Hi all,
I am having some challenges getting grace notes to do
what I intended, with lyrics and also in combination.
The first case is as follows:
g'2\grace a'8( g'2 ) | g'2
ya-leh
with the slur the lyrics syllable is pushed to the
next beat
Do you want the percent signs already from the firs measure of the
piece? Otherwise, just do
\repeat percent 5 { previous measure }
Isn't this what you actually want to describe anyway? I don't understand
what you intend to use it for otherwise.
Example, a C major scaled followed by 4 bars of
On 17-Aug-05, at 10:57 PM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
The first case is as follows:
g'2\grace a'8( g'2 ) | g'2
ya-leh
with the slur the lyrics syllable is pushed to the
next beat
This has nothing to do with grace notes; this is the default
behavior of lyrics. To
You'll probably notice this before 2.7.6 is released, but just in case,
current
cvs has a problem with a key-change occuring at the end of the line:
it leaves space for the key change before the final bar line, then
prints
the key change after the final bar line (but still on the staff).
Erik
Graham Percival wrote:
On 17-Aug-05, at 10:57 PM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
The first case is as follows:
g'2\grace a'8( g'2 ) | g'2
ya-leh
with the slur the lyrics syllable is pushed to the
next beat
This has nothing to do with grace notes; this is the default
indeed, but it's actually wrong, since grace notes
are too short to sing
a syllable on.
I was hoping that was the answer I would get.
I am notating folk songs where there is indeed such
behaviour, i.e. the singer sings a syllable on a grace
note. Since they aren't trained musicians, I can't
Claus Wilke wrote:
[percent repeats without body]
as Mats pointed, it is of course possible to get this, just by putting
the last measure of the previous material in the \repeat. Of course,
then you can't do
\fragment
\repeat percent 4 { \skip 1 }
\otherFragment
\repeat percent
Hi again
hmn...
g'2\grace a'8( g'2 ) | g'2
ya-leh
What exactly is the slur here telling lilypond?
slur+lyric=?
It is obvious now that indeed the grace note is not
the issue, but the slur certainly is. The proof is
once I remove the slur all is well. Maybe
Will Oram wrote:
Ooooh, how aggrevating! Between what I originally had and the reduced
score presented here, I must've run lily on two or three intermediate
steps to make sure the bug was still appearing. Yet, the version I
submitted works for me too. Sounds like a heisenbug.
OK, let me
Aaron Mehl wrote:
indeed, but it's actually wrong, since grace notes
are too short to sing
a syllable on.
I was hoping that was the answer I would get.
I am notating folk songs where there is indeed such
behaviour, i.e. the singer sings a syllable on a grace
You can switch off the slur
Hello
I have found, that under Debian testing there is
problem with package clled ec-fonts-mftraced.
I have version 1.0.10a-1 installed. This is the part
of official apt-repository.
There is a bug - output of Lilypond files ahve very
ugly fonts for Titles or markup-texts.
I tried to install other
On 18-Aug-05, at 3:00 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Aaron Mehl wrote:
indeed, but it's actually wrong, since grace notes
are too short to sing a syllable on.
I was hoping that was the answer I would get.
I am notating folk songs where there is indeed such
behaviour, i.e. the singer sings a
Graham Percival wrote:
You can switch off the slur melismata. Check the manual for details.
OF course, that doesn't help if the rest of the piece does have slurs.
Well, you can just switch it on again, right? Isn't that what
\set ignoreMelismata = ##t
\unset ignoreMelismata
is for?
Yes indeed,
what would be nice would be another type of slur for
melismata. or maybe have a slur in the lyrics block,
that would make it an explicit slur for lyrics.
Aaron
indeed, but it defeats the purpose of the automatic
melismata, which is
that you don't have to worry about this kind of
Am 2005-08-17 um 18:03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
actually the links helped me a lot. navigating around the .pdf was
quite a pain in the a**, so i overlooked quite a lot of the crucial
infos.
But did you manage to set any font? How?
I found the hint that fontconfig sees from OSX's fonts
Well,
I looked at the comparison and my first reaction is
that this is not a fair deal.
They compare gui notation packages with lily?
What about a mup/abcm2ps/guido/musictex/philipswriter
etc comparison to lilypond.
Then we are comparing apples to apples.
BTW some of the outputs in the pdf
lomir.mid
Description: Binary data
Hi there!
Is it a known bug that 2.7.5 creates broken MIDIs, at least on OSX?
(I used 2.6.3 before, there it works.)
I attached a sample.
Greetlings from Lake Constance
---
fiëé visuëlle
Henning Hraban Ramm
http://www.fiee.net
On Thursday 18 August 2005 11.36, Aaron Mehl wrote:
I forgot to mention the version I am using if it
matters:GNU LilyPond 2.7.3
Also I didn't post the source since the lyrics are in
hebrew, if it is relevent I can output a png.
It's enough for us to see _an_ example that demonstrates it, it
Hi,
suddenly, the \break doesn't work with lilypond-book (version 2.6.3):
Any idea?
Wolfgang
#
\begin[staffsize=26]{lilypond}
emptymusic = {
\repeat unfold 2 % Change this for more lines.
{ s1 \break }
\bar |.
}
\new Score \with {
AM == Aaron Mehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AM They compare gui notation packages with lily?
AM What about a mup/abcm2ps/guido/musictex/philipswriter
AM etc comparison to lilypond.
I'd be interested in that, too. But so far not interested enough to
actually type in the abc or
Note that the current default behaviour in LilyPond
corresponds to
the typesetting practice used in most printed music.
Yeah I know
I will play with phrsing slurs, which I didn't see in
the doc for the latest development version, I hope
they still exist.
Aaron
/Mats
Aaron Mehl wrote:
Yes indeed,
what would be nice would be another type of slur for
melismata. or maybe have a slur in the lyrics block,
that would make it an explicit slur for lyrics.
One option is to use phrasing slurs, \(...\), for slurs that
shouldn't indicate a melisma and ordinary
I was thinking, why don't we just send the challenge
to the maintainers of each of those packages.
Is there a way to do it as a group. I mean not Laura
Conrad, Hans, Aaron etc but the lilypond users or
maybe send it back to the original person who did the
first 6?
Aaron
--- Laura Conrad [EMAIL
Hi,
I've been searching the docs, but can't figure out why this won't work...
Here's a faily minimal sample of what I'm trying to do.
\version 2.6.3
chordsOne = { \chords {
c2 c/e f g4:sus4 g
c1 es:dim
I couldn't figure this out..
Ver.2.7.4
The manual gives: -\_.. it doesn't work..
Best Regards,
Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Aaron Morse wrote:
On 8/17/05, John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please always tell which platform and which LilyPond version you
use!
Sorry, I completely forgot. I believe I have LilyPond 2.6.3 for
Windows on a system running Windows XP Home (Dell Dimension 2400, 256
MB RAM, etc.)
Christ van Willegen wrote:
Hi,
I've been searching the docs, but can't figure out why this won't work...
Here's a faily minimal sample of what I'm trying to do.
I would actually recommend you to explicitly write out the \score{...}.
Also, you are exploiting some more features of LilyPond
It seems that a few LaTeX command has survived in the manual by
mistake. The proper syntax is
c-_
/Mats
Mehmet Okonsar wrote:
I couldn't figure this out..
Ver.2.7.4
The manual gives: -\_.. it doesn't work..
Best Regards,
Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer
www.okonsar.com
I cannot repeat your problem here, but that's probably since
you didn't include the header of your LaTeX file. My guess is
that you have been hit by the problem discussed in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-08/msg00017.html
and some other emails to be found in the list
On 18-Aug-05, at 6:25 AM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
will play with phrsing slurs, which I didn't see in
the doc for the latest development version, I hope
they still exist.
Umm... 6.4.3? It's the section right after slurs.
- Graham
___
lilypond-user
Thank you very much, it works!
Wolfgang
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 16:50 +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I cannot repeat your problem here, but that's probably since
you didn't include the header of your LaTeX file. My guess is
that you have been hit by the problem discussed in
Do folks ever use a mix of \relative and absolute when entering music?
If you have:
\relative c {
block of music
}
{
2nd block of music
}
Is 2nd block still in relative mode?
How would you cancel relative mode?
Thanks
Steve
Dr. Stephan L. Moss
Sr.
Yeah I just looked at slurs and didn't see a link at
the bottom of the page to phrasing slurs
but now I see it.
thanks
:{)
Aaron
--- Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18-Aug-05, at 6:25 AM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
will play with phrsing slurs, which I didn't see
in
the doc for
On 18-Aug-05, at 10:59 AM, Stephan Moss wrote:
\relative c {
block of music
}
{
2nd block of music
}
Is 2nd block still in relative mode?
No. The relative mode ends with the }.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
34 matches
Mail list logo
