Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: I am not at home but Patchy complained just now. -- Forwarded message -- From: pkx1...@gmail.com Date: 14 March 2012 18:34 Subject: Patchy email Merged staging, now at: c6a925ecd742196979038804b02846faad7f2cc9        Success:          

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:16:17PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: commit 65c8ce914c62117fb61a21237f7dcf80ebb0cc6e Make Score an initial Timing alias to allow for context mods But then I am pretty certain that I actually ran make info on that one to make reasonably sure it did not cause

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:16:17PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: commit 65c8ce914c62117fb61a21237f7dcf80ebb0cc6e Make Score an initial Timing alias to allow for context mods But then I am pretty certain that I actually ran make info on

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:45:39PM +, Graham Percival wrote: info will check if you can generate the internals reference, i.e. with scm/documentation-generate.scm. It won't call the lilypond binary to produce any output at all. No wait, I'm completely wrong. Sorry, I was thinking of make

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:16 PM Subject: Re: Failed make doc for Patchy James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: I am not at home but Patchy complained just now. Shall I run patchy and check

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: - Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:16 PM Subject: Re: Failed make doc for Patchy James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: I am not at home but Patchy complained just

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: - Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:16 PM Subject: Re: Failed make doc for Patchy James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: I am

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread James
Hello, On 14 March 2012 20:04, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: - Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:16 PM Subject: Re: Failed make doc for Patchy James pkx1

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
make doc for Patchy James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: I am not at home but Patchy complained just now. Shall I run patchy and check the logfiles? I've just done it and I get this file that causes the complaints Yup, echo turns \v into vertical tab. Really daft

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
, 2012 7:16 PM Subject: Re: Failed make doc for Patchy James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: I am not at home but Patchy complained just now. Shall I run patchy and check the logfiles? I've just done it and I get this file that causes the complaints Yup, echo turns \v into vertical tab

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/14/12 3:12 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: I backed it out of staging. Try again. Thanks, David. I guess if I figure out another fix, I'll have to try it on lilydev to make sure it works there as well as here. Carl ___ lilypond-devel

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes: On 3/14/12 3:12 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: I backed it out of staging. Try again. Thanks, David. I guess if I figure out another fix, I'll have to try it on lilydev to make sure it works there as well as here. Afraid so. bash has no

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:27:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: And the MacOSX /bin/sh is the first shell I heard of that does not grok echo -n. ... If this may not be true, `printf' is in general safer and easier to use than `echo' and `echo -n'. This matches the open group

Re: Failed make doc for Patchy

2012-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:27:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: And the MacOSX /bin/sh is the first shell I heard of that does not grok echo -n. ... If this may not be true, `printf' is in general safer and easier to use than `echo'