Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:17 AM Valentin Villenave
 wrote:
>
> I’ve received reports from two FreeBSD users that the x86_64 installer
> doesn’t work.
> - One said that the binary isn’t recognized as an "amd64" arch (he’s
> using FreeBSD 12.0 on a core i7).

I saw the same thing; apparently FreeBSD wants to see "amd64" and
LilyPond gives "x86_64" instead. The installer still resulted in a
working LilyPond, though...

> - Another user has extracted the sh installer using -E option, then
> decompressing the tar.bz2 archive; however he couldn’t launch lilypond
> because of incompatible libs:
> "Shared object "libm.so.4" not found" (his distro has .5).

...after following Masamichi Hosoda's advice to install compat6x,
which resolved the libm.so.# error.




-- 
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Valentin Villenave]

On 2/6/19, Karlin High  wrote:
> I got the LilyPond app extracted from .tar.bz and it opens and runs.

Greetings Knut,

I’ve received reports from two FreeBSD users that the x86_64 installer
doesn’t work.
- One said that the binary isn’t recognized as an "amd64" arch (he’s
using FreeBSD 12.0 on a core i7).
- Another user has extracted the sh installer using -E option, then
decompressing the tar.bz2 archive; however he couldn’t launch lilypond
because of incompatible libs:
"Shared object "libm.so.4" not found" (his distro has .5).

Cheers,
V.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Knut Petersen]

On 05.02.19 00:36, Karlin High wrote:

On 1/29/2019 3:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:

lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh

Intel Core i5-3450 3.10 GHz
Windows 7 Pro 64-bit SP1
VirtualBox 5.2.22r126460
VM with 2 cores and 4 GB RAM

$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd32-vbox 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  i386

# pkg install compat6x-i386

And it seems to work. A simple C-Major scale compiled just fine.

Ok.


It does look like there would be some further issues to resolve,
dependencies perhaps. I was going to give it a good test by compiling
the Heinrich Schütz "Schwanengesang" Psalm 119 that Brent Annable had
posted back in May 2018 - makes 194 pages. LilyPond parsed and
interpreted music and preprocessed graphical objects, then said "fatal
error: cannot allocate 70423 bytes."


Hmm ... 32bit ... 194 pages ... it could be that job really consumed all usable 
memory ;-)


I tried convert-ly, it gave a Python error that ended with "Undefined
symbol "PyString_Type"

Executing lilypond/usr/bin/python said: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libstdc++.so.6" not found, required by "python"


Direct execution of binaries in lilypond/usr/bin is not expected to  work, they 
need some help ... see ~/bin/lilypond-wrapper.python.



That's about as far as I want to go here; the test was mainly just for
the installer.


Thanks for your help.

Knut


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On 1/29/2019 3:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh

Intel Core i5-3450 3.10 GHz
Windows 7 Pro 64-bit SP1
VirtualBox 5.2.22r126460
VM with 2 cores and 4 GB RAM

$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd32-vbox 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  i386

# pkg install compat6x-i386

And it seems to work. A simple C-Major scale compiled just fine.

It does look like there would be some further issues to resolve,
dependencies perhaps. I was going to give it a good test by compiling
the Heinrich Schütz "Schwanengesang" Psalm 119 that Brent Annable had
posted back in May 2018 - makes 194 pages. LilyPond parsed and
interpreted music and preprocessed graphical objects, then said "fatal
error: cannot allocate 70423 bytes."

I tried convert-ly, it gave a Python error that ended with "Undefined
symbol "PyString_Type"

Executing lilypond/usr/bin/python said: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libstdc++.so.6" not found, required by "python"

That's about as far as I want to go here; the test was mainly just for
the installer.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Knut Petersen]

Hi Karlin!


Maybe, installing compat6x package is required.

# pkg install compat6x-amd64

...and it did indeed fix the issue. LilyPond seems fully functional.

Next, I want to make a FreeBSD 32-bit VM, and see about reviving an
iMac G5 to test the PowerPC installers. Although I doubt there's a
very big user base for those.


Thanks for your help!

Yes, some of the installers target somewhat aged platforms ... but as long as 
the installers are functional and don't cause too much work to maintain there's 
no reason  not to keep them around.

Knut


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

> > ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "lilypond"
> >
> > Are there any further efforts anyone would like to see made here?
>
> Maybe, installing compat6x package is required.

# pkg install compat6x-amd64

...and it did indeed fix the issue. LilyPond seems fully functional.

Next, I want to make a FreeBSD 32-bit VM, and see about reviving an
iMac G5 to test the PowerPC installers. Although I doubt there's a
very big user base for those.
-- 
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Masamichi Hosoda]

> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD freebsd-hyperv 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  
> amd64

> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "lilypond"
> 
> Are there any further efforts anyone would like to see made here?

Maybe, installing compat6x package is required.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:20 AM Knut Petersen  wrote:

> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh

I have little experience with FreeBSD, but decided to have a go at this.

Intel Core i5-2400 3.10 GHz
Windows 10 Pro x64 Version 1803
Hyper-V virtual machine, 2 processors and 2 GB RAM

$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-hyperv 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  amd64

Executing the LilyPond installer goes like this. I renamed the installer

lilypond installer for version 2.21.0 release 1,
x86_64 build.
For a list of options, abort (^C) then do:
sh ./lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh --help

Warning: this build is not optimized for your architecture;
please install a amd64 build instead.

Press C to install the program anyway (not recommended),
E to only extract the program files, or any other key to exit.

Well, I pressed C. This is what VMs are for, right? Install seemed to
go OK. But running lilypond says this:

ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "lilypond"

Are there any further efforts anyone would like to see made here?
-- 
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Abraham Lee]

Hi, Knut, et al!

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:19 AM Knut Petersen 
wrote:

> Hi everybody
>
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by
> an updated version of our build system GUB:
>
> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
>
> There you'll find
> ...
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> ...
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results
> already have been posted.
>
> Knut
>

Installation + Compile works on my Windows 8.1 (64-bit) machine.

Best,
Abraham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Alexander Kobel]

Hi,

On 29.01.19 10:19, Knut Petersen wrote:
Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated 
by an updated version of our build system GUB:

[...]
    lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
    lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh


Work like a charm on Arch Linux.


Cheers,
Alex



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

Am 2019-01-30 um 09:45 schrieb Knut Petersen :

> Thanks for testing the installers. Below I try to summarize your results:

Thanks for your work!
(And to everyone involved, of course!)

>  lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 
> OK:
>   • Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave 
> 10.14.2 [Karlin High]
>   • iMac with High Sierra (installer worked ok but Michael reports a 
> problem with lilypond not finding the external lilyjazz font) [Michael Hendry]

Looks OK on Mac mini Server Core i7 (2013) and OSX 10.9.5: works. Long 
first-run delay, to be expected. Chokes on my old code, didn’t check further.


Greetlings, Hraban
---
fiëé visuëlle
Henning Hraban Ramm
https://www.fiee.net





___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Paolo Cantamessa]

Tested with:

CPU Intel Core i5-6200U 2,30 GHz 4 GB RAM
Win 10 Home 1809

Works fine!

Thank-you for all your great work!

Paolo



[image: Mailtrack]

Sender
notified by
Mailtrack

30/01/19,
10:22:59




Il giorno mer 30 gen 2019 alle ore 09:46 Knut Petersen <
knut_peter...@t-online.de> ha scritto:

> Hi everybody!
>
> Thanks for testing the installers. Below I try to summarize your results:
>
> *lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh *
>
> OK:
>
>- Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (bionic), running under Windows Subsystem for
>Linux  Windows 10 Version 1803 (OS Build 17134.523) [Aaron Hill]
>- [Johan Vromans]
>- Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]
>- Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS [Paul Morris]
>
> *lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh  *
>
> OK:
>
>- Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]
>
> *lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe*
>
> OK:
>
>- Windows 10 Pro 64-bit version 1803. [Karlin High]
>- Windows 10 Home on Intel Core i7-7500U cpu [Trevor Daniels]
>- Windows 10 Home 1809, installation proceeds without problems.
>[Matthias Böhringer]
>- Windows 10 Version 1803. [Michael Käppler]
>
> * lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 *
>
> OK:
>
>- Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave
>10.14.2 [Karlin High]
>- iMac with High Sierra (installer worked ok but Michael reports a
>problem with lilypond not finding the external lilyjazz font) [Michael
>Hendry]
>
> *No test reports for*
>
>
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>
> Knut
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Hendry]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 19:00, Urs Liska  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Am 29. Januar 2019 19:47:07 MEZ schrieb Michael Hendry 
> :
>>> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everybody
>>> 
>>> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond,
>> generated by an updated version of our build system GUB:
>>> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
>>> There you'll find
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
>>> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
>>> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and
>> report success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical
>> test results already have been posted.
>>> 
>>> Knut
>>> ___
>>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> 
>> Failed with a previously successfully compiled leadsheet file. Same
>> result after running convert.ly.
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>> Starting lilypond 2.21.0 [Swing 39.ly]...
>> Processing `/Users/michaelhendry/LilyPond Working/Swing 39/Swing 39.ly'
>> Parsing...
>> Interpreting
>> music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][192][200][208][216][224][224]
>> Preprocessing graphical objects...
>> fatal error: cannot find font: `lilyjazz-11'
>> Exited with return code 1.
> 
> If you use alternative notation fonts you have to "install" them for every 
> new LilyPond installation.

Thanks, I hadn’t been aware of that and had assumed that “installation” was a 
system-wide procedure. 

Michael


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Thomas Scharkowski]

LilyPond 2.21.0 installation works here:

macOS Mojave 10.14.2
iMac late 2013
Frescobaldi 2.20.0

I have tested several files, everything seems to be ok.

For one file 2.21.0 shows these errors, though:
...
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 113.948878
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 114.051065
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 114.330572
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 115.915120
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 116.017228
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 116.017228
continuing, cross fingers
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 2 or 3 pages...
...
Success: compilation successfully completed

The result is ok, I don't know what the error messages mean.

No errors with 2.19.82

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Knut Petersen]

Hi everybody!

Thanks for testing the installers. Below I try to summarize your results:

*lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh*

   OK:

 * Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (bionic), running under Windows Subsystem for Linux  
Windows 10 Version 1803 (OS Build 17134.523) [Aaron Hill]
 * [Johan Vromans]
 * Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]
 * Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS [Paul Morris]

***lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh *

   OK:

 * Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]

*lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe*

   OK:

 * Windows 10 Pro 64-bit version 1803. [Karlin High]
 * Windows 10 Home on Intel Core i7-7500U cpu [Trevor Daniels]
 * Windows 10 Home 1809, installation proceeds without problems. [Matthias 
Böhringer]
 * Windows 10 Version 1803. [Michael Käppler]

* lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 *

   OK:

 * Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave 
10.14.2 [Karlin High]
 * iMac with High Sierra (installer worked ok but Michael reports a problem 
with lilypond not finding the external lilyjazz font) [Michael Hendry]

*No test reports for*

 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh

Knut


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[David Wright]

On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 10:19:33 (+0100), Knut Petersen wrote:
> Hi everybody
> 
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
> updated version of our build system GUB:
> 
>https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> 
> There you'll find
> 
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
>lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> 
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> already have been posted.

I downloaded and installed lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh.
Running this on a couple of scores, things looked fine.
(One slight spacing difference in comparison with 2.19.80.)

The tree of files has some differences, but I don't know enough
about where things should be to have an opinion on what's right/better.

The only thing that might concern you is that I went to the web page
above, RightClicked on the file I wanted, selected 'Copy link location'
and pasted the result as the target of wget.

Here's the resulting dialogue:

$ wget 
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu/download?path=%2F=lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
[1] 24275
$ --2019-01-29 12:58:33-- 
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu/download?path=%2F
Resolving cloud.ursliska.de (cloud.ursliska.de)... 85.25.3.15
Connecting to cloud.ursliska.de (cloud.ursliska.de)|85.25.3.15|:443... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [application/zip]
Saving to: ‘download?path=%2F’

download?path=%2F[<=>] 245.60M  
2.14MB/sin 2m 48s

2019-01-29 13:01:24 (1.46 MB/s) - ‘download?path=%2F’ saved [257530138]

^C
[1]+  Done  wget 
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu/download?path=%2F
$ 

In other words, I got the lot. It doesn't concern me, but you might
prefer less traffic on the site.

Archive:  download?path=%2F
  Length  DateTimeName
-  -- -   
0  2019-01-29 18:58   gub/
 26609979  2019-01-29 07:36   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
 26597456  2019-01-29 07:37   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
 31320357  2019-01-29 07:38   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
 28015239  2019-01-29 07:38   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
 31292293  2019-01-29 07:39   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
 30542915  2019-01-29 07:40   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
 31158331  2019-01-29 07:41   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
 34771252  2019-01-29 07:42   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
 17220012  2019-01-29 07:35   gub/lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
- ---
257527834 10 files

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[David Wright]

On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 13:56:00 (-0600), David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 10:19:33 (+0100), Knut Petersen wrote:
> > Hi everybody
> > 
> > Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by 
> > an updated version of our build system GUB:
> > 
> >https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> > 
> > There you'll find
> > 
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> >lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> > 
> > Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> > success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> > already have been posted.
> 
> I downloaded and installed lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh.
> Running this on a couple of scores, things looked fine.

And just the same with lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh,
both these on Debian 9 stretch.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Käppler]

Am 29.01.2019 um 10:19 schrieb Knut Petersen:


lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh


Works fine, Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, Kernel 4.15.0-36-generic running as
guest in VirtualBox 5.2.22 r126460, host Windows 10 Version 1803.


lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe


Works fine too, Windows 10 Version 1803.

Thank you all for your great work!

Michael

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Paul Morris]

On 1/29/19 1:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:


Paul Morris  writes:


On 1/29/19 4:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:


lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh

Installed on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS and tested with a couple of
pieces. Everything appears to be working fine.

Thanks to all for the work on GUB and the next stable LilyPond release!

Well, 21.0 is the next unstable release...


Ah, yes, I didn't intend to imply otherwise, but I see how what I wrote 
could have been misleading.  (I was just thinking along the lines of 
'work on GUB contributes to the release of the next stable', but I may 
not be fully aware of all the details there.)


Thanks for the clarification.

-Paul


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Hans Åberg]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 20:00, Urs Liska  wrote:
> 
> If you use alternative notation fonts you have to "install" them for every 
> new LilyPond installation.

On MacOS it used used to work installing as a system font, and then only once 
is required. Tried with Bravura.otf.



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Urs Liska]

Am 29. Januar 2019 19:47:07 MEZ schrieb Michael Hendry 
:
>> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen 
>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everybody
>> 
>> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond,
>generated by an updated version of our build system GUB:
>> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
>> There you'll find
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
>> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
>> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and
>report success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical
>test results already have been posted.
>> 
>> Knut
>> ___
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>Failed with a previously successfully compiled leadsheet file. Same
>result after running convert.ly.
>
>Michael
>
>
> Starting lilypond 2.21.0 [Swing 39.ly]...
>Processing `/Users/michaelhendry/LilyPond Working/Swing 39/Swing 39.ly'
>Parsing...
>Interpreting
>music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][192][200][208][216][224][224]
>Preprocessing graphical objects...
>fatal error: cannot find font: `lilyjazz-11'
>Exited with return code 1.

If you use alternative notation fonts you have to "install" them for every new 
LilyPond installation.

>___
>lilypond-devel mailing list
>lilypond-devel@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Hendry]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen  wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody
> 
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
> updated version of our build system GUB:
> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> There you'll find
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> already have been posted.
> 
> Knut
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

PS Apologies, should have said I’m using an iMac with High Sierra, and had 
launched the compilation from Frescobaldi.

Michael


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Hendry]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen  wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody
> 
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
> updated version of our build system GUB:
> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> There you'll find
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> already have been posted.
> 
> Knut
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Failed with a previously successfully compiled leadsheet file. Same result 
after running convert.ly.

Michael


 Starting lilypond 2.21.0 [Swing 39.ly]...
Processing `/Users/michaelhendry/LilyPond Working/Swing 39/Swing 39.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][192][200][208][216][224][224]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
fatal error: cannot find font: `lilyjazz-11'
Exited with return code 1.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[David Kastrup]

Paul Morris  writes:

> On 1/29/19 4:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:
>
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>
> Installed on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS and tested with a couple of
> pieces. Everything appears to be working fine.
>
> Thanks to all for the work on GUB and the next stable LilyPond release!

Well, 21.0 is the next unstable release...

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Paul Morris]

On 1/29/19 4:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:


lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh


Installed on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS and tested with a couple of pieces. 
Everything appears to be working fine.


Thanks to all for the work on GUB and the next stable LilyPond release!

-Paul


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On 1/29/2019 3:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:

    lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2


Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave 10.14.2
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Trevor]

Knut Petersen wrote 29/01/2019 09:19:33

Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
updated version of our build system GUB:

   https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu

There you'll find

   lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
   lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz

Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
already have been posted.
The mingw.exe download appears to work fine in Frescobaldi running under 
Windows 10 Home on Intel Core i7-7500U cpu. I'll continue to use it for 
all future typesetting.


Looking good! Many thanks to David, Knut, Urs and all those involved in 
generating this release!


Trevor
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:20 AM Knut Petersen  wrote:
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe

Seems to work on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit version 1803.

And it's definitely LilyPond 2.21 because it choked on \partcombine
and needed \partCombine instead. Fixed with convert-ly.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel