Le 19/07/2017 à 14:48, David Kastrup a écrit :
Federico Bruni writes:
Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and
their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk",
it would make sense to
Dan Eble writes:
>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 15:19, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Paul > writes:
>>
>>> It's usually `a = b` or `\a b` but not `\a = b` or `\a b = c`.
>>
>> You can only use markup functions when
On 20.07.2017 00:45, Dan Eble wrote:
On Jul 19, 2017, at 15:19, David Kastrup wrote:
Paul > writes:
It's usually `a = b` or `\a b` but not `\a = b` or `\a b = c`.
You can only use markup functions when refered to in markup
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 15:19, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Paul > writes:
>
>> It's usually `a = b` or `\a b` but not `\a = b` or `\a b = c`.
>
> You can only use markup functions when refered to in markup mode, so it
> makes sense
Paul writes:
> On 07/17/2017 02:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not
>> keeping up with things all the best), so the time seems convenient.
>
> No objections here. What's the latest thinking/status for
On 07/17/2017 02:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not
keeping up with things all the best), so the time seems convenient.
No objections here. What's the latest thinking/status for issue 3884?
Anything I can / should do?
Federico Bruni writes:
> Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup ha
> scritto:
>> Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and
>> their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk",
>> it would make sense to only
Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup ha
scritto:
Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and
their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk", it
would make sense to only translate stuff in the stable 2.20 branch in
the
Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:07 AM
> Subject: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?
> No objections from me towards aiming for a 2.20 stable release.
None from me either.
Trevor
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 7:14 PM
Subject: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?
Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not
keeping up with things
Currently there is a bit of a lull (not entirely graceful due to me not
keeping up with things all the best), so the time seems convenient.
There are a few "critical" bugs outstanding, the "Changes" document
should be reordered to be systematic rather than in reverse time order,
and I'd want to
11 matches
Mail list logo