> Remember: We used the hardcoded name "Emmentaler" at various places
> for --bigpdfs, and --use-encodings still needs and uses that portion
> of the old code.
Before remembering something, I need to know it in the first place.
Sounds like something we should get rid off in the long run.
On 2017/09/26 20:26:36, knupero wrote:
> Regarding the naming of the option, I'd prefer to have something
> oriented around the actual use characteristics rather than the
> internal details.
>
> Does that sound like something you can agree with?
Yes. That sounds reasonable.
If you know a
On 2017/09/26 22:19:27, dak wrote:
> If you know a better name for the option I'd happy to start sed.
--final-output ? --flatten-fonts ? Not sure about the inversions of
those,
however.
Somehow, concisely say "get-rid-of-anything-extra" versus
"keep-everything-that-comes?"
--min-fonts
Am 26.09.2017 um 14:13 schrieb Ken Sharp:
At 11:24 25/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
Thanks to the ghostscript community for your great tool and your patience!
Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no longer
a showstopper for you ?
We do not need
"James" writes:
> Hello,
>
> Sourceforge appears to be down at the moment so I am unable to process
> all the trackers that are in progress this evening. I am therefore
> having to postpone the countdown until tomorrow.
Ah, that explains why Slashdot is down also. Probably all
At 18:05 26/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no
longer a showstopper for you ?
We do not need PDFDontUseFontObjectNum any longer. It's removal is not a
showstopper.
Thanks for the confirmation!
We've run across a
Hello,
Sourceforge appears to be down at the moment so I am unable to process all the
trackers that are in progress this evening. I am therefore having to postpone
the countdown until tomorrow.
Regards
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
At 11:24 25/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
Thanks to the ghostscript community for your great tool and your patience!
Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no
longer a showstopper for you ?
We're planning to do a second release candidate 'real soon now'
On 2017/09/25 22:17:41, knupero wrote:
On 2017/09/25 17:33:47, dak wrote:
> I see. Still using -dgs-never-embed-fonts _without_
> --use-encodings seems like the most unusual combination, so I'd
> prefer if one had to explicitly switch encodings _off_ rather than
> _on_.
So you are
> Somehow, concisely say "get-rid-of-anything-extra" versus
> "keep-everything-that-comes?"
>
> --min-fonts and --max-fonts
> --compress-fonts and --expand-fonts
I would rather prefer --compress-fonts and --no-compress-fonts. This
is easier to remember (and rather common in GNU packages).
>
10 matches
Mail list logo