Hi all,
does someone know how to force the alignment of bars in subsequent lines?
I mean. I would like to produce a regular score e.g. with 4 bars per line
and with a fixed length of each bar (eg, set to 1/4 of page width). I know
it is not always the best solution but sometimes it might be
I'd like to do something like this:
#(define baseTempo 50)
...
\tempo 4 = #baseTempo
...
\tempo 4 = #(* 2 baseTempo)
Is there a succinct way to do it?
Thanks,
-steve
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
No answer til now. Could anybody reproduce the problem?
Hoping for reply...
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Completion_heads_engraver-and-%5CnoBreak-tp29894579p29933011.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
From the answers I've had I infer that there is no standard way of doing
that.
The answer the closest from what I expected is to use a rehearsal mark
(thanks to Vicente). Unfortunately it doesn't work when the end-repeat
bar is the last bar of the score:
% This score doesn't have x4 printed
James a écrit , Le 11/10/2010 14:42:
If you say there is no 'alternate' then you simply make a text markup
saying 'repeat 4 times' - this is typically right aligned below or above
the stave where the repeat mark is.
Can I ask how do you achieve the right aligned 'repeat 4 times' in this
score?
Hello,
On 11/10/2010 13:22, Gilles Filippini wrote:
Hi,
From the answers I've had I infer that there is no standard way of doing
that.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Long-repeats#Manual-repeat-marks
AFAIK this is the standard if using Volte.
If you say there is
On 11 October 2010 15:13, Gilles Filippini gilles.filipp...@free.fr wrote:
Can I ask how do you achieve the right aligned 'repeat 4 times' in this
score?
I would do something like that:
\relative c'' {
\repeat volta 4 {
c1
% displayed at the end of a line and at the end of the score
an approach is:
\relative c'' {
\repeat volta 4 { c1 }
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #1
\mark \markup repeat 4 times
\bar :|
}
maybe you'll want to tweak it to fit the text over the measure!
Gilles Filippini wrote:
James a écrit , Le 11/10/2010 14:42:
If you
Hello,
On 11/10/2010 14:13, Gilles Filippini wrote:
James a écrit , Le 11/10/2010 14:42:
If you say there is no 'alternate' then you simply make a text markup
saying 'repeat 4 times' - this is typically right aligned below or above
the stave where the repeat mark is.
Can I ask how do you
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:22:36 +0200, Gilles Filippini
gilles.filipp...@free.fr wrote:
From the answers I've had I infer that there is no standard way of doing
that.
well, with Rehearsal Marks you can print almost whatever you want over a
bar line. how far is that from the standard way?
Hi,
when using \RemoveEmptyStaffContext, between-system-padding and
between-system-space seem to have no effect, the staff systems are
squeezed together with seemingly no vertical space between them.
Sorry if I'm missing the obvious. I tried to find information in the
doca about that but didn't
Dear community,
the tip I've got by madMuze was the right one for me.
Thaks!
You might try
\score {
\override Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn #'full-measure-extra-space =
#0
\new Staff { ...
to achieve pre-2.12 spacing.
___
Hello all,
I am finally trying to get past the basics with lilypond. In my
attempts, I have been copying a score that has divisi violas with a
downbow marker. My problem is that the text div. is rendered above
the downbow marker but I would like it to the left and lower.
Is it possible to move
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:51:19 +0200, David Santamauro
david.santama...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
r2 \mark \markup { \teeny div. } cs'4\downbow e'4
[...]
why do you use a rehearsal mark? by attaching the div. to the rest, the
result is closer to what you want, isn't?
r2-\markup { \teeny div.
Xavier Scheuer a écrit , Le 11/10/2010 16:08:
Can I ask how do you achieve the right aligned 'repeat 4 times' in this
score?
I would do something like that:
\relative c'' {
\repeat volta 4 {
c1
% displayed at the end of a line and at the end of the score
\once \override
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:51:19 +0200, David Santamauro
david.santama...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to move objects like that markup with the proper
directives? If it is and is documented, please point me to the relevant
snippets or section in the manual.
forgot that.
you can read about
Vicente Solsona a écrit , Le 11/10/2010 18:17:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:22:36 +0200, Gilles Filippini
gilles.filipp...@free.fr wrote:
From the answers I've had I infer that there is no standard way of doing
that.
well, with Rehearsal Marks you can print almost whatever you want over a
bar
Hi Vicente,
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:41:39 +0200
Vicente Solsona vice...@lavabit.com wrote:
you can read about that in the Learning Manual 4.5.1 Moving objects
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Moving-objects#Moving-objects
and more generally about text
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
When I put two voices on the same staff that have identical markings
for dynamics and tempo, Lilypond prints them both, one above the
other.
[...]
Back to my original question: if Lilypond can see that one of these
things needs to be moved, how hard
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
1) save typing
2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time guessing obvious things
and it can
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:40:30 +0200, Gilles Filippini
gilles.filipp...@free.fr wrote:
To me the standard way would be to have the Volta_engraver doing this
for me, and taking care not to do it when inside \unfoldrepeats {}.
afaik \unfoldRepeats is intended mainly for the output...
maybe you
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:32:48 +0200, James Wilkinson ji...@cs.cofc.edu
wrote:
[...]
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
[...]
you just need to create a third voice with spacers and all the common
marks, in parallel with the other two:
Took me a while
So I finally separated the dynamics from the notes, and it works!
But I had a couple of problems:
1) Whenever both instruments have a rest, Lilypond stacks them
vertically. James Bailey sent me a link to a snippet that fixes that.
(How did he know that was going to be my next problem?)
On 10/11/10 5:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
1) save typing
2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:06:26 +0200, James Wilkinson ji...@cs.cofc.edu
wrote:
On 10/11/10 5:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just
On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:58 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
So I finally separated the dynamics from the notes, and it works! But I
had a couple of problems:
1) Whenever both instruments have a rest, Lilypond stacks them vertically.
James Bailey sent me a link to a snippet that fixes that.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:57:42 +0200, Vicente Solsona vice...@lavabit.com
wrote:
afaik \unfoldRepeats is intended mainly for the output...
sorry I meant afaik \unfoldRepeats is intended mainly for the midi
output...
___
lilypond-user mailing
On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
1) save typing
2) help lilypond so it does't
Vicente Solsona a écrit , Le 11/10/2010 23:57:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:40:30 +0200, Gilles Filippini
gilles.filipp...@free.fr wrote:
To me the standard way would be to have the Volta_engraver doing this
for me, and taking care not to do it when inside \unfoldrepeats {}.
afaik \unfoldRepeats
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:00:28 +0200, Gilles Filippini
gilles.filipp...@free.fr wrote:
I thought I could trigger the mark using a function and a global
variable, but that doesn't work as expected. It seems the function is
evaluated only once while setting the toto part instead of being
evaluated
30 matches
Mail list logo
