Hi all,
I've been following (through google) the current
progress of microtonal notation in LilyPond,
and as of September of 2009, there still
seemed to be large amounts of trouble with
microtonal notation in general, and the website
that David Keenan had at bigpond:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:21:30 +1100
> From: Nick Payne
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: how to make a songbook
> Message-ID: <4ee6705a.5050...@internode.on.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> On 13/12/11 03:10, Christian McConnell
Hi Zoltan,
2011/12/11 Zoltan Selyem :
>
> Hi all,
>
> When the lyrics begin with a stanza number, the number doesn't take up
> space in the score (as it can be seen in the attached example).
>
> When the stanza number is in the middle of a line, the number does
> take up space, moving the notes ap
Hello,
On 8 December 2011 22:28, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> 2011/12/8 m...@apollinemike.com :
>> Le Dec 8, 2011 à 1:30 AM, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>>
>> I worked on this for a long time. It is near impossible to get stems to
>> link up to glissandos and automate direction of stems @ th
On 13/12/11 03:10, Christian McConnell wrote:
The solution is simple: use vector graphics. Added bonus: with an svg,
you can tweak the details (spacing, etc.) in Inkscape, really easily.
I do that, then save as an eps, and then put it into Scribus. It's a
few steps, to be sure, but I love the
George,
On 10 December 2011 17:45, George_ wrote:
>
>
> pkx166h-2 wrote:
>>
>> George,
>>
>> On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu wrote:
>>
>>> Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't
>>> work, but it doesn't help much...
...
> I agree, the 2.15 docs seem to have it
The solution is simple: use vector graphics. Added bonus: with an svg, you can
tweak the details (spacing, etc.) in Inkscape, really easily.
I do that, then save as an eps, and then put it into Scribus. It's a few steps,
to be sure, but I love the results.
Chris McConnell
Message: 4
Date: Mo
On 12/12/2011 10:42 AM, Peter Gentry wrote:
> Apologies if this is a trivial question - I have spent some time
> searching the manuals without success.
> I have a four movement trio which outputs the score correctly but the
> MIDI output does not process any of the repeats Volta percent tremolo
> e
Hi Peter,
try here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/repeats-in-midi.html
Best,
Robert
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011, at 03:42 PM, Peter Gentry wrote:
> Apologies if this is a trivial question - I have spent some time
> searching the manuals without success.
> I have a four movement
Apologies if this is a trivial question - I have spent some time searching the
manuals without success.
I have a four movement trio which outputs the score correctly but the MIDI
output does not process any of the repeats Volta
percent tremolo etc. I have noted the unfold directive but does this
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 07:06:56AM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
> FWIW, I've found that GUB on x86-64 Oneiric will choke building
> cross-compiled components, with error messages saying "unable to
> identify extension of x", where x is the x.o form of a tool. This
> points, according to GCC, to m
On 11-12-12 04:16 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
STABLE RELEASE
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention, they get updated docs and bugfixes and
new features into the hands of users, etc. We had the first two
release candidate
On 12 December 2011 06:49, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:20:30AM -0500, Father Gordon Gilbert wrote:
> > OOoh! What should I be looking for? So far in the OOo document the
> > display looks fine. Even at fairly high magnitude. My son also made
> > a cryptic comment abou
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:20:30AM -0500, Father Gordon Gilbert wrote:
> OOoh! What should I be looking for? So far in the OOo document the
> display looks fine. Even at fairly high magnitude. My son also made
> a cryptic comment about 300 dpi. I *am* prepared to give this up as a
> lost cause
> --
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:49:46 +0100
> From: David Kastrup
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: how to make a songbook
> Message-ID: <87iplmcmid@fencepost.gnu.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Father Gordon Gilbert writes:
>
>> Good n
> --
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:49:46 +0100
> From: David Kastrup
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: how to make a songbook
> Message-ID: <87iplmcmid@fencepost.gnu.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Father Gordon Gilbert writes:
>
>> Good n
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hello David,
> thank you for this detailed answer!
> Well, I don't agree in doing an awkward thing, using 2.14.
Duration arguments in Lilypond 2.14 are awkward without you being at
fault. There is a reason even a very simple command like \skip had to
be implemented in
Hello David,
thank you for this detailed answer!
Well, I don't agree in doing an awkward thing, using 2.14. But I
probably should not name shortcuts extensions.
When I am working on a collection of pieces to be printed, I am using
current *stable* version. While I'm working on them, I sometimes
18 matches
Mail list logo
