Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2020, 14:59 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to ask what it would take in principle to branch stable/2.22
> > and what others think about this.
>
> I don't see that this is a good point of time.
>
> There has been an
Hi all,
I'd like to ask what it would take in principle to branch stable/2.22
and what others think about this.
Personally I'm convinced that creating the branch and only picking bug
fixes from master is the only guaranteed way to stabilize. Now you
might say that there were only few unstable
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to ask what it would take in principle to branch stable/2.22
> and what others think about this.
I don't see that this is a good point of time.
There has been an influx of badly tested changes to the build system and
directory setup and the web
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 1:58 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> I'd like to ask what it would take in principle to branch stable/2.22
> and what others think about this.
>
> Personally I'm convinced that creating the branch and only picking bug
> fixes from master is the only guaranteed way to stabilize.
Hi,
(Sorry about the strange reply style.)
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 1:58 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> I'd like to ask what it would take in principle to branch stable/2.22
> and what others think about this.
>
> Personally I'm convinced that creating the branch and only picking bug
> fixes from
On Aug 23, 2020, at 17:44, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> At least four areas are currently under flux: Python scripts, the build
> system, Guile 2 support, and fonts (Owen's project), and I don't see that
> master is coming any close to stability. I think we are better with focusing
> on these
