"Rob V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can't find property type-check for 'stz'
,[ ChangeLog ]
| 2003-12-31 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * scm/define-translator-properties.scm: remove
| melismaEngraverBusy, stz property.
`
--
Thanks,
Jeff
__
I just upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.1.11 on Cygwin and used convert-ly to generate
a new file. When I ran
the new file through Lilypond, I got the error:
Can't find property type-check for 'stz'
I looked through the new documentation, and couldn't find the reference to "stz"
anymore. Has this be
The following code produces a natural sign for the last but one note
that should not be there.
How can I hide it?
Thomas
\score
{
\notes
{
\clef bass
\key a \major
s2. s8 c8~ c2~ c8 c4.
}
}
\paper {}
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now %RND_SYB
forensic whitlock grape doctorate burroughs concrete belove fanout scholastic extracellular hertzog airpark geld menfolk inherent prim tenneco class accidental ukrainian ah anaerobic spasm byway conflagration bryophyta bauxite ligh
In v1.6.10, Lily set rehearsal marks at the beginning of a line in a
nice big, bold face, after the key signature. However, in v2.0.0, it was
much more insignificant and slap bang on top of the bar number.
It seems that the rehearsal marks in 2.0.x are not typeset in boldface,
just one step larger
An half-ugly solution is to do
\notes{c d e f g }
\lyrics{li -- _ -- _ -- ly -- pond }
which is easy to do with find/replace in the files but produces
hyphens that are somewhat unevenly spaced.
Sorry, can't think of any better solution at the moment.
Note also that the lyrics alignment has been co
--- Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the g is the only common note between the two chords, LilyPond
> will automatically give you the desired tie if you have
> 4 ~ 2
> for example.
I knew this, really I did! I was just making things harder for myself than I
should have. The voice
Hi
I would like to know if there is any way to indicate a melisma using the
underscore _ (or other character) inside the Lyrics block.
I know that to get a melisma the proper thing to do is combine the lines:
\notes{c \melisma d e f \melismaEnd g}
\lyrics{li -- ly -- pond }
but I would like to us
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Binary packages of LilyPond 2.1.14 for Debian Woody are
> available at
>
> http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/lilypond
>
> Thanks to Han-Wen and Jan for their support!
Thanks to Ferenc, Han-Wen, Jan and all! I have just installed 2.1.14
and will be workin
By mistake, I sent the answer only to Ray. Since we had a
copule of misleading answers to the list, it's best to add
my attempt to the list archives as well.
/Mats
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Since the g is the only common note between the two chords, LilyPond
will automatically give you the desired
FYI-
(Mac OS 10.2.8 under Fink)
I have been unable to compile v 2.1.14 of Lilypond using the method I
previously used to update to 2.1.10. (It worked with 2.1.12, but some
spacing issues led me to drop back to 2.1.10.)
I first changed references to the previous version, 2.1.x to 2.1.14 in
Ray McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've attached a small PNG file to illustrate something
> similar to my situation. Here is the source for it:
>
> \notes { \time 3/4 << 4 \\ b4 >> 2 }
>
> What I want to do is, keeping the stem layout in the
> example, tie the top G between the chords.
Thanks, Mats (and Kieren) for your speedy response - I think I
understand now - last time I used a global statement it didn't contain
stuff that had to be in a Staff context; and yes, putting the lyrics in
the Staff context was a silly typo that I just couldn't see (Doh!).
I shall now set about re
On Thursday 22 January 2004 00:31, Ray McKinney wrote:
> I've attached a small PNG file to illustrate something similar to my
> situation. Here is the source for it:
> \notes { \time 3/4 << 4 \\ b4 >> 2 }
>
> What I want to do is, keeping the stem layout in the example, tie the
> top G between th
Binary packages of LilyPond 2.1.14 for Debian Woody are
available at
http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/lilypond
Thanks to Han-Wen and Jan for their support!
--
Feri.
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Please always try to run convert-ly on your old files before
reporting a problem with a newer version. If you want to follow
the quick upgrades in the development versions, you may have to
read the ChangeLog to be able to catch up with all the changes.
(In this particular cas
Please always try to run convert-ly on your old files before
reporting a problem with a newer version. If you want to follow
the quick upgrades in the development versions, you may have to
read the ChangeLog to be able to catch up with all the changes.
(In this particular case, I notice that the re
try convert-ly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> With Pedro's packages for Debian sid a test file:
>
> #(set-staff-size 20)
>
> \score {
> <<
> \context Staff = flute { a4 b c d }
> >>
> }
>
> which works in 2.1.12 when run with 2.1.13 gives:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/music/pima$ lilypon
With Pedro's packages for Debian sid a test file:
#(set-staff-size 20)
\score {
<<
\context Staff = flute { a4 b c d }
>>
}
which works in 2.1.12 when run with 2.1.13 gives:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/music/pima$ lilypond ../test/dy2test.ly
lilypond (GNU LilyPond) 2.1.13
Running usr...
Now pro
With Pedro's packages for Debian sid a test file:
#(set-staff-size 20)
\score {
<<
\context Staff = flute { a4 b c d }
>>
}
I see that I left out \notes in this simple example but I was getting
the same failure with all the files I tested as I reduced the example
too far.
Paul
If you don't explicitly write out the duration of a note,
it gets the same duration as the previous note; c16 d e f.
It's exactly the same with chords; c16 e f
In your ex1, both chords get the same duration as the
first c'.
(By the way, have you learnt about \relative yet? It seems that
you would
Thanks to all who answered.
I promise to read the manual more thoroughly!
:-)
But I still don't understand why ex1 works!?
Thomas
> Hello,
>
> why does the 2nd example not work?
>
> ex1:
> --
> \score
> {
> \notes
> {
> c' c' ~
> }
> }
> \paper {}
> --
>
> ex2:
>
> --
> \score
> {
> \not
22 matches
Mail list logo
