Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-20 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 19/07/2017 à 14:48, David Kastrup a écrit : Federico Bruni writes: Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup ha scritto: Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk", it would make sense to

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-19 Thread David Kastrup
Dan Eble writes: >> On Jul 19, 2017, at 15:19, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Paul > writes: >> >>> It's usually `a = b` or `\a b` but not `\a = b` or `\a b = c`. >> >> You can only use markup functions when

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-19 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 20.07.2017 00:45, Dan Eble wrote: On Jul 19, 2017, at 15:19, David Kastrup wrote: Paul > writes: It's usually `a = b` or `\a b` but not `\a = b` or `\a b = c`. You can only use markup functions when refered to in markup

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-19 Thread Dan Eble
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 15:19, David Kastrup wrote: > > Paul > writes: > >> It's usually `a = b` or `\a b` but not `\a = b` or `\a b = c`. > > You can only use markup functions when refered to in markup mode, so it > makes sense

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-19 Thread David Kastrup
Paul writes: > On 07/17/2017 02:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not >> keeping up with things all the best), so the time seems convenient. > > No objections here. What's the latest thinking/status for

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-19 Thread Paul
On 07/17/2017 02:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not keeping up with things all the best), so the time seems convenient. No objections here. What's the latest thinking/status for issue 3884? Anything I can / should do?

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-19 Thread David Kastrup
Federico Bruni writes: > Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup ha > scritto: >> Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and >> their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk", >> it would make sense to only

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-18 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup ha scritto: Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk", it would make sense to only translate stuff in the stable 2.20 branch in the

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-18 Thread Trevor Daniels
Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:07 AM > Subject: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20? > No objections from me towards aiming for a 2.20 stable release. None from me either. Trevor --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com

Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-18 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 7:14 PM Subject: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20? Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not keeping up with things

Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

2017-07-17 Thread David Kastrup
Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not keeping up with things all the best), so the time seems convenient. There are a few "critical" bugs outstanding, the "Changes" document should be reordered to be systematic rather than in reverse time order, and I'd want to