On 1/16/12 9:26 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Before you start thinking about pushing a patch to staging, you
need to ensure you have the correct local branches up to date.
One time only, edit the .git/config file to look like this (there
will be other lines and sections, don't
I've been thinking more about the previous conversation about stable
releases and coordinating work.
David seemed unhappy with the idea of a stable release happening once we
got to zero critical issues. My interpretation of his comments was that,
while zero critical issues may be a necessary
So after hearing from most of the currently-active developers, I think a
reasonable goal for 2.16 would be:
1) Work through the outstanding issues involved in issue 2070 -- Don't
wrap EventChord around all note heads. This is probably a big issue, but
I think with David working on it it will
On 1/21/12 9:45 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:27:00PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I would very much prefer the work on Issue 2240 (aka 2070) to make it
into 2.16. It is a significant API change that should not occur during
a stable release
On 1/21/12 10:24 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:02:32PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 1/21/12 9:45 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
IMO, significant API changes should not happen right before a
release. Version numbers
On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers
appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_
listened to (likely by the tabstaff engraver team), the rhythmic music
iterator _does_ broadcast them
On 1/21/12 11:16 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers
appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_
On 1/21/12 11:47 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
I must admit that I am lost here and do not quite understand what's
going on,
but will there be any difference between
c\3 e\2 g\1 and c e g\3\2\1
once these changes are implemented?
The latter would not display anything anywhere.
On 1/21/12 5:36 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/21 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello
On 21 January 2012 21:12, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Some questions and concerns.
While I don't understand any of this really, isn't lily-git.tcl
supposed to be for git-idiots
On 1/27/12 5:27 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Possibly I am just paranoid about the transpose problem: people can
likely accept that { c e g \transpose c d { q } } does not transpose.
And it is not like there is a place where inserting \q could make it
work.
I totally accept that. In
On 1/27/12 6:20 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Let's not get there.
Fine with me.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2092 needs work. I've changed status.
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Developers,
I've been thinking about the problem of sustaining LilyPond development
long-term (and specifically the problem of obtaining enough money to
support David K as long as he's interested).
As I've thought about it, going after a grant seems the most logical thing
to do. So I looked
On 2/8/12 11:01 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:29:00PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
So I looked into the National Endowment for the Arts and the
National Endowment for the Humanities.
I could see this funding Americans to work on lilypond
On 2/8/12 12:30 PM, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote:
Issue 2300: Patch: do not tinker with the position of a pitched
rest - R
5434061
changed to need_work (didn't find a better way to express I'm working on
it).
p
That's exactly the right way to do it. Thanks.
Carl
On 2/10/12 12:52 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:16:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
However, there is clearly no desire to
actually create that two-line patch, so I guess
I'm trying to see if it's possible to keep support for OSX 10.4, and at
the same time, have the proper version of lilypond shown in the About box.
In order to try to track this down, I'd like to have a git history to see
how things have changed.
According to issue 980, they're hosted at
On 2/14/12 9:40 AM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
Not feeling too good today (cold) so I thought I'd do something not too
mentally taxing - another go at building GUB. I've created a new user
just
for this, and git cloned the GUB repo. make bootstrap was fine, but make
lilyond
On 2/14/12 2:36 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:37:44PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
Anyway, here is a patched version:
http://klarinett.li/lilypond/osx-lilypad-universal-0.6.1.tar.gz
Thanks, uploaded to lilypond.org in the usual place.
I've
On 2/15/12 10:51 AM, Christian Hitz lilyp...@klarinett.li wrote:
Am 14.02.2012 um 23:42 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 2/14/12 2:36 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:37:44PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
Anyway, here is a patched version:
http
I deleted my gub/ directory and did a fresh git clone.
Did cd gub make bootstrap
Got the following:
building package: darwin-ppc::cross/gcc
*** Stage: download (cross/gcc, darwin-ppc)
*** Stage: compile (cross/gcc, darwin-ppc)
*** buffer overflow detected ***:
On 2/17/12 7:37 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
Did a Google search for this error message and found
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
Which indicates it may be a problem with -fno-stack-protect
That's
On 2/17/12 7:44 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 2/17/12 7:37 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
Did a Google search for this error message and found
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond
On 2/17/12 10:34 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:53:35PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
I guess that's possible, but the gcc in GUB is 4.1.1, which I don't
think
had that code generation bug.
It didn't
On 2/19/12 1:45 PM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Carl, dear developers,
Carl's recent comment in issue #2246 , introducing beamHalfMeasure ,
make me think, because I have never heard of such concept as half
measure beaming. Is it explained that way in references like Ross,
Read
On 2/22/12 10:17 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:42 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Somewhat independently, there is a mf2pt1.pl Perl
On 2/22/12 3:33 PM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 February 2012 00:56, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Quoting Gould: In 3/4, any number of quavers can be beamed together[,]
provided that groups in 3/4 do not give the appearance of 6/8
accentuation. a4. a8
On 2/22/12 4:40 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl,
the only thing that i'm wondering about is why you decided to create
new properties. From what i understand (please correct me if i'm
wrong) beaming all six eights in 3/4 time together can be easily
switched on and off
On 2/23/12 3:13 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:24:22PM +, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you help me with links to music glossary and internals? Julien
wrote that they are wrong, and i don't know how they should be done (and
i'm
On 2/25/12 9:23 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 03:57:55PM +, julien.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
This is good, I now get the error message right away when running
configure. No problem with the patch after installing the required
package. Do lilydev
OK, so I decided to try to start from scratch in building GUB.
I created a new virtual machine.
Loaded it with lily-dev 1.1, from
http://www.et.byu.edu/~sorensen/ubuntu-lilydev-remix-1.1.iso
Installed guest additions
Installed libmpfr-dev, with sudo apt-get libmpfr-dev
Got GUB with
git
On 2/26/12 9:34 AM, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Carl, could you close this Rietveld issue?
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/5539062/
Done, thanks.
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 3/2/12 11:58 PM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:38 PM, plros...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do stems fix the spacing?
I don't understand the question :(
I believe it's because stems are involved in optical spacing decisions.
Thanks,
Carl
On 3/5/12 3:17 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
What happens about the tax form? I'm not signing any legal
document unless I'm certain it's the right thing. Is GNU
submitting that foreign income thing for us ? ... although I
suppose that GNU is an American organization, so
On 3/8/12 2:44 PM, Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello, Janek!
Quoting Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
I'm attaching the Scheme code with a convoluted example (3 staves with
3 voices on each).
I don't have the time to dive into details, but the output looks good!
Be sure to
On 3/9/12 12:57 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:51:20PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
If somebody can make 10.4-x86 work, then it would be great to
officially support it again in the future. However, I think
that's too far away; delaying 2.16.0
David,
I noticed that in a recent patch you changed from constructing property
lists with list to using cons*.
I'm not questioning your decision. However, I'd like to gain some
understanding. Why was it necessary (or at least desirable) to make the
change? As far as I understand, the
On 3/14/12 11:48 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Lily-Devel List lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Various updates to reduce make
On 3/14/12 3:12 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I backed it out of staging. Try again.
Thanks, David. I guess if I figure out another fix, I'll have to try it
on lilydev to make sure it works there as well as here.
Carl
___
lilypond-devel
On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com
no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com wrote:
Thank you for submitting LilyPond organization application to Google
Summer of Code 2012.
Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your organization's application
at this time.
We received
On 3/20/12 9:08 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com lilyp...@googlecode.com
wrote:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #11 on issue 2389 by ColinPKCampbell: Patch: Fix make error in
regression tests coming from midi2ly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2389
On Apr 1, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
One of the warnings showing in make doc now is:
langdefs.py: warning: lilypond-doc gettext domain not found.
I'm not sure what to do about this.
IIUC, this warning shows that we are not handling localization properly.
On 4/1/12 1:39 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
below is my application, written according to GNU guidelines
(http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/guidelines.html). What do
you think about it?
Also, since this is a new project not mentioned on our GSoC page, i
need
On 4/3/12 3:17 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
The application should now be publicly visible here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/janek_w
archol/1#
Please note that i've changed the schedule, and also added a skill
evaluation as requested by
On 4/5/12 4:13 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I've decided that it's better to submit more than one application, so
here it comes: adding on-line, between-line, short and narrow versions
of some Feta glyphs -
On 4/6/12 5:33 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I know nothing about any Canadian ancestors of mine, but you never
know... :)
How did you like my article about LilyPond's weak sides and it's
future development? Do you think that my concerns are valid?
I think your concerns
On 4/5/12 12:51 PM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Does it make sense to replace the definitions in bar-line.cc/span-bar.cc
with the scheme equivalents? If yes, I'd draw a patch and would include
one example for integrating user-defined bar lines with the new approach
as a snippet (once I get
@gnu.org.
Thanks,
Carl Sorensen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Colin Campbell
c...@shaw.camailto:c...@shaw.ca wrote:
For 20:00 MDT Tuesday April 24
Documentation:
Issue 2488http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2488: Doc:
LM - Change 'Monophonic' to 'Homophonic' - R
Dear Jan,
Congratulations on having your Lyrics project accepted for Google Summer
of Code!
Mike Solomon has been assigned as your mentor, if you're not yet aware of
that. I believe that I will be serving as your backup mentor.
It's now time to ramp up to speed on your project. It's great to
On 4/23/12 6:25 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:04:57AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
Personally, I'm a bit worried about going on with translating NR
when I know that keeping it up-to-date will be an hassle.
Let's manage all the doc snippets in
On 4/24/12 7:56 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Regarding LSR
On 4/27/12 4:00 PM, d...@gnu.org d...@gnu.org wrote:
Instead, one can just add a single context mod adding the new grob
definition to the Score context definition.
Snip
It would make more sense to revert the respective commit creating the
snippet completely.
On May 5, 2012, at 8:16 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
But what about \footnote: that does not have this problem.
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
What a great idea! No notes generated; the duration
On May 7, 2012, at 3:29 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:00:39AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Evidence? 'skip' is exactly what it says on the tin.
But we are not talking about \skip (which actually would have the
On 5/12/12 4:37 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
w00t!
Mazal tov to everyone!
Graham's worst fears... If I remember correctly, we had two
applications for the Google Summer of Code, and only one has been
accepted under the GNU
On 5/18/12 1:42 PM, Marek Klein ma...@gregoriana.sk wrote:
Hello
2012/5/17 Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr
I'm not top posting.
Hello,
I just git clone Lilypond project and launched cppcheck (git updated
today).
I thought it could interest you, here are some examples :
Thanks for the file, Julien. I have split the warnings into various
issues.
See issues 2545, 2546, and 2548 through 2554 on the issue tracker.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2545colspec=ID%20Type%2
0Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary
On Jun 30, 2012, at 10:26 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Hey all,
Once the most recent critical issues are squashed, are people up for
forking off a stable branch from 2.15? Administratively we'd go into
cherrypick mode like we
On 9/23/12 4:48 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/23 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
The general rule is that the duration x is (whole note)/x. So in
addition to the current
1 2 4 8
we have
3 = \times 2/3 { c2 }(whole note divided by 3)
6 = \times
Neil Puttock n.puttock at gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Please review this patch here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/8874/show
Looks good!
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Graham Percival graham at percival-music.ca writes:
Progress has been slow for the past month. I'd like to be able to
claim that I'll be getting more done in the next few weeks, but in
all honesty I doubt it. If anything, I'll be engaged in *more*
household projects, not less.
With
Carl D. Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
Please review Mark Hohl's patch for improved tablature.
It's available at
http://codereview.appspot.com/67174
This is a second request for feedback on Marc's patch.
Tablature users are anxious for this to become part of LilyPond.
I'm trying to finish up the revisions to the autobeaming code.
I've got it working just fine when I compile from the command line.
But when snippets are included in the docs, they seem to compile different
than from the command line.
I'll take a snippet that's in the docs (not one that's
On 7/10/09 3:58 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/10/09 3:43 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:37:36PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Is there a different version of LilyPond called when make doc is running? I
can't figure
On 7/10/09 3:33 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Patrick McCartypnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have posted another patch to Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/show
It addresses all of the Bugs with solutions listed on the
On 7/10/09 4:13 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
When run from the command line, the output that results is attached as
FromCommandLine.png.
Are you running
lilypond foo.ly
? That will call
On 7/10/09 4:58 PM, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Ahh -- there is a clue here that I hadn't noticed before. The comments in
the code are different in the snippet from rhythms.itely and the doc
output.
That means
On 7/10/09 5:52 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carl Sorensenc_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/10/09 5:32 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009
What does one do when a snippet that is in the docs becomes obsolete?
The docs tag can be removed from the LSR.
The snippet reference can be removed from the English .itely file.
Does one then go and remove the snippet reference from the translated .itely
files as well?
Thanks,
Carl
On 7/10/09 6:38 PM, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/11 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Similiar stuff has happened to me, but since it involves the build
process, I never bothered trying to track down the problem. I
just do a make clean, make web-clean
On 7/11/09 12:29 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote:
@subsection Shaped Notes
@lilypond
\include font-table.ly
#(display-font-table 'shape-notes)
@end lilypond
@subsection Ancient Notes
@lilypond
\include font-table.ly
#(display-font-table
On 7/11/09 4:21 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Here's my proposal for the source/makefile view of documentation.
(this is the big argument one)
In general, I think these proposals are reasonable.
My understanding is that linking between texinfo manuals is easier
On 7/11/09 3:08 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Carl Sorensenc_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/10/09 5:52 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I do (on Linux):
1.) Move all of the LilyPond fonts (aybabtu, etc.) and the
OK, so I'm making syntax changes in autobeaming for LilyPond.
I've worked through rhythms.itely and input/lsr (and I'll soon work through
input/regression).
Now my make doc is failing because of snippets in /de/user/rhythms.itely
that use the old syntax and have, in many cases, been removed from
At *long* last I have completed my changes to the autobeaming rules.
The rietveld patch set is available at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155
The objective is to get all information that affects autobeaming in a single
place, so a single override will adjust the autobeam settings.
Autobeam
On 7/11/09 6:07 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote:
At *long* last I have completed my changes to the autobeaming rules.
The rietveld patch set is available at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155
The objective is to get all information
On 7/12/09 11:13 AM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1044
File Documentation/user/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1044#newcode1662
Line 1662: of the beam, e.g. @code{#'(1 . 16)}, or
On 7/12/09 9:43 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/12 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I've created a second patch set with the whitespace removed (along with
automatic removal of whitespace from the lines of the files that weren't
part of the patch).
Brilliant work
On 7/12/09 11:13 AM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045
File
input/lsr/automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly
(right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045#newcode1
Line 1: %% Do not edit
On 7/12/09 11:13 AM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045
File
input/lsr/automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly
(right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045#newcode1
Line 1: %% Do not edit
On 7/12/09 11:21 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Does one then go and remove the snippet reference from the translated .itely
files as well?
This is what I've always done, otherwise you're left with broken
documentation.
So
So I've worked on all the translations of rhythms.itely (english, es, fr,
de) for the new changes to autobeaming.
I ran make doc, and everything worked OK until we got to mass-link.py.
Given the error message, it appears there's something wrong with the
makefile. cp -u is called, and there is
On 7/13/09 10:55 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:18:58PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
I found this interesting link:
https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?35556
It looks like cp -u will only work under Linux. John added the -u
flag earlier this
On 7/10/09 3:37 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
I'm trying to finish up the revisions to the autobeaming code.
I've got it working just fine when I compile from the command line.
But when snippets are included in the docs, they seem to compile different
than from
I've posted a new patch set on Rietveld which I think is a release
candidate.
It has changes in all the translated rhythms.itely files so that all of the
docs build properly.
It has the revised snippets in input/new added to the repository.
It has cleaned up all of the issues that Neil
On 7/13/09 1:35 AM, Bret Aarden bret.aar...@gmail.com wrote:
I've written a music search tool that exports MusicXML and colors the
matching notes, and I'd like those colors to show up in LilyPond
typesetting.
There is no doubt a much more elegant way to do this, but the included
On 7/14/09 3:33 PM, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Please junk (without blindly reverting) those -u flags I added. I've
started offline cleaning up translated docs generation, one planned
feature is HTML and PDF output of translations directly in
Documentation/user, so this
On 7/14/09 2:15 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
In NR 5.3.4 The \tweak command, it says this:
Notably the \tweak command cannot be used to modify stems, beams
or accidentals, since these are generated later by note heads,
rather than by music elements in the input
On 7/14/09 4:11 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/14 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Can we get something in the CG about this problem, and how to run
update-snippets.py to fix things, or at least a statement about the easiest
way to solve the problem?
It's already
On 7/14/09 4:08 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/12 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I don't know. I didn't write displayLilyMusic; that was Nicolas IIRC. I do
know that \time 3/4 executes those functions. It's really easy to go
forward in the parse tree (i.e. from
On 7/15/09 9:30 AM, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Le mercredi 15 juillet 2009 à 07:43 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
On 7/14/09 3:57 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/95/1147#newcode69
Line 69: section 1.2.4 Beams
On 7/15/09 3:45 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/2005/3086
File scm/music-functions.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/2005/3086#newcode519
Line 519: (make-simultaneous-music output)
This breaks all the
On 7/15/09 6:30 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/15 John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com:
Le lundi 13 juillet 2009 à 06:07 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
So, in order to not have broken documentation, I need to eliminate old file
referenes, and old in-line snippets
On 7/16/09 9:31 AM, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
So, just to make sure I'm clear on this, I'd like to propose the following
for addition to the CG:
When a snippet is changed or deleted from the english documentation, the
same change (or deletion) should be applied to
Marc Hohl has completed a patch for improved tablature support. It is
available for review at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/95059
Please review and comment.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
I'd like permission to move the information on regression testing from make
test-baseline and make check from the AU to the CG (There's a placeholder
there already; section 7).
Any concerns about doing this?
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 7/16/09 4:00 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote:
Marc Hohl has completed a patch for improved tablature support. It is
available for review at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/95059
Please review and comment.
Thanks,
Carl
I like
On 7/16/09 9:56 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Marc Hohl has completed a patch for improved tablature support. It is
available for review at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/95059
Please review and comment.
Thanks,
Marc,
Here are some comments.
1) All regression tests
On 7/16/09 5:54 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote:
So, while I asked Marc to provide documentation, I didn't require it. I
did, however, require regtests.
As soon as we get the patch applied, we can ask one of the people who is
clamoring for improved
1 - 100 of 1840 matches
Mail list logo
