From: Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net
I like however the page that allows to sync scores with youtube videos.
Check it out it's really nice. http://musescore.com/node/855
-- Marc
Any idea how they do that ?
Phil.
- Original Message -
From: Marco Correia marco.v.corr...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:35 AM
Subject: Odd output
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very possible that I'm making some
mistake.
When compiling this example:
\include
- Original Message -
From: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: Tremolo beams between more than two notes
Am Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2010, um 15:22:57 schrieb Phil Holmes:
Yes - the code gets confused
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear community,
I have a proplem with a large score.
When I run lilypond, I get at the end the error message
Preprocessing graphical objects...string:9:110: In procedure
procedure-name in expression
it's explained here: http://screenr.com/3L0
On Dec 10, 2010, at 3:32 AM, Phil Burfitt wrote:
From: Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net
I like however the page that allows to sync scores with youtube videos.
Check it out it's really nice. http://musescore.com/node/855
-- Marc
Any idea
Hello,
I just downloaded 2.13.42. When making parts, I see the log file has a new
thing. There are still many couldn't fit music on page if I use normal staff
size, but after that, a compressing music to fit message is added. Does it
mean I will be no longer worried about music fitting
Christopher Meredith schreef op do 09-12-2010 om 14:36 [-0600]:
Hi Christopher,
I'm not sure that's the link you intended to include. It just goes to
the MuseScore website.
Yes, I was a bit quick with this message. What I meant was the
share yours aspect of it -- although I imagined that it
I have around 2800 FB friends, nearly all of them musicians, and I plan to
do some Lilypond advocacy - hence my friend request. I'll need some 'backup'
debaters/advisors etc. and so if anybody would like to send me a friend
request, well the more the merrier. I think we can get quite a few
Isn't there a missing to pair with the ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
You get 2 stems because you created 2 voices with the signs and \\
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices.html
What are you trying to compose?
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Marco Correia wrote:
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
This is smart pr
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmusescore.org%2Fen%2Fabout%2Ftestimonialsh=cd3b2
also note they have 1500 fans on #fb today!
Greetings, Jan
I'm not sure that's the link you intended to
Thanks Carl, that's exactly what I was looking for.
Something I tried naively at first:
\parenthesize
\time 4/4
But \parenthesize seems only to work for notes, rests, and chords.
-Jonathan
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
Mike Blackstock schreef op do 09-12-2010 om 17:06 [-0800]:
Hi Mike,
I have around 2800 FB friends, nearly all of them musicians, and I
plan to do some Lilypond advocacy - hence my friend request. I'll need
some 'backup' debaters/advisors etc. and so if anybody would like to
send me a friend
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to serve
as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly - it is
plain wrong!
Why doesn't the accidental_engraver looks into
I prepared a simple lilypond example which shows some simple things. I can
send
that to you or others if you were interested. It uses lilypond within LaTeX to
show the simple stuff using a famous tune, plus it gets a little more elaborate.
I only include attachments if people request them,
Please reply to the user group as well.
As is often pointed out, it's free software and the fixes depend on who is
working for nothing on the code.
I wouldn't think it would crop up frequently.
I made a workaround with a combination of forcing the accidentals to be
displayed, and then using
Hello
On 10/12/2010 07:43, Jan Warchoł wrote:
Seriously though, have you considered changing the default font for chords?
Oh yes, but only to make it smaller, I prefer mine '12% smaller' than
default, but the 'sans' font I think, is how chord names should be
displayed.
I know it's a
Jonathan,
On 10/12/2010 03:41, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
But \parenthesize seems only to work for notes, rests, and chords.
Yes this feature was introduced in 2.13.x.
You are using 2.12.x I see?
So you have the option of using what is in the LSR or using the
'unstable' to 2.13.41 or 42 and
Why not set one of the notes to a different enharmonic pitch? It's
certainly much kinder to the musician who's trying to play the composition.
\include english.ly
{
\clef treble
\time 4/4
{ fs'4 }
\\
{ es'4 }
}
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Hi !
This coould be seen as a special time signature.
I've been recently told (forgive me, you who told me : I can't remmeber
who you were, anyway some great person :-D ) how to mix a glyph and a
time,signature : you could probably adapt this trick (I couldn't ! :'( ).
\version 2.13
%%
If you check, you'll see that there's an F# and an Fnat in different voices,
but they're not shown as separate notes. It's a bug I reported earlier this
year.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net
To: Marco Correia marco.v.corr...@gmail.com
Cc:
As I replied in my direct reply - because it's not right. I asked a friend who
teaches music about the Mikado problem I had and he said:
Key- C major
Bass note pedals - C-G C-G etc.
Chord in Bar 1 G7 (G B D Fnat = dominant 7th); Chord in Bar 2 C major (CEG)
Each bar has a melody which uses
Because spelling counts! D# and E♭may sound the same (on a tempered instrument)
but they are two very different notes. And an performer playing an instrument
that can distinguish between the two, should.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Michael Ellis wrote:
Why not set one of the notes to a
Your friend is absolutely correct for that particular case. Sullivan chose
the lesser of two evils. Misspelling the dominant chord would have been
confusing to the pianist and spelling the vocal line as A G Gb G would have
looked weird to the singer. My response was directed to the original
I managed to post in the list as a new subscribed user, but couldn't reply.
I received this:
Your request to the lilypond-user mailing list
Posting of your message titled vimLilypond learning
curve_jazzchord font_bars per line? 3
questions has been rejected by the list moderator. The
Yes! Spelling does count because poorly spelled music is much harder to
read. I'm somewhat less convinced regarding sonic differences on untempered
instruments because the matter is more complicated than that, e.g G# as the
leading tone to A is different from G# as the third of E. In practice, it
I'd say it's up to more than just the performer's ear to make the distinction.
If you spend much time listening to music where enharmonic notes are rounded to
a median, the ability of the listener/performer to distinguish the difference
diminishes. So the audience is just as at fault at not
I'm not sure whether this is the right place to post this.
I've got an issue with the pdf previewer that comes with LilypondTool. When
I open jEdit and start typing, it looks fine. However, as soon as I use
jEdit to compile the text, the viewer starts doing weird things:
Dear list members,
I'm having a problem with tuplets displaying correctly in certain situations but
not in others.
for example, the following works fine on its own:
\time 4/4
c32 c c16
\times 8/7 {c16 c c c c c32 c c16}
\times 7/6 {c c c c c c }
\times 5/4 { c16 c c c32 c }
\times 4/3
I stumbled upon this picture of notation and I've never seen the final note (in
each voice, the right page voices have a slightly different version)
http://anaigeon.free.fr/mes_facs/fsjosq.jpg
From the position it must be a longa, the fermata over it indictates the same.
Best visible on the top
Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com writes:
Yes! Spelling does count because poorly spelled music is much harder
to read. I'm somewhat less convinced regarding sonic differences on
untempered instruments because the matter is more complicated than
that, e.g G# as the leading tone to A is
On 21:32, Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Nils Gey wrote:
I stumbled upon this picture of notation and I've never seen the final note
(in each voice, the right page voices have a slightly different version)
http://anaigeon.free.fr/mes_facs/fsjosq.jpg
From the position it must be a longa, the fermata over
dear list,
how would I code a tuplet group whose first notes are a subdivision of the
tuplet note?
for example: 16th note triplets that begin with 2 32nd notes.
thanks!
Sepand
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:40:15 +
Owain Sutton m...@owainsutton.co.uk wrote:
On 21:32, Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Nils Gey wrote:
I stumbled upon this picture of notation and I've never seen the final note
(in each voice, the right page voices have a slightly different version)
It appears to be the opening Kyrie of the Josquin's Missa Beata Virgine, ca
1510.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Josquin_Missa_BV_Kyrie.jpg
I believe music printing was a thriving enterprise by then, so it's unlikely
to be (completely) hand scribed.
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at
Sepand,
Durations in tuplets work just like those outside of tuplets. Sixteenth note
tuplets that begin with 32nd notes would look like this:
\times 2/3 { c32 c c16 c }
Cheers,
Nick
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Sepand Shahab
sepandsha...@alum.calarts.edu wrote:
dear list,
how would I
Thanks. Then, is anyone able to let Lilypond break the non-fittable line into
the next page? Why it insists in putting such line on the current page? This
issue of ten jars with nine lids (a Chinese idiom) must be solved, otherwise
1. every part must use different staff size; and 2. I must
Hello,
I am not sure if you are aware of this website
http://www.diamm.ac.uk/index.html
It contains very high resolution digital images of mensural music. You do need
to register (free) but some of the images there are beautiful.
James
-Original Message-
From:
2010/12/10 Ludo Beckers lazy...@gmail.com:
I never got a reply though. Any idea why my subscription was first accepted
and
then rejected on the same day?
Do you have several From: lines to choose from in Gmail? This could be
the cause, you shoud always write to the list with the same From:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:49 PM, George_ georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure whether this is the right place to post this.
The LilyPondTool mailing may be more appropriate.
I've got an issue with the pdf previewer that comes with LilypondTool. When
I open jEdit and start typing, it
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Sepand Shahab
sepandsha...@alum.calarts.edu wrote:
For example if you take what's above and put it in the
left hand of a piano part, then take the exact same music, shift it over by
one
measure and place it in the right hand, something goes wrong. why?
It
Hi. I wrote a program in C that finds the solutions, if any exist, to a
compositional problem specified in the command line. One of the output
formats is lilypond. Some of the solutions involve clusters that lilypond
does not display very well--noteheads overlap vertically, making them
illegible,
Thanks for the tip. I was wondering how to do multiple columns of lyrics.
harry
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2010-11-29 um 22:15 schrieb hsweet:
This is a template I've been slowly evolving to use for charts for
my band.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p30334633/lead_sheet_template.ly
Hi,
I didn't want to sound rude or anything. I just want to make a point that I do
not consider this as a minor improvement since:
1. The output is not aestetically wrong, it is definitely readable differently
from what is specified in the lilypond source.
2. I think you should not assume the
On 12/10/10 8:27 PM, Marco Correia marco.v.corr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I didn't want to sound rude or anything. I just want to make a point that I do
not consider this as a minor improvement since:
1. The output is not aestetically wrong, it is definitely readable differently
from
45 matches
Mail list logo
