> Here's another stab at glyphnames.json.txt, given all this new information:
>
> glyphnames.json is a part of the Standard Music Font Layout
> (SMuFL) specification, version 1.3. It was retrieved from
> https://github.com/w3c/smufl on 29 Aug 2020, and is licensed under
> the W3C Final
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 3:09 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > So, glyphnames.json.txt would look like this?
> >
> > glyphnames.json, created by Daniel Spreadbury, was retrieved from
> > https://github.com/w3c/smufl on DD Mon . It is licensed under
> > the W3C Community Contributor
> So, glyphnames.json.txt would look like this?
>
> glyphnames.json, created by Daniel Spreadbury, was retrieved from
> https://github.com/w3c/smufl on DD Mon . It is licensed under
> the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement and the W3C Final
> Specification Agreement.
Looks
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:07 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> * Who has written the file `glyphnames.json`? It lacks a copyright
> header. If this is a non-lilypond file copied verbatim, please add
> a separate file (say, `glyphnames.json.txt`) that gives all the
> details: author, origin,
> I've reordered and rebased my code, and it is now up to date with
> the current master. I've just published the new branch to GitLab as
> dev/lamb/GSoC-2020-final if you'd like to give it a look. It's only
> nine commits now, instead of over a hundred, and they're ordered in
> a way that's
>> At the same time, I'll write docs for my work. I figure I'll make
>> nine documentation commits, one for each code change commit.
Hmm. Maybe I've misunderstood you. What's actually missing are
documentation strings *within* the commits. For example, the commit
Add smufl data to feta
Am Montag, den 24.08.2020, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > I've reordered and rebased my code, and it is now up to date with
> > the current master. I've just published the new branch to GitLab
> as
> > dev/lamb/GSoC-2020-final if you'd like to give it a look. It's
> only
> > nine
> I've reordered and rebased my code, and it is now up to date with
> the current master. I've just published the new branch to GitLab as
> dev/lamb/GSoC-2020-final if you'd like to give it a look. It's only
> nine commits now, instead of over a hundred, and they're ordered in
> a way that's
Hi all!
First, an apology--I thought the project was due today, the 23rd, but it's
actually due next week, on the 31st. Tomorrow is just the first day I can
submit the project. Well, better to err on the side of caution! I'd like to
finish things up at least three days before the Monday
