accordion glyph changes

2010-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
Is this a good change? Cheers, - Graham From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Percival gperc...@gperciva-desktop.(none) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:16:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Doc: update accordion glyphs. --- Documentation/notation/text.itely |8

Re: accordion glyph changes

2010-10-04 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: Is this a good change? Cheers, - Graham From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Should think so. How did I overlook that? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel

Re: accordion glyph changes

2010-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: Is this a good change? Cheers, - Graham From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Should think so.  How did I overlook that? Judging from the

Re: accordion glyph changes

2010-10-04 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 10/4/10 11:18 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Is this a good change? Yes. convert-ly should have made these changes automatically, I think. Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: accordion glyph changes

2010-10-04 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: Is this a good change? Cheers, - Graham From f021b1f3fa3a696a132dcdd6e27005c95e27176f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Should think

Re: accordion glyph changes

2010-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:30 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Ah, I think I remember that somebody told me that the important thing was the convert-ly rule, and that the automatic procedures would take care of the rest. That makes sense. Yes, those changes came from convert-ly. I'll push