Hi all,
I was wondering if the close spacing at the start of a new system is a
bug or a feature (it seems like lily isn't padding the key signature).
The key signature at the start of each system may look like accidentals
that belong to the notes near them, but this is not the case. The part
of
The problem and its solution is described in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-11/msg00060.html
/Mats
Shamus wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if the close spacing at the start of a new system is a
bug or a feature (it seems like lily isn't padding the key signature).
The
I switch to lilypond-user...
So here is my problem :
%%
\header{
title = Staff.instr ?
}
musique = \relative {
c d e f g a b c \break
}
\relative { \set Staff.instrument = test
\set Staff.instr = first
\musique
\set Staff.instr = second
The problem is that \addlyrics doesn't really work that way, see Sect.
7.3.4 The Lyrics Context.
It seems that the following version actually does work:
pennsylvania =
\new Voice{\override NoteHead #'style = #'cross
r2_\markup{ shout } f8. f16 f8. f16 f4 f f8. f16 r4 }
\addlyrics {
Just tried swapping your version for mine. No improvement :-(
And I'm still getting programming error: moving backwards in time in
the logs ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 June 2006 11:34
To: Anthony Youngman
Cc:
I got the same programming error but still the output looked right
in the simplified example I tried. However, a better solution is to
use \lyricsto. For example, you can define a separate Voice context
for the music that the lyrics should follow and define a separate
identifier for the lyrics:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
\new Lyrics \lyricsto pennsylvania {
\pennsylvaniaLyrics \pennsylvaniaLyrics
}
This repetition of the same lyrics can of course also be obtained using
\repeat unfold 2 \pennsylvaniaLyrics
/Mats
___
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Papazian Christophe wrote:
I switch to lilypond-user...
So here is my problem :
%%
\header{
title = Staff.instr ?
}
musique = \relative {
c d e f g a b c \break
}
\relative { \set Staff.instrument =
Hi, Mats (et al.) --
The problem and its solution is described in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-11/msg00060.html
Well, a *related* problem and its solution is described there... ;-)
However, in general I have felt that beginning- and end-of-measure
spacing has
In fact, this is the same staff, but I would like to put some
information (this is not
the name of instrument) that changes during the music. I use one
staff, because bar numbers
and all others things are shared among the staffs...
I could do such a thing before, and now, I can't. Why ?
Is
Hi, Graham:
You're taking about the example in 4.1, right?
5.1, I believe.
... hmm, that example didn't turn out the way I hoped.
In general, it's a fine example. I think the confusion arises by not
using the same set of notes when switching between padding and staff-
padding: the
I wish to know why does midi2ly isn't working. I have Windows XP and it doesn't recognize the program. None of the other converters work, either.
Please, help.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Kieren,
For some reason I can't get your link working, but I
looked in the documentation again and did find a
command staffsize=ht, but that looks like it only
applies when using Lilypond-book. Are there any
non-lp-book uses for this?
Thanks,
Rick
--- Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, Rick!
For some reason I can't get your link working
Looks like server issues... =\
[The older, non-mirrored equivalent http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.8/
input/test/lily-1737238388.ly seems to work okay.]
Anyway, the example is
\relative c'
\new Staff
\with
{
fontSize
p.s. Graham -- shouldn't we try to implement some standards/
conventions within the various examples in different parts of the
documentation? e.g., here the Staff is explicitly instantiated
*WITHIN* a \relative block, whereas other docs have the other way
around, or use variables, or... I imagine
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The problem and its solution is described in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-11/msg00060.html
/Mats
Thanks for the tip. I'm curious though--why would such an important
feature not be turned on by default *and* not be mentioned in the
lilypond
Hi, Geoff:
I'm of two minds about this. Consistency does have strong advantages,
but when there are various ways to do the same thing, it can help to
see examples of all so that I can choose the one most appropriate for
what I want to do.
Agreed!
However, the particular example in question
Hi, Papazian:
Is there some (even complex) workaround ?
Try the attached -- it's a hack, but it does what you want (I think).
Best,
Kieren.
__
%%% CODE SNIPPET BEGINS
\version 2.9.7
\paper
{
indent = 0
left-margin = 2\in
line-width =
Hello,
I'm just wondering if there's a way to adjust the
angle of a crescendo or decrescendo. I'm copying a
piece into Lilypond, and some of the shorter cres.
follow the direction of the line (e.g. angling up with
an ascending line, down with a descending line). I
really like the look of it and
See the NEWS for version 2.9.
/Mats
Rick Hogg wrote:
Hello,
I'm just wondering if there's a way to adjust the
angle of a crescendo or decrescendo. I'm copying a
piece into Lilypond, and some of the shorter cres.
follow the direction of the line (e.g. angling up with
an ascending line, down
This was discussed in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-12/msg00043.html
/Mats
Shamus wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The problem and its solution is described in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-11/msg00060.html
/Mats
Thanks for the tip. I'm
The option staffsize=... in lilypond-book documents is
equivalent to #(set-global-staff-size ...) which is described
in the section on Setting Global Staff Size.
The question here was about getting different size of different
staves in the same score. The link in question was to the
example
Which version of LilyPond do you have installed?
/Mats
Ariel David Moya Sequeira wrote:
I wish to know why does midi2ly isn't working. I have Windows XP and
it doesn't recognize the program. None of the other converters work,
either.
Please, help.
Hi, Rick:
I'm just wondering if there's a way to adjust
the angle of a crescendo or decrescendo.
In v2.9, there is! ;-)
In the NEWS section of the documentation for v2.9, there is the
following example -- it demonstrates rotation of Hairpin and markup
(which require two different
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
...
However, in general I have felt that beginning- and end-of-measure
spacing has altered dramatically (not for the better) in the past
version or so -- you may remember several postings (by me and others)
on this issue.
For example, I now find that:
1.
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
In v2.9, there is! ;-)
In the NEWS section of the documentation for v2.9, there is the
following example -- it demonstrates rotation of Hairpin and markup
(which require two different methods):
{
\override Hairpin #'rotation = #'(20 -1 0)
g4\^\markup {
Hi, Mats:
The simple answer is probably that the changes you have noticed
are side-effects of several changes to the algorithms, that
presumably have improved lots of other aspects of the layout.
True -- and so much of what's happening is ab fab! =)
Best,
Kieren.
On 8-Jun-06, at 7:52 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Also for the record, I'm quite happy (once I'm finished composing this
opera I'm working on) to assume the role of Example-Code Janitor, to
ensure that all doc samples adhere to whatever standard(s) we agree
upon.
Ah, good. I was about to
On 8-Jun-06, at 6:04 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
I'd rather that the example was three systems or less, though.
I can easily make the *basic* example three systems or less.
However, I think (i.e., have recently been thinking) that there should
be, if possible, examples in (much) more depth
Hi, Graham:
We need to reduce this number, not increase it!
I have some ideas for combining tricks, regressions, and LSR.
In the perfect world, there would be only one, and links (or drill-
downs) would allow the user to see a given subject in more or less
detail. With today's technology,
Mats Bengtsson schreef:
This was discussed in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-12/msg00043.html
Thanks for the tip. I'm curious though--why would such an important
feature not be turned on by default *and* not be mentioned in the
lilypond manual? Or is having notes/rests
Hi, all --
Wow: I just realised the implication of the issue Papazian brought up...
If you can't use
\set Staff.instr = whatever
mid-stream to change the instrument name listed at the left-hand side
of the system, how do you keep track of the instrument being played
by
32 matches
Mail list logo
