Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-12 Thread Mark Polesky
Joe, all votes are in except yours, which is kind of a moot point anyway, since (if you're still up for it) you'll be the one actually making this change: 1) basic-distanceminimum-distance 2) initial-distanceminimum-distance 3) basic-separation minimum-separation 4)

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-08 Thread Alexander Kobel
On 2010-11-07 16:30, Mark Polesky wrote: [...] SPACE MINIMUM-DISTANCE -- -- 1) basic-distanceminimum-distance 2) initial-distanceminimum-distance 3) basic-separation minimum-separation 4) initial-separation minimum-separation

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Sunday, November 07, 2010 12:46 AM Carl Sorensen wrote: 9) initial-separation * longer but describes the meaning more accurately now we have an item-item-spacing format I vote for 8 or 9. 9. Does this entail changing 'minimum-distance to 'minimum-separation?

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Mark Polesky
After polling some of you individually, the clear winner is to change the 'space key to 'basic-distance. Joe, can you take it from here? Thanks all. - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Trevor Daniels
:59 AM Subject: Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key After polling some of you individually, the clear winner is to change the 'space key to 'basic-distance. Joe, can you take it from here? Thanks all. - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Mark, since you were the only one to vote for this openly and Carl, Alexander and I didn't (well, Carl did initially, then changed his mind) perhaps you need to be a little more open about the voting process or

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Mark Polesky
Trevor Daniels wrote: Mark, since you were the only one to vote for this openly and Carl, Alexander and I didn't (well, Carl did initially, then changed his mind) perhaps you need to be a little more open about the voting process or you'll have Valentin after you :) Since you chose to have

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: But you're right; I was wrong to resort to backroom politics. Backroom politics? And here I was, thinking private discussions were a normal and legitimate part of a project's life... :) Here's your list with my humble

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: All right, hopefully everyone here won't mind one last vote, so please state your preference among the following:        SPACE          MINIMUM-DISTANCE   --  -- 1)   basic-distance    

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander: Carl: David: 1 Joe: Mark: 1 Trevor: Valentin: 2 -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Sunday, November 07, 2010 3:30 PM All right, hopefully everyone here won't mind one last vote, so please state your preference among the following: SPACE MINIMUM-DISTANCE -- -- 1) basic-distanceminimum-distance 2)

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-07 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/7/10 1:03 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: All right, hopefully everyone here won't mind one last vote, so please state your preference among the following:        SPACE          MINIMUM-DISTANCE  

Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Polesky
7 proposals for renaming the 'space alist-key have been discussed, but a decision has not yet been made. And I just added an 8th proposal (initial-distance). The discussion began with the 7 posts starting here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-10/msg00085.html

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/6/10 11:32 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: 7 proposals for renaming the 'space alist-key have been discussed, but a decision has not yet been made. And I just added an 8th proposal (initial-distance). To recap, I think the arguments *for* each of these are mostly

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-06 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, November 06, 2010 5:32 PM 7 proposals for renaming the 'space alist-key have been discussed, but a decision has not yet been made. And I just added an 8th proposal (initial-distance). To recap, I think the arguments *for* each of these are mostly self-evident

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/6/10 5:38 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, November 06, 2010 5:32 PM 7) basic-distance 8) initial-distance I vote for either 7 or 8. What about you? 9) initial-separation * longer but describes the meaning more accurately now

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-06 Thread Alexander Kobel
On 2010-11-06 18:32, Mark Polesky wrote: 7 proposals for renaming the 'space alist-key have been discussed, but a decision has not yet been made. And I just added an 8th proposal (initial-distance). [...] 2) optimal-distance * sounds like the resulting trade-off between the desired

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Polesky
Carl Sorensen wrote: 9) initial-separation * longer but describes the meaning more accurately now we have an item-item-spacing format I vote for 8 or 9. 9. Does this entail changing 'minimum-distance to 'minimum-separation? I prefer both to use the same noun. - Mark

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/6/10 6:46 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: Carl Sorensen wrote: 9) initial-separation * longer but describes the meaning more accurately now we have an item-item-spacing format I vote for 8 or 9. 9. Does this entail changing 'minimum-distance to