compile the docs locally as the LSR snippets were updated to
require 2.11.55 earlier today, but the latest release available is
2.11.54-1. Means I can't check my doc changes, which is a pain.
Trevor
___
lilypond-devel
2.11.55 to 2.11.54.
2) Comment out any syntax changes (ie \ottava)
3) Make sure you don't accidentally commit any of those changes.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:20:10 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil/Han-Wen
I cannot compile the docs locally as the LSR snippets were
Han-Wen
An old version of ly/arabic.ly was included in 2.11.55 which causes all
Arabic music to fail, including the examples in the NR. The correct version
was placed in git on 14 Jul, commit 305c5b9564dbd96b2aaaebc9035f85003a0140c4
Trevor
___
. But
deleting the directory before installing work OK. Strange. Maybe a quirk
in file caching or maybe a peculiarity of Vista. If it happens again I'll
investigate more carefully.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lily-Devel List lilypond-devel
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote
Yesterday, I did another another bugfixing round (the results of which
are in .55). I'll probably do another one to resolve the
tie/completion-heads issues, but after that, I think we're ready for
2.12. I think this will happen within a month.
OK. I'll try to get
not
correct?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lily-devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Patrick
McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jonathan Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED
Francisco
The LM's role (at least in my view) is to introduce concepts and
explanations in a logical order. It makes no attempt to be either rigorous
or comprehensive, neither should it. The NR's role, in contrast, is to
present complete and accurate facts, sweetened with a smattering of
]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lily-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: post-GDP doc team
Right, I've just tested your file using various \repeat unfold
settings, and each pdf has barlines under the stave at various points;
it seems you can't
.
The IR says the value should be between 0 and 2, but values outside this
range seem to work fine, even -ve values.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lily-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10
Mats, you wrote, Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:26 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
So, for the example in question, the NR should certainly state
categorically what the voice names are in the various constructs, and
examples showing the differences would be fine. But I don't think
there is any
Neil, you wrote Wednesday, August 06, 2008 8:45 PM
2008/8/6 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil
Further to this, I've just realised that 'layer takes a number, not an
integer, so the variable overprinting of grobs in the same layer could be
due to rounding. In effect we have an infinite
Hi Peter
Just tried your articulate.ly. Looks really promising! A couple of early
comments. It may be obvious, but \articulate should only be used in a
\score block with just \midi {} - it mucks up the printed output if used
with \layout { }. And dynamics in the midi score block must be
Carl
This isn't a problem specific to chordmode. If you use
an identifier c you get a similar error about unexpected
notename_pitch whatever the input mode. The problem is
the identifier m.
Because m is a valid chord modifier and the parser/lexer
is scanning for chordmodifiers or pitchnames
OK John - five patches pushed.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lily-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 5:23 PM
Subject: [PATCHES] Connected again but without Git pushing
Hi all,
Sorry for having disappeared for a
Carl
You may be right, but the details of the parser/lexer logic
have so far defeated me. As it's late and as I'm away most of
Saturday I shall withdraw, beaten, from this discussion :(
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL
John, you wrote Saturday, August 09, 2008 5:44 PM
2008/8/8 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK John - five patches pushed.
Thank you Trevor! For next time you apply Git patches, you may want
to try 'git am 000x-zzz', which preserves authoring info and create a
commit automatically.
Ah
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Saturday, August 09, 2008 1:11 PM
Am Montag, 28. Juli 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:56:30 -0600
Once I push changes to chords.itely, what triggers a new GDP build?
Me logging into kainhofer.com and running:
updatedocs.sh doclog.txt
I
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Monday, August 11, 2008 9:43 PM
As a solution I propose to remove the backslash from the node names and
the
xrefs, so links will work. They can/should stay in the section titles,
which
are not used for the links anyway. There they don't cause any errors
anyway.
Hi again Carl
Another major addition! The new fretboard additions are
very impressive! All very clearly and concisely
written except for one paragraph, which just confused
me:
2.4.1.4 Custom tablatures
I found the first paragraph less than clear, maybe
because I'm not familiar with tablature.
John, you wrote, Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:21 PM
2008/8/12 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John, there are lots of refs to this section. I
can find and change all the ones in the English
docs, but I'm not sure what to do about the
translations. Advice please.
You can do exactly the same
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote
Unfortunately, with our current way of using @rlearning etc, I don't know
any
way to get the links to show backslashes...
The @ref command has a third argument, which controls the displayed text,
but
our definitions in macros.texi don't use this third argument.
Patrick McCarty wrote Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:21 AM
I have a couple of questions regarding my section (NR 1.6):
*NR 1.6.2.1 Staff symbol
This section is describing every single way to modify the properties
of StaffSymbol. The only content that doesn't involve \override
commands is the
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:47 AM
Am Mittwoch, 13. August 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote
The only solution I see is to also define two-argument macros similar
to
@rlearning and the like, where the second argument gives the displayed
text
Neil, you wrote Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:58 PM
2008/8/7 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You're right. The value of 'layer is held as a real, but converted to an
integer before use. It seems all +ve and -ve integers are effective,
though, so we still have quite a few discrete layers
Rather than mel could you please use melody?
This make it easier for the translators.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Carl Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: finished second draft?
Francisco Vila paconet.org
Francisco wrote Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:05 AM
@lilypond [guote, verbatim, relative =1]
\new Staff {
\context Voice = mel {
c4
{
\voiceOne g' g
}
\new Voice {
\voiceTwo e e
}
\oneVoice
g
}
}
\new Lyrics
Carl
Why do you want a tied note to forbid a line break?
It is preferable that it permits it, surely?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LilyPond Development lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15,
ownership of the templates to Kieren so
he can edit them directly, or will he have to submit complete new ones via
you?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LilyPond Mailing
Carl
I think you're right. Looking at Beaming_pattern::find_rhythmic_importance
in beaming-pattern.cc, it seems that both beatLength and beatGrouping are
used together to determine the importance of stems. beatLength sets the
length of beats to be used in a beatGroup. I don't have time
As an alternative, I do all my local (doc)
changes in separate branches. When one is
ready to push I fetch and merge origin/master
into my local branch master, cherrypick the
commits I want to submit and push. It's
slightly more work, but means I can work
on several updates at the same time in
OK. I'll look at it.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lily-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 1:09 AM
Subject: percussion
Trevor,
I dumped a bit of info about percussion into MIDI. It'll need to
Graham
I've redrafted this to make it presentable but just left a TODO to expand
it, as I know nothing of percussion. I'll ask Stefan to check it out and
suggest any additions and/or examples. I'll push it as soon as I can
compile the NR to check my edits. The fretboard stuff is still
Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:58 AM
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If we start adding a lot of (occasional) contributors, I propose we
use the git.or.cz fork mechanism. People can then publish their
changes, and it's easy for
Ralph, you wrote Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:57 PM
Nice explanation, Trevor. It looks adequate to me, and certainly much
better
than what's there now. Can you suggest someone to whom I could make a
formal
request for a change in the description of the indices? I have neither the
authority to
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:42 PM
What did you intend to have happen when beatLength is changed? AFAICS,
\time 12/16 sets measureLength to (ly:make-moment 12 16) and beatLength to
(ly:make-moment 1 16). When a user sets beatLength to (ly:make-moment 1
8) it
says to me
Carl
I'm not competent to judge your patch but this sounds excellent!
When this arrived I was part-way through replying to your
previous email, which was to make the point that not all
combinations of the several parameters which control beaming
were necessarily compatible. There are many
Carl
I'm having difficulty running the NR through lilypond-book. It fails in
rhythms.itely on the first fretboard example. It's been failing in the same
way for a couple of earlier releases and I was hoping a later release would
fix it, but it still fails with 2.11.56 binary, so I've
know if none of this helps.
Very helpful - thanks.
Carl
Trevor
On 8/22/08 2:56 PM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl
I'm having difficulty running the NR through lilypond-book. It fails in
rhythms.itely on the first fretboard example. It's been failing in the
same
way
-
From: Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lily-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Unbound variable: parse-terse-string
On 8/23/08 2:45 AM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl, you wrote
Trevor Daniels wrote Saturday, August 23, 2008 11:16 PM
OK I think I understand what is happening here.
It's all to do with Vista's paranoia over security
and my attempts to compile the docs between GUB
releases. It's a long story ... and good fodder
for the anti-Vista brigade.
The Program
Neil
I have a problem checking my doc edits, which I like to do before pushing
them. I use the latest GUB binary, currently 2.11.56, to compile the docs,
but it conks on the snippets, which have already been up rated to require
2.11.57.
Any suggestions? Could I perhaps change something in
Mats Bengtsson wrote Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:53 PM
Neil Puttock wrote:
2008/8/24 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any suggestions? Could I perhaps change something in Lily to make her
think
she is already at the 2.11.57 level?
I don't think so; whenever the version changes
Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 25, 2008 10:45 AM
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a problem checking my doc edits, which I like to do before pushing
them. I use the latest GUB binary, currently 2.11.56, to compile the
docs,
but it conks
Ivo Bouwmans wrote Monday, August 25, 2008 1:54 PM
Graham wrote:
Excellent idea, Reinhold! I had planned on calling 2.12 Mao, but
naming it after Rune Zedeler is much better.
(or should the release name be Rune, dedicated to the memory of Rune
Zedeler?)
Rune would be very appropriate.
John Mandereau wrote Monday, August 25, 2008 5:53 PM
On 2008/08/25 16:48 +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Indeed so; dedicating Release 2.12 to Rune would be an excellent way of
showing our respect.
Where would the name be displayed? On the web site?
I like the title page of
the docs
Carl
Why not use an ellipse that just fits _inside_ the rectangle?
Then a^2/xrad^2 = 1; so xrad = a
and b^2/yrad^2 = 1; so yrad = b
The values of x-extent and y-extent of the grob are also given
immediately.
Trevor, puzzled ||%-/
- Original Message -
From: Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL
Carl D. Sorensen Friday, August 29, 2008 3:25 PM
On 8/29/08 2:03 AM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl
Why not use an ellipse that just fits _inside_ the rectangle?
Because the object of the ellipse is to circle a rectangle. The
rectangle
is a filled box, and the ellipse
Would you also propose the same for \notemode, \chordmode, \drummode and
\figuremode?
The present names are consistent.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:56 AM
Subject: \lyricsmode
Werner, you wrote September 02, 2008 9:31 AM
Would you also propose the same for \notemode, \chordmode, \drummode
and \figuremode? The present names are consistent.
`lyrics' is a plural word!
Yes, but lyric is a perfectly good word, both
as a noun and as an adjective. A lyric is a verse
Just to add a couple of points to this which may be helpful to
some.
Creating new branches is easy and does not have a high overhead.
I usually have several on the go, one for each self-contained change
or set of changes currently under development. This permits several
commits to be under
The GUB release 2.11.57 for Windows seems to have a problem on Vista SP1.
When started from the command line it returns immediately, even when given
no arguments - 2.11.56 is fine - it gives brief help information when given
no arguments. When started from another application like
- Original Message -
From: Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Bug-Lilypond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: 2.11.57 fails from Vista command line
2008/9/5 Trevor
Mark
Many thanks for the suggestion, and I agree it would be a useful addition to
the docs. However, the way we add examples which use overrides is via
snippets. If your suggestion is added to the LSR and tagged with
'repeats,docs' it will appear automatically in the Repeats snippet list
No one is working on NR 4 at the moment and, as it is not an area I'm
familiar with, I'd be very grateful if you could work on it. Thanks for the
offer :)
I'll copy to -dev to let others know.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Patrick McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels
Doc Team
I'd like to establish the present status of the 2.11 docs.
Could you all please confirm, update or extend the information below, which
covers the sections which I believe are currently under active(?) editing.
I'll then summarise the status of each of the sections so we can see what
OK thanks, Andrew. I'll pass that on to Ralph
for indexing.
Are you up for more doc work?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Hawryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lily-devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Jonathan Kulp
Doc Team
I've been fiddling with the Documentation Coordination page that John set up
at
http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Documentation_coordination
It looks like it will be useful, but there is more to do yet. Unfortunately
I shall be away for a week from tomorrow, almost
Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 8:27 PM
Are you up for more doc work?
Trevor
Yes, I'm up for more. I'm a slow doc writer, but I'm willing. :)
Great! What sort of work would you like? There are
a few sections that still need fairly major revision
and editing; there are some
Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 9:02 PM
I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
tell if they make sense to someone that doesn't compile their own
LilyPond binaries over breakfast.
OK,
Carl D. Sorensen Friday, September 12, 2008 9:13 PM
On 9/12/08 2:10 PM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 9:02 PM
I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could
901 - 1000 of 1527 matches
Mail list logo
