Re: Allow Scheme/identifiers for duration multipliers (issue 346810043 by d...@gnu.org)

2018-05-23 Thread tdanielsmusic
The proposed documentation looks fine to me. Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/346810043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Allow Scheme/identifiers for duration multipliers (issue 346810043 by d...@gnu.org)

2018-05-22 Thread dak
Reviewers: thomasmorley651, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, Message: On 2018/05/22 21:05:59, thomasmorley651 wrote: From description and regtest: very nice. Will it work for below as well? #(define frac (inexact->exact (/ 3.0 4.0))) { r1*/frac } As written no, but it depends on what you

Re: Allow Scheme/identifiers for duration multipliers (issue 346810043 by d...@gnu.org)

2018-05-22 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
LGreatTM! You have a way af making changes to the parser seem obvious, when they wouldn't have even crossed my mind. Thank you for all your hard work to rationalize the parser so that things like this can be done. https://codereview.appspot.com/346810043/

Allow Scheme/identifiers for duration multipliers (issue 346810043 by d...@gnu.org)

2018-05-22 Thread thomasmorley65
From description and regtest: very nice. Will it work for below as well? #(define frac (inexact->exact (/ 3.0 4.0))) { r1*/frac } https://codereview.appspot.com/346810043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org