Re: Stable release proposal

2012-01-17 Thread Janek Warchoł
2012/1/17 Carl Sorensen : > So after hearing from most of the currently-active developers, I think a > reasonable goal for 2.16 would be [...]: > > 4) Have a minimum two-week testing period with no new features -- only > bugfixes. Looks like something i can help with. I'll begin updating my lily

Re: Stable release proposal

2012-01-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Normally, a route to a stable release means a code freeze, applying >> only fixes to problems within the code. This also means that no >> new bug fixes get applied. Are we going to do the same? > > I think Werner means fix only things that are not working as > advertised, but defer fixes tha

Re: Stable release proposal

2012-01-17 Thread David Kastrup
"Trevor Daniels" writes: > Carl, Although I'm not a current developer, I'd like to comment. > > In general I agree, but with the caveats below: > > Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:27 AM > > >> So after hearing from most of the currently-active developers, I think a >> reasonable g

Re: Stable release proposal

2012-01-17 Thread Trevor Daniels
Carl, Although I'm not a current developer, I'd like to comment. In general I agree, but with the caveats below: Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:27 AM So after hearing from most of the currently-active developers, I think a reasonable goal for 2.16 would be: 1) Work through

Re: Stable release proposal

2012-01-17 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/1/17 Carl Sorensen : > 5) Remove translations if they are not updated to 2.16.  The 2.14/2.15 > manuals can be used if desired.  Having non-updated manuals removed may > serve as an incentive to get them all translated. I partially agree but removing translations is very difficult and time co

Re: Stable release proposal

2012-01-16 Thread Keith OHara
Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes: > I think a reasonable goal for 2.16 would be: > > 1) Work through the outstanding issues involved in issue 2070 A stable version should not wait for this. This issue removes an obstacle to further clean-up of the input syntax, as explained a bit more under iss

Stable release proposal

2012-01-16 Thread Carl Sorensen
So after hearing from most of the currently-active developers, I think a reasonable goal for 2.16 would be: 1) Work through the outstanding issues involved in issue 2070 -- Don't wrap EventChord around all note heads. This is probably a big issue, but I think with David working on it it will hap