Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 13:30 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-03-26 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> Thomas Morley writes: >>> 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-03-26 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> Backing out that patch from staging, and taking a further look.

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> >>> Backing out that patch from staging, and taking a further look. >> >> How to proceed? >> Upload a fixed patch for review?

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 10:53:19 +0200 Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > >> 2017-03-26 0:48 GMT+01:00 James : > >>> Hello > >>> > >>> After 5099 was

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > >> Backing out that patch from staging, and taking a further look. > > How to proceed? > Upload a fixed patch for review? Probably. > I'm terribly sorry for the additional work for you

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > Sorry, for empty mail, misclicked. > Obviously I need more coffee ... > > 2017-03-26 10:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Am 26. März 2017 10:59:03 MESZ schrieb Thomas Morley : >Sorry, for empty mail, misclicked. >Obviously I need more coffee ... > Yep. "Sometimes I make me a coffee in the morning - but usually coffee makes *me*. ___

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Sorry, for empty mail, misclicked. Obviously I need more coffee ... 2017-03-26 10:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue >> 5099 was. > > That would be a rather

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 10:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-03-26 0:48 GMT+01:00 James : >>> Hello >>> >>> After 5099 was pushed I am now seeing problems with basic 'make'. > >> >> accidently I permanently deleted the branch

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 10:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue >> 5099 was. > > That would be a rather difficult feat (you don't do things like that > "accidentally" with Git

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue > 5099 was. That would be a rather difficult feat (you don't do things like that "accidentally" with Git since you have to work very hard to do them, with a set of very

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-03-26 0:48 GMT+01:00 James : >> Hello >> >> After 5099 was pushed I am now seeing problems with basic 'make'. > > accidently I permanently deleted the branch where the patch for issue 5099 > was. > But I had it as

Re: Issue 5099 - staging broken?

2017-03-26 0:48 GMT+01:00 James : > Hello > > After 5099 was pushed I am now seeing problems with basic 'make'. > > --snip-- > > og level set to 287 > Relocation: is absolute: > argv0=/tmp/build-lilypond-autobuild/out/bin/lilypond > PATH=/tmp/build-lilypond-autobuild/out/bin