[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They should be available, ie, there should be nothing 'to fix' on
Linux. Did you build LilyPond yourself? Did you build and install
the pfa fonts? Maybe we need
On 2002.09.09 18:25 Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
Hello,
I know it's pretty bleeding-edge, but I have recently upgraded my
system to gcc-3.2 and encounter problems when trying to compile
lilypond 1.6.2 (as expected after the reading of INSTALL.txt)...
So, I've followed the instructions
Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
Hello,
I know it's pretty bleeding-edge, but I have recently upgraded my
system to gcc-3.2 and encounter problems when trying to compile
lilypond 1.6.2 (as expected after the reading of INSTALL.txt)...
For what it's worth, after struggling not only with LilyPond
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
...
lexer.ll: In member function `virtual int My_lily_lexer::yylex()':
lexer.ll:227: `cerr' undeclared (first use this function)
lexer.ll:227: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
function it appears in.)
Is
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Atte Andre Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) apg-get install -t unstable gave me lily 1.6.0, which makes me wonder
what the policies are concerning when (how soon) to find which version of
lily in stable/frozen/unstable...???
You most
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, if you're using some sort of UNIX, as most Lily users probably
do, you'll be using PostScript instead of PDF, and you don't need
pfa
fonts or all those tools.
Yes, but as soon as you want to publish your scores
on WWW or email it to
Hello,
Using gcc 3.2 and flex 1.5.19 (ftp://ftp.uncg.edu/people/wlestes/), and
thanks to advices from Joerg Anders (thanks a lot), I manage to compile
lilypond 1.6.2 by adding :
using namespace std;
at the top of lily/lexer.ll
I report this in the hope that it will be useful for other
