Why lilypond on windows is VERY slow?! It takes almost 30 seconds to
complete
something that compiles in less than a second on Fedora Core 4... I'm shocked.
For some reasons I can't use Fedora at home and it's very annoying to wait so
much for a little correction :( I thought lilypond is
Hi all!
I have composed a Missa Brevis (short Mass) setting with several distinct
pieces. In the past I have simply printed each piece out on separate
pages. However, I would like to put them all together in a book, with
title page, contents (with one-bar snippets if that's not too
Joe Neeman wrote:
Is is possible to tweak spanners by adjusting the endpoints
individually? For example, if I have a glissando from
bes to b, it gets obscured by the staff line. I'm looking for something
like
\once \override Glissando #'endpoint1-extra-offset = #'(0 . 1)
The same question
Hi all,
I'm in the process of switching more and more of my typesetting jobs from
Mup to Lilypond, but I have some trouble getting used to the way Lilypond
wants me to write every full staff and then combine them in a score.
I would rather write a few measures for every staff and then the next
I managed to do it using the \partial command in the following way:
\version 2.7.6
\score{
\relative c'' {
\repeat volta 2 {
\time 6/8
\partial 8
c8
c4. c4. |
}
\alternative {
{ \partial 8*5 c4. c4 }
{ c4. c4 }
}
\bar ||
\partial 8 c8 |
c2.
In addition to the other hints you have already received,
I have added some comments below.
Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote:
I'm xp celeron 512ram
I am still trying to put together a more complicated score of 7
different instruments including piano.
I took and modified the example in
Joe Neeman wrote:
Is is possible to tweak spanners by adjusting the endpoints
individually? For example, if I have a glissando from
bes to b, it gets obscured by the staff line. I'm looking for something
like
\once \override Glissando #'endpoint1-extra-offset = #'(0 . 1)
I don't think
Roman V. Isaev wrote:
Why lilypond on windows is VERY slow?! It takes almost 30 seconds to
complete
something that compiles in less than a second on Fedora Core 4... I'm shocked.
For some reasons I can't use Fedora at home and it's very annoying to wait so
much for a little correction
Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
I'm in the process of switching more and more of my typesetting jobs from
Mup to Lilypond,
good!
but I have some trouble getting used to the way Lilypond
wants me to write every full staff and then combine them in a score.
I would rather write a few measures for
I guess it's mostly a matter of getting used to it. However, you
can do something like
sopranoBlockI = {c d e f | g a d b}
altoBlockI = { a b c d | a b c d }
...
\ = { d e f g }
...
\score{
\context Voice = soprano {\sopranoBlockI sopranoBlockII ... }
\context Voice = alto {\altoBlockI
Mats- It was not until I actually could get an error log that I could
start to fix the file. However you have brought up a couple of things.
Last -first by changing the \score to new Staff from context I am now
able to get midi and pdf files to look at what it going on.
I am getting something
Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote:
Mats- It was not until I actually could get an error log that I could
start to fix the file. However you have brought up a couple of things.
Last -first by changing the \score to new Staff from context I am now
able to get midi and pdf files to look at
Am 11.09.2005 um 21:22 schrieb Henrik Frisk:
hi list,
back again with some problems: is there a way to put numbers on top
of each other. i need this for the funktionssbezeichnung (sorry, i
just know the german word). right now i'm using a mixture of \super
and \override TextScript
sorry, i wasn't really exact: i just realize my english is seriously
lacking some basic music- specific expressions. maybe this picture
makes cleare what I'm trying to do (this has been done with the \column
command):
Why don't you include also the .ly code you used for your
example, with
hi list,
back again with some problems: is there a way to put numbers on top
of each other. i need this for the funktionssbezeichnung (sorry, i
just know the german word). right now i'm using a mixture of \super
and \override TextScript #'extra-offset tweaking (picture attached),
which
Both the x86 2.7.9 full install and the upgrade die looking for glib on
Debian sid. 2.6.3.1 installs fine.
--
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Is there a way to do the following?
1. from this point, add -. to all notes
2. series of notes
3. from this point, normal behavior (i.e. no articulation by default)
Same question for all articulations or combination of articulations.
this would quicken the entry of long series of notes with
Hi,
I think LilyPond is a great
application and look forward to learning more about it as I use it. I recently installed Fedore
Core 4. I downloaded LilyPond version 2.6.3, i386 RPM and tried to install it. There was a problem. The version of Ghostscript
that is supplied with Fedora
On 09/12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Why lilypond on windows is VERY slow?! It takes almost 30 seconds to
complete
something that compiles in less than a second on Fedora Core 4... I'm
shocked.
For some reasons I can't use Fedora at home and it's very annoying to wait
so
much for
Hello,
Maybe this is a newbie question, but...
After upgrading to Sarge and LilyPond 2.4.0, I get errors on this
test.ly file:
melody = \notes {c e g b}
\score {
\melody
}
The errors I get are:
$ lilypond test.ly
lilypond:
Roman V. Isaev wrote:
Well, I have it both ways. It's slow if I use cygwin, it's slow
if I run it from cmd.exe prompt or drag a .ly file on its icon.
That's not the question. My question is whether you're using the
Native 2.6 binary (available from lilypond.org/web/install/ for the
On 12-Sep-05, at 9:22 AM, Johan Witters wrote:
After upgrading to Sarge and LilyPond 2.4.0, I get errors on this
test.ly file:
melody = \notes {c e g b}
2.4.0 no longer uses \notes. See the NEWS files.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
On 11-Sep-05, at 12:34 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Is there a way to do the following?
1. from this point, add -. to all notes
2. series of notes
3. from this point, normal behavior (i.e. no articulation by default)
See the tips and tricks; there's an example that does this.
Actually, I
On 09/12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Well, I have it both ways. It's slow if I use cygwin, it's slow
if I run it from cmd.exe prompt or drag a .ly file on its icon.
That's not the question. My question is whether you're using the
Native 2.6 binary (available from lilypond.org/web/install/
Roman V. Isaev wrote:
On 09/12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Well, I have it both ways. It's slow if I use cygwin, it's slow
if I run it from cmd.exe prompt or drag a .ly file on its icon.
That's not the question. My question is whether you're using the
Native 2.6 binary (available from
On 09/12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Well, I have it both ways. It's slow if I use cygwin, it's slow
if I run it from cmd.exe prompt or drag a .ly file on its icon.
That's not the question. My question is whether you're using the
Native 2.6 binary (available from lilypond.org/web/install/ for
On the download page, under the heading for version 2.6, the Fedora4
binaries are listed first. In the third text column (under Go here),
you are given the links to Download LilyPond, documentation,
Ghostscript, compatibility libraries. I would suspect that these links
will give you what you
On some configuration I found that initializing fontconfig can take
very much time, even if there are not many fonts.
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
MacUpdate (http://www.macupdate.com) is also receiving listings for
2.7.x versions. They, too, should be told not to accept them.
Will
Hi all,
I'm maintaining a listing for Mac LilyPond on VersionTracker. The
idea was to only list stable versions on that site, but somebody
keeps on
Paul Scott wrote:
Both the x86 2.7.9 full install and the upgrade die looking for glib on
Debian sid. 2.6.3.1 installs fine.
I'm not sure if this got through.
2.7.9 for x86 seems to still be broken for Debian sid.
Paul Scott
___
Paul Scott wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Both the x86 2.7.9 full install and the upgrade die looking for glib
on Debian sid. 2.6.3.1 installs fine.
I'm not sure if this got through.
Yes, it got through, but I haven't got time ATM to do anything about it.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL
Hello everyone,
Firstly the required out the way:
Platform: Windows XP
Lilypond Version: 2.7.8
I have been using the new version(s) of Lilypond for a while and
I find the us of PDF file a little annoying especially when fine tuning a score.
You have to remember to close out of the
Hello everyone,
Firstly the required out the way:
Platform: Windows XP
Lilypond Version: 2.7.8
I have been using the new version(s) of Lilypond for a while and I find the us of PDF file a little annoying especially when fine tuning a score. You have to remember to close out of the current
Mark, for best results, reply all, so that the community can either
benefit from the input here, or help.
Because I'm not a Fedora user, I can't tell you from experience how to
do most of what you're trying to do. Have you tried installing all of
the binaries from the download pages? It could
Dear all,
using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to \set tieWaitForNote = ##t but the program
seems not know this command and supposes typing errors. Can anybody give me
a hint how to solve this problem?
Thanks for answering in advance,
Martin
--
GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis!
2000 MB
35 matches
Mail list logo
