passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5039043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests - I get differences but they look ok
see:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1898#c1
http://codereview.appspot.com/5030053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hello, passes make but fails make check
please see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1891#c1
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 2011/09/16 21:31:25, J_lowe wrote:
Hello, passes make but fails make check
Sorry ignore this, I just realised I made a mistake in my make check.
I'll redo now.
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests. I did get the 'NOT A BUG' test show up again,
I see that I had had this before...so this looks ok.
See: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1854#c1
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4387046/
___
I was able to do a full make doc with no errors.
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4908041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests (with other patch applied first and this one
on top)
http://codereview.appspot.com/5032041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5027042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Fails make
--snip--
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
?: 0* [primitive-load-path documentation-generate.scm]
In
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/documentation-generate.scm:
72: 1* [display ...
73: 2* [identifiers-doc-string]
In
Passes make, a full make doc and reg tests.
Output of NR example attached here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1822#c5
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4912041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4908041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and new reg test differences (look ok) attached here
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1839#c17
http://codereview.appspot.com/4639065/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 2011/09/15 21:41:27, Neil Puttock wrote:
For some reason, your patch fails `make check' on my system.
Neil, I've just applied this patch - after seeing your note - to the
latest 'git pull -r' and 'make ; make check' work fine on my system if
that helps?
James
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5019042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests - there are three reg tests that show up but
nothing significant.
See http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1883#c1
http://codereview.appspot.com/4962072/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Thought I'd commented on this one but see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1839#c13
There are the reg test differences.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4639065/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Thought I'd commented on this one but see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1839#c13
There are the reg test differences.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4639065/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Passes make and I get a few reg test differences.
See
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1814#c10
for attachments,
http://codereview.appspot.com/4986042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Passes make. There is one reg test that shows up that I don't understand
the significance of but it looks ok. Attached in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1780#c14
http://codereview.appspot.com/4974078/
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Passes make test but fails reg test check.
See:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1572#c7
for more information
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4981052/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
New patch uploaded with corrected snippet edit
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4969069/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make but fails reg test check:
see http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=380#c15
for details (keeps the noise down here)
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951073/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4991049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4991044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4974075/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
patch 2 passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951073/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I created
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1873
and called it
'Added glyphs for Kievan Notation'
so when this issue is changed can we use the same title?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4996044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Added http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1878
http://codereview.appspot.com/4974075/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Added to Tracker:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1873
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4950071/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=814#c10
Labels: -Priority-Low Needs-policy
(just for information on this issue)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4890045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Passes make and reg tests.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4956062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Patch no longer applies to current tree
http://codereview.appspot.com/4908041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes Make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4904049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes Make but I get a lot of (probably expected) reg test differences.
Attached the most significant shifts here
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1856#c9
(as a zip containing about 30 pngs)
james
http://codereview.appspot.com/4964059/
new patch passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make, some trivial reg test differences but one is very different
and I have attached it here
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1855#c3
for comparison. Otherwise looks ok.
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/
___
Passes make and reg test shows one change see attached on
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=11#c14
probably expected.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4941041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
sses make and reg tests and I ran a make doc too (seemed relevant) and
it failed
--snip--
tal error: failed files: 78/lily-63af708e.ly
fatal error: Children (3) exited with errors.
command failed: /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/bin/lilypond
-dbackend=eps --formats=ps,png,pdf -djob-count=7
Passes make but get two reg tests show up that look ok but that need a
second opinion.
Attached on
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1854#c1
http://codereview.appspot.com/4387046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Mike, passes make but during reg test check i get
--snip--
Failed files: (6c/lily-5110fb03.ly)
fatal error: Children (3) exited with errors.
command failed: /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/bin/lilypond -I
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/input/regression/ -I ./out-test -I
Patch fails on tree as of 28 August.
patching file scm/music-functions.scm
Hunk #2 FAILED at 415.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
scm/music-functions.scm.rej
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/lilypond-git$
http://codereview.appspot.com/4387046/
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4819064/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4868046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests - one difference in reg test that is expected
and attached for completeness here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=723#c4
http://codereview.appspot.com/4966042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
passes make and reg tests.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Mike I get a failed patch apply here on the current tre (28 Aug)
--snip--
patching file lily/beam.cc
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1865 (offset 72 lines).
patching file lily/include/beam.hh
Hunk #1 succeeded at 69 with fuzz 2.
patching file lily/include/stem-tremolo.hh
patching file lily/include/stem.hh
Still passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636081/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4893044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
When I try to patch to current tree (27 Aug) I get
--snip--
patching file lily/part-combine-iterator.cc
Hunk #2 succeeded at 138 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 390.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 412.
2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
lily/part-combine-iterator.cc.rej
patching file
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4931043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
patching today's tree (27 Aug) I get
--snip--
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/lilypond-git$ patch -p1
../Desktop/issue224052_2001.diff
patching file input/regression/figured-bass-continuation-center.ly
patching file input/regression/figured-bass-figureorder-position.ly
patching file
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4923048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4921050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ok, this passes make but I get a lot of reg tests show up but I cannot
see any diffs at all (i.e no 'green' shadows that indicate the changes).
Either it's unbelievably subtle or something else is triggering the reg
tests to show up. They are to big to post them all here but he diffs
that show up
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4894052/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4961041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4672059/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/08/08 22:09:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM
Although I'm not sure about editing the other language files. Best
wait for
Francisco to comment.
Francisco, can you tell me if this patch is ok to go as I have touched
some of the translated docs to remove this snippet.
Thanks
On 2011/08/08 22:09:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM
Although I'm not sure about editing the other language files. Best
wait for
Francisco to comment.
Francisco, can you tell me if this patch is ok to go as I have touched
some of
the translated docs to remove this snippet.
Thank
Passes Make and there are some reg test differences - see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1328#c2
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make but there are some reg test differences
see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=804#c6
http://codereview.appspot.com/4854049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
minor stuff.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1659041/diff/16001/Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely
File Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1659041/diff/16001/Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely#newcode225
Reviewers: Trevor Daniels,
Message:
Second draft,
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4850051/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely
File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4850051/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1304
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4822046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808074/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg test diff looks ok
see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=509#c4
for attached png
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Draft 5 - removed all translation docs with this snippet in it too (for
when it is removed from LSR).
have at it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/diff/15001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
On 2011/08/05 10:07:46, Janek Warchol wrote:
2011/8/4 reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com:
I would definitely mention here that the automatic beaming
and the beam subdivisions are automatically derived from nbsp;the
\compound
meter.
Are the subdivisions really used?
...
I have removed the
New Draft.
Thanks
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/diff/9001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1554
a 'while you're there' nitpick.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808074/diff/18/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely
File Documentation/notation/vocal.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808074/diff/18/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely#newcode612
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely:612:
New Draft.
Before I push this (and as Neil has just done an LSR update) do I still
need to run makelsr.py before applying this patch once it has been
approved?
I have removed one snippet from both dirs (snippets/new and snippets).
I'll get someone to remove the snippet from the LSR too.
Pass make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4801083/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
make fails.
--snip--
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG -I/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/lily/include
-I./out -I/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/flower/include -I../flower/./out
-I../flower/include -I/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/lily/out -O2
-finline-functions -g -pipe -pthread -I/usr/include/freetype2 -pthread
Passes make and one reg test difference
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=163#c23
see attached there.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4810072/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4830064/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Second Draft. Hopefully I've covered everything without being too
verbose or talking through the code.
I also found some old 'scheme' code in the glossary and so updated that
with the new \compoundMeter function instead also removed another
reference to the snippet found in world.itely.
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4832046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Patch ready for review.
But also see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776#c6
as there are still some points I am not clear on on this function that
may need more doc additions.
Description:
Doc: Added \compoundMeter function to NR
Tracker 1776.
Hello, makes ok but during eg check I get:
--snip--
reading input/regression/out-test/tablature-tie-spanner-1.signature
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line
1261, in module
main ()
File
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
Pushed as
Commit 23cdda9506931d5b9a1e75ee8be8be8b74f9084a7c0
James
Description:
Doc: Usage - new option for lilypond-book
Documenting new feature made in
Commit 23cdda9506931d5b9a1e75ee8be8be8b74f9084a7c0
Also for Tracker issue 1730 adding information
Passes Make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4800051/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes Make and reg tests
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792#c1
http://codereview.appspot.com/4293054/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes Make and there is a reg test difference which looks ok. I created
a tracker
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1794
so people can see this but also because this has been going on for a
while and the tracker will at least keep this on people's radars.
On 2011/07/31 20:10:30, J_lowe wrote:
Passes Make and there is a reg test difference which looks ok. I
created a
tracker
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1794
so people can see this but also because this has been going on for a
while and
the tracker will at least keep
On 2011/07/30 16:15:39, c_sorensen_byu.edu wrote:
I think that the stop/start staves is currently exactly what it should
do.
It stops the staff at a location, and starts the staff at the same
location.
It reflects the commands that have been issued. If the staff is
continuous,
there is
passes make and reg tests look fine.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4809057/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Doesn't pass a make check.
I get an error on
regression/fret-diagrams-string-thickness.ly
log file shows:
Renaming input to:
`/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/input/regression/fret-diagrams-string-thickness.ly'
Interpreting music... ERROR: In procedure ly:pitch-transpose:
ERROR: Wrong type argument
Passes make and reg tests all ok. No errors reported.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4807053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg test.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4822055/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
make passes and no reg tests differences
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636081/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/07/29 11:35:55, J_lowe wrote:
Mike's new addition to footnotes doesn't affect this patch so I would
like to
get this pushed and when Mike comes back with more explanation for his
newer
patch which will then take more reviewing I can update the
documentation with
the additions than
Mike's new addition to footnotes doesn't affect this patch so I would
like to get this pushed and when Mike comes back with more explanation
for his newer patch which will then take more reviewing I can update the
documentation with the additions than hold this back.
note from Mike
--snip--
I just pushed a patch for automatic footnotes. Everything you need to
know about them exists in the two new regtests
(233aad0ba9781e43424c4e77a859e42b660210e6). The most important thing to
note is that, if people want to use non-automatic footnotes, they must
now add
801 - 900 of 1043 matches
Mail list logo