On 16-Aug-05, at 10:17 PM, Will Oram wrote:
...but got nothing in the output. It looks more or less like the
snippet, says I.
Note the \layout. And please don't post incomplete snippets -- I had to
change your \relative dflat'' and \mlViolinOne/Two, since they weren't
defined. Here's an
Graham Percival wrote:
On 16-Aug-05, at 8:03 PM, D Josiah Boothby wrote:
Using the 2.6.0 autopackage on Debian sarge/sid, Evince (v. 0.3.0)
doesn't display the 3's in the time signatures.
Please file a bug report with evince, then. (?)
Looking more carefully
I don't know if -- or how
Just add the engraver handling the rehearsal marks to the Staff contexts
where you want the marks (by default, the engraver is only included
in the Score context):
music = \relative c'{
c d e f \mark \default |
g f e d \mark \default |
c1 |
}
\score{
\new StaffGroup
\new
It doesn't work directly since the default fonts and default
character encoding for fingerings can only handle numbers and are
different than for ordinary text. If you just want them placed
above or below the note, I propose to typeset them with a text
script instead:
c^↑
However, if you want
For the sake of completeness, I set the default version of ghostscript
to gs-gpl, ran the file through lilypond again, then viewed the file
with all of the pdf viewers that are on my system (which I believe to be
all of the pdf viewers available through the standard debian repositories).
Will Oram wrote:
Many orchestral scores have tempo changes and rehearsal marks appear
twice: once at the top (above the wind section) and once above the
string section. It's easy to get lilypond to print \mark once at the
top; can it be told to print it multiple times as described above?
On 17-Aug-05, at 12:47 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Just add the engraver handling the rehearsal marks to the Staff
contexts
where you want the marks (by default, the engraver is only included
in the Score context):
Out of interest, why doesn't it work if you add the engraver to the
StaffGroup?
D Josiah Boothby wrote:
For the sake of completeness, I set the default version of ghostscript
to gs-gpl, ran the file through lilypond again, then viewed the file
with all of the pdf viewers that are on my system (which I believe to be
all of the pdf viewers available through the standard
Hi folks!
I remember reading in here about emacs lilypond mode. I have just
rejigged xemacs for my text editing, and was wondering if someone could
point me to how to set that up, or if the latest, bleeding-edge version of
XEmacs for FreeBSD should include that.
Thanks
Fr. Gordon Gilbert
hi everybody!
what is the name of the default font for lilypond? i'm on os 10.4.2
and lilypond 2.6.3.
what would be the \layout command to globally set the font-size and -
type for lyrics and mark-up (i've seen it in the manual but never
really got it to work).
as always thanks a lot for
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:59:20PM -0700, D Josiah Boothby wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
On 16-Aug-05, at 8:03 PM, D Josiah Boothby wrote:
Using the 2.6.0 autopackage on Debian sarge/sid, Evince (v. 0.3.0)
doesn't display the 3's in the time signatures.
--- ---
I know what you are
As described at the top of
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Font-selection.html#Font-selection
the default font for most text output in LilyPond is New Century
Schoolbook. The same section also includes examples of how to modify
the font. However, you may have to
I use global blocks for many things. I tried applying them towards
rehearsal marks before writing in and got nothing. You sure you're not
using plain \markup for rehearsal marks?
Best,
Will
On Aug 17, 2005, at 3:45 AM, D Josiah Boothby wrote:
Will Oram wrote:
Many orchestral scores have
Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2005 12:25 schrieb Gordon Gilbert:
Hi folks!
I remember reading in here about emacs lilypond mode. I have just
rejigged xemacs for my text editing, and was wondering if someone could
point me to how to set that up, or if the latest, bleeding-edge version of
XEmacs
Then you might try something like this:
\version 2.6.0
global = {
\time 4/4
s1*3
}
Music = \new Voice { \relative c' {
c4 d e f \mark \default |
g f e d \mark \default |
c1 |
}}
\score {
\new StaffGroup
\new Staff \global \Music
\new Staff \global \Music
\new
Perhaps this is explained clearly elsewhere, but I have a question. I
have the following file compiling a score of a composition I just
wrote:
\include horn.ly
\include trumpet.ly
\include drums.ly
\include bass-tbone.ly
\header {
title = Ea
instrument = Trumpet in C, Horn in F,
Aaron Morse wrote:
Perhaps this is explained clearly elsewhere, but I have a question. I
have the following file compiling a score of a composition I just
wrote:
\include horn.ly
\include trumpet.ly
\include drums.ly
\include bass-tbone.ly
\header {
title = Ea
instrument =
I can't figure out how to install 2.6.0 from the internet or any other
wayit's tooo complicated. Do you have anybody who can help me via the
telephone, please?
Thanks
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hello,
is it possible to directly engrave percent repeat signs? As far as I
understand, the percent repeat mechanism always first engraves something
(notes, rests, etc.), and then engraves bars with repeat signs. I.e., if I do
\repeat percent 4 { r1 }
I get one bar with a rest, and then three
Do you have anybody who can help me via the telephone, please?
I'm new round here, but this sounds unlikely :)
I can't figure out how to install 2.6.0 from the internet or any other
wayit's tooo complicated.
It would help if you mention what computer and operating system you're
Claus Wilke wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to directly engrave percent repeat signs? As far as I
understand, the percent repeat mechanism always first engraves something
(notes, rests, etc.), and then engraves bars with repeat signs. I.e., if I do
\repeat percent 4 { r1 }
I get one bar with a
VSD wrote:
All,
it seems that Lilypond still manages the tied chords poorly, and the
ties in chords collide very often.
e.g. see:
http://personales.ya.com/v_s_d/tied_chords.png
imho this problem should be solved to avoid poor looking spots in the
otherwise gorgeously engraved lilypond
Hmmm, that's odd. When I tried the suggestion below, lily 2.7.5
processed for a moment, stopped quietly (no errors/warnings), and
brought up the PDF from the last successful build.
Let's go through the process. The following is the minimum code that
makes lily stop (although I kept it in
Ooooh, how aggrevating! Between what I originally had and the reduced
score presented here, I must've run lily on two or three intermediate
steps to make sure the bug was still appearing. Yet, the version I
submitted works for me too. Sounds like a heisenbug.
OK, let me start fresh. I can
On 17-Aug-05, at 7:09 PM, Will Oram wrote:
Hmmm, that's odd. When I tried the suggestion below, lily 2.7.5
processed for a moment, stopped quietly (no errors/warnings), and
brought up the PDF from the last successful build.
What's your OS / package / etc ? I just tried your example on a
Hi,
on my computer,
Lilypond does not compile files which contain japanese chars such that
utf-8.ly, sakura-sakura.ly, typography-demo.ly, since v2.5 until current CVS.
OS is Vine Linux 3.1 ( redhat clone ).
What would be wrong?
Below is an output of
lilypond --verbose input/sakura-sakura.ly 2
On 17-Aug-05, at 8:01 PM, Will Oram wrote:
OK, let me start fresh. I can confirm that this code does exactly what
I have already described. If it works for you, God hates me.
:)
Well, celebrate -- it crashes for me, too!
For some reason, it's the combination of \mark and \midi. Remove
the
Last question for awhile, I swear. :)
Under most circumstances \mark can lengthen the measure on which it
occurs to incredible lengths. However long the \mark \markup string is,
that much empty staff space sits underneath it down the system. Once
\mark ends, *then* the content of the measure
On 17-Aug-05, at 8:20 PM, Ishizaki wrote:
on my computer,
Lilypond does not compile files which contain japanese chars such that
utf-8.ly, sakura-sakura.ly, typography-demo.ly, since v2.5 until
current CVS.
OS is Vine Linux 3.1 ( redhat clone ).
Do you have all the extra fonts installed?
On 17-Aug-05, at 8:39 PM, Will Oram wrote:
Under most circumstances \mark can lengthen the measure on which it
occurs to incredible lengths. However long the \mark \markup string
is, that much empty staff space sits underneath it down the system.
Once \mark ends, *then* the content of the
On 17-Aug-05, at 10:29 PM, Will Oram wrote:
Really? I find it to be one of my more nagging problems, actually --
in past works I've had to replace \mark with \markup in order to
circumvent this weirdness.
This is a picture of the phenomenon:
Really? I find it to be one of my more nagging problems, actually -- in
past works I've had to replace \mark with \markup in order to
circumvent this weirdness.
This is a picture of the phenomenon:
http://www.foxchange.com/~spamguy/misc/images/longbar.jpg . Since I've
never used fatText,
32 matches
Mail list logo
