Re: Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts (issue 325630043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2017-09-26 Thread knupero
> Remember: We used the hardcoded name "Emmentaler" at various places > for --bigpdfs, and --use-encodings still needs and uses that portion > of the old code. Before remembering something, I need to know it in the first place. Sounds like something we should get rid off in the long run.

Re: Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts (issue 325630043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2017-09-26 Thread dak
On 2017/09/26 20:26:36, knupero wrote: > Regarding the naming of the option, I'd prefer to have something > oriented around the actual use characteristics rather than the > internal details. > > Does that sound like something you can agree with? Yes. That sounds reasonable. If you know a

Re: Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts (issue 325630043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2017-09-26 Thread karlinhigh
On 2017/09/26 22:19:27, dak wrote: > If you know a better name for the option I'd happy to start sed. --final-output ? --flatten-fonts ? Not sure about the inversions of those, however. Somehow, concisely say "get-rid-of-anything-extra" versus "keep-everything-that-comes?" --min-fonts

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-26 Thread Knut Petersen
Am 26.09.2017 um 14:13 schrieb Ken Sharp: At 11:24 25/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: Thanks to the ghostscript community for your great tool and your patience! Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no longer a showstopper for you ? We do not  need

Re: PATCHES - Countdown Postponed until tomorrow

2017-09-26 Thread David Kastrup
"James" writes: > Hello, > > Sourceforge appears to be down at the moment so I am unable to process > all the trackers that are in progress this evening. I am therefore > having to postpone the countdown until tomorrow. Ah, that explains why Slashdot is down also. Probably all

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-26 Thread Ken Sharp
At 18:05 26/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no longer a showstopper for you ? We do not need PDFDontUseFontObjectNum any longer. It's removal is not a showstopper. Thanks for the confirmation! We've run across a

PATCHES - Countdown Postponed until tomorrow

2017-09-26 Thread James
Hello, Sourceforge appears to be down at the moment so I am unable to process all the trackers that are in progress this evening. I am therefore having to postpone the countdown until tomorrow. Regards James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-26 Thread Ken Sharp
At 11:24 25/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: Thanks to the ghostscript community for your great tool and your patience! Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no longer a showstopper for you ? We're planning to do a second release candidate 'real soon now'

Re: Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts (issue 325630043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2017-09-26 Thread dak
On 2017/09/25 22:17:41, knupero wrote: On 2017/09/25 17:33:47, dak wrote: > I see. Still using -dgs-never-embed-fonts _without_ > --use-encodings seems like the most unusual combination, so I'd > prefer if one had to explicitly switch encodings _off_ rather than > _on_. So you are

Re: Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts (issue 325630043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2017-09-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Somehow, concisely say "get-rid-of-anything-extra" versus > "keep-everything-that-comes?" > > --min-fonts and --max-fonts > --compress-fonts and --expand-fonts I would rather prefer --compress-fonts and --no-compress-fonts. This is easier to remember (and rather common in GNU packages). >