Yes, particularly for basic stuff like this. You might encounter
the occasional example that doesn't work in 2.10, but those will
be relatively rare. IIRC everything in the LM will apply to 2.10
as well.
- Graham
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:56:07PM -0700, chip wrote:
So even though I am
Craig Bakalian wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone out there downloaded the LilypondTool jEdit and have
got it to work? I am just so cautious these days with java on Mac OS
10. I used to program heavily in java, but have not in 7 years. So, I
am not even up to date on the different names for the
Neil Puttock wrote Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:32 PM
2008/11/15 Jonathan Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Yes. Could you check the creation date of the large cache file,
and if that date is within your daylight saving period try
deleting the entire lilypond font cache, ie
coralline algae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thank you Johan that works nicely.
set ChordNames.midiInstrument
by way of explanation - with piano for the chords
it almost drowns out the melody line in midi playback
\set ChordNames.midiMaximumVolume = #0.5
or some other figure.
Many thanks, I've been looking for a way to do this for ages!
Martial-3 wrote:
hello
JeDit/LilyPondTool
menu Utilities
Global Options
in the pan left : Jedit
select shortcuts
in pan right at the top
select All or Plugin: lilyPondTool
bellow
Your example worked fine for me, Chip. Did you figure it out? (I went
to bed and missed all the fun.) If my minimal example wouldn't work then
you must have had a stray curly brace somewhere. What you want is to
put the transpose command in your score block here:
\new Staff
2008/11/16, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Read the bloody tutorial and LM 3. Particularly the syntax of a
lilypond file.
Particularly^2, the a \score contains a single music expression
part.
- Graham
Seriously, Graham, if you can't be nice and fuzzy, don't respond.
(Wasn't that
Dear Lilypond-users,
these days I found the great function with the slashed stems.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Special-rhythmic-concerns#Special-rhythmic-concerns
Unfortunately, in the below quoted example, it does not work with the beamed
notes.
\version 2.11.60
Do you mean you want to suppress the string numbers on the regular
staff? If I were you I would try making them transparent, much like you
did with the beams and stems on the TabStaff. Substitute StringNumber
where you put TabStaff.Beam.
Jon
coralline algae wrote:
Although I have used
Dear users.
i want to add pitch name (also octave) text all notes,
like following:
|
|| o
| o |
o|
e4 g4 c5
i know \easyHeadsOn but, it can not be output octave.
if possible rotate 90 degree pitch name.
for these text for KOTO: Japanese traditional instrument.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Neil, this seems to be at least one of the causes of the cache
rebuild problem. I've always had the Automatically adjust ... box ticked,
and have never experienced any problems, but then, my cache was first
built
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:34:15PM +0100, james bailey wrote:
2008/11/16, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Read the bloody tutorial and LM 3. Particularly the syntax of a
lilypond file.
Seriously, Graham, if you can't be nice and fuzzy, don't respond.
In general I do that. But Chip
Graham,
Would people rather get rude + accurate responses, or warm +
fuzzy + not solving the problem responses? I personally would
*much* rather get the former.
If the initial response to his question was read the 2.11 docs
about transposition and file syntax, the whole discussion would
have
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:12:56PM -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Graham,
If the initial response to his question was read the 2.11 docs
about transposition and file syntax, the whole discussion would
have been over in 2 or 3 emails.
So rather than making this yet another pissing contest
Graham Percival wrote:
If the initial response to his question was read the 2.11 docs
about transposition and file syntax, the whole discussion would
have been over in 2 or 3 emails.
Please note the first lines of my initial response to Chip:
For transposing from E-flat to concert pitch, see
Graham Percival wrote:
In defense of Jonathan, his responses *were* accurate; they were
just too polite. I mean, they were accurate and looked accurate,
but it invited a discussion about file syntax. We've spent about
Thanks Graham. I just sent an email defending myself but it's nice to
Amazing how this whole conversation got so blown apart. Anyway, In one
other post Graham you mention you probably shouldn't have used the word
'bloody' with someone who doesn't know you, and you're probably correct.
I took it as a English version of f we Americans probably would've
used.
chip wrote:
Amazing how this whole conversation got so blown apart.
That happens sometimes...
melody=, song=, notes= . \relative .
\score {
\new Staff \melody, song, notes .whatever was above
\layout {}
\midi {}
}
My original question was about the transpose option
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:23:54PM -0700, chip wrote:
Now I am looking through the 2.11 docs and searching (using my browsers
Find function) for Syntax and File Syntax and finding lots of entries
for Syntax but not File Syntax.
Oh bloody mao, here we go again.
Look here guys. I get
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
So I still don't know, is it working yet?!
Heheh, sorry for mentioning, yes it is working the way I expect it to.
Thankyou.
--
Chip
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
2008/11/16 Gil Cativo Atienza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
good evening,
i just downloaded lilypond version 2.10.33-1 on my laptop computer with linux
program.
i want to use lilypond musical notation on my personal music project but i
dont
know where to start.
hope you will be of assistance.
Better
Ok, I got it now, I'll read the 2.11 Learning Manual from cover to
cover. My problem is I tend to skip the stuff that *apparently* doesn't
apply to what I am doing - anything that has multiple stafs like grand
stafs, or lyrics. And that's probably not a good thing, I know. So I'll
try to be a
Hello Stefan,
A modification of this example in the LSR may be what you want:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=374
best,
V!ctor Adan
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Stefan Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Lilypond-users,
these days I found the great function with the slashed
After reading this thread, one thing is clear to me:
There is a point in the development course from stable to next stable,
where people should move to the current development release and forget
the old one. These days too many people uses 2.10 and its old
documentation. If a new user wants to
Ok, so after all is said and done in the other thread I started, here
goes another one - is there a proper upgrade path or do I just download
and extract the latest version over the top of the existing version? The
Application Usage document only mentions 'upgrade' in relationship to
There is a point in the development course from stable to next stable,
where people should move to the current development release and forget
the old one. These days too many people uses 2.10 and its old
documentation. If a new user wants to start using LilyPond, I
undoubtedly send him to
If you got it via the Synaptic Package Manager or Add/Remove Programs,
then remove the old version the same way before trying to install the
new one.
Jon
chip wrote:
Ok, so after all is said and done in the other thread I started, here
goes another one - is there a proper upgrade path or do
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I imagine that the reason many people still start out with 2.10.33 (on
Linux at least) is because 2.10.33 is the version in the repositories or
is even pre-installed in the distro (e.g. Ubuntu Studio). For these
cases there should perhaps be a warning about correct
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
If you got it via the Synaptic Package Manager or Add/Remove Programs,
then remove the old version the same way before trying to install the
new one.
Jon
Thanks Jon, got the 'older' version uninstalled the and new version
installed and made a new entry to my path so it
I just installed 2.11 and re-ran a piece that parsed fine in 2.10, and
you can see a warning message in the results below -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lilypond Que Bison Te Miras - alto.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.11.63
Processing `Que Bison Te Miras - alto.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 02:20:33PM -0700, chip wrote:
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
warning: Can't fit systems on page -- ignoring between-system-padding
The spacing is apparently a bit tight for 1 page, but lilypond has
decided that spreading it over 2 pages would look worse.
Hi,
I can do
\new Staff = FooBar ...
and
xxx = #(string-append Foo Bar)
\new Staff = \xxx ...
but not
\new Staff = #(string-append Foo Bar) ...
What is needed to get the last form working?
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Le 16 nov. 08 à 22:50, Johan Vromans a écrit :
Hi,
I can do
\new Staff = FooBar ...
and
xxx = #(string-append Foo Bar)
\new Staff = \xxx ...
but not
\new Staff = #(string-append Foo Bar) ...
What is needed to get the last form working?
That would require to change the parser.
Ok, I'll ignore, even though I prefer not to see errors and warnings.
Not that it matter, I'm just curious, in my code I don't adjust any of
the between systems padding, so what might be causing this? Is it
something in my code or just some oddity in lily?
--
Chip
Graham Percival wrote:
On
Le 16 nov. 08 à 23:15, chip a écrit :
Ok, I'll ignore, even though I prefer not to see errors and
warnings. Not that it matter, I'm just curious, in my code I don't
adjust any of the between systems padding, so what might be causing
this? Is it something in my code or just some oddity in
2008/11/16 Jonathan Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is a point in the development course from stable to next stable,
where people should move to the current development release and forget
the old one. These days too many people uses 2.10 and its old
documentation. If a new user wants to start
2008/11/16 chip [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Jon, got the 'older' version uninstalled the and new version
installed and made a new entry to my path so it will run from the command
line.
I recommend new Linux users to install as root, being the reason that
it is fully automatic. As normal user, on
I am getting the following diagnostics when I compile a lilypond file. I
still get an OK Pdf file, but how do I track down the cause in my
source code? Using --verbose just seems to develop a load of noise
in the log file. Does anyone have any more information on debugging
this, or does a
For what it's worth, remember that as documented on this forum, you
shouldn't have to uninstall 2.10 on Ubuntu Studio before you install a
newer version if you install in your home directory. The 'lilypond'
command calls LilyPond from the home directory before it looks for it
elsewhere. After
Hello,
My lilypond print jobs consistently disappear to dev null when I try to print
them with a free software tool such as kpdf or gpdf?! My printer is a pretty
standard laser printer, (HP Lasterjet 4 with PS support) connected via
parallel cable to a CUPS server. Most of the time it works
Federico == Federico Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Federico Hello, My lilypond print jobs consistently disappear to dev
Federico null when I try to print them with a free software tool such
Federico as kpdf or gpdf?! My printer is a pretty standard laser
Federico printer, (HP Lasterjet 4 with
Why isn't the effect of \unfoldRepeats in a \midi block the default
behaviour? If you're listening to a sound playback of your piece, don't
you want to hear it as it would be played rather than the computer
clunking along and playing all the \altenative bars one after another as
now?
How do I
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:03 PM, David Stocker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth, remember that as documented on this forum, you
shouldn't have to uninstall 2.10 on Ubuntu Studio before you install a newer
version if you install in your home directory. The 'lilypond' command calls
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:50:29AM +, Ian Hulin wrote:
Why isn't the effect of \unfoldRepeats in a \midi block the default
behaviour? If you're listening to a sound playback of your piece, don't
you want to hear it as it would be played rather than the computer
clunking along and
44 matches
Mail list logo
