On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2017-07-31 18:09 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> David Nalesnik writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi David,
>
> this refers to
> http://lists.gnu.org/archiv
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 7/31/17 8:08 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
> d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>Now the thing is that with the new change in place, we would not
>>necessarily _need_ different arguments: an integral multiplier larger
>>than 1 could be taken as a multi-measur
On 7/31/17 8:08 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
wrote:
>
>Now the thing is that with the new change in place, we would not
>necessarily _need_ different arguments: an integral multiplier larger
>than 1 could be taken as a multi-measure rest count, like
>
>{1*4}
>
>So we likely _co
2017-07-31 18:09 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
Hi David,
this refers to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
I opened a new thr
David Nalesnik writes:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> this refers to
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
>>> I opened a new thread, because this one will be about rest-markups only.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> this refers to
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
>> I opened a new thread, because this one will be about rest-markups only.
>>
>> rest-by-number-markup and r
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi David,
>
> this refers to
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
> I opened a new thread, because this one will be about rest-markups only.
>
> rest-by-number-markup and rest-markup were impemented by myself
> commit ffa21bb1a55d2436bb4