Automatic beams

2012-04-08 Thread Helge Kruse
Hello, I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more declarative as described in notation reference 1.2.4 Beams. In this measure I

Automatic beams

2012-04-08 Thread Helge Kruse
Hello, I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more declarative as described in notation reference 1.2.4 Beams. In this measure I

Re: non-standard mensural clef

2012-04-08 Thread Wasil Sergejczyk
yes, they seem like petrucci c-clefs, at least they fit. thank you for your help. 2012/4/8 James pkx1...@gmail.com Hello, On 7 April 2012 15:57, Wasil Sergejczyk szelga@gmail.com wrote: i'm trying to re-create this hymn and i've stumbled upon the clef(s) i didn't find in lilypond

\cadenzaOn + accidental-style not working

2012-04-08 Thread Wasil Sergejczyk
when i set \cadenzaOn, set-accidental-style has no effect. do i use it correctly? is it a bug or a feature? are there any workarounds? \version 2.15.36 \include italiano.ly global = { \cadenzaOn \key do \major \autoBeamOff \pointAndClickOff \override Staff.NoteHead #'style = #'altdefault

Re: Multiple-staff ossia

2012-04-08 Thread wjm
Greetings, A possible solution using a markup, I guess, although it is a somewhat messy solution requiring a bit of fiddling with the numbers indicated. The numbers chosen depend on the length of the required staff-name in the markup. If the X value doesn't move the markup far enough to the

Re: \cadenzaOn + accidental-style not working

2012-04-08 Thread James
Hello, On 8 April 2012 10:36, Wasil Sergejczyk szelga@gmail.com wrote: when i set \cadenzaOn, set-accidental-style has no effect. do i use it correctly? is it a bug or a feature? are there any workarounds? Remember when you set a \cadenzaOn it is like one giant *single* measure - even if

Multimeasure rests over a cadenza

2012-04-08 Thread James Harkins
Hi, I am perfectly ripping my hair out trying to get multimeasure rests to display properly in another staff, over a cadenza. Reduced example illustrates. I don't get the barcheck errors if I replace the mm-rests with spacers, but then I don't get the whole-rest symbols in the empty bars, and

Re: Automatic beams

2012-04-08 Thread Hans Aikema
On 8-4-2012 12:50, Helge Kruse wrote: Hello, I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more declarative as described in notation

Re: \cadenzaOn + accidental-style not working

2012-04-08 Thread Wasil Sergejczyk
oops, sorry, i put #(set-accidental-style 'forget) in the wrong place. all works npw. 2012/4/8 James pkx1...@gmail.com Hello, On 8 April 2012 10:36, Wasil Sergejczyk szelga@gmail.com wrote: when i set \cadenzaOn, set-accidental-style has no effect. do i use it correctly? is it a bug

Re: Multimeasure rests over a cadenza

2012-04-08 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi James, On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am perfectly ripping my hair out trying to get multimeasure rests to display properly in another staff, over a cadenza. Reduced example illustrates. Possibly the following thread will be useful to

Re: Automatic beams

2012-04-08 Thread Hans Aikema
On 8-4-2012 16:26, Hans Aikema wrote: On 8-4-2012 12:50, Helge Kruse wrote: Hello, I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more

Re: Multimeasure rests over a cadenza

2012-04-08 Thread Thomas Morley
Am 8. April 2012 16:39 schrieb David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com: Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:  http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg68492.html HTH, David Hi David, you were faster. :)) -Harm ___

Re: Automatic beams

2012-04-08 Thread -Eluze
Helge Kruse-4 wrote: In this measure I want to break up the sextuplets in treble to a 3+3 group. The semiquavers should be grouped 2+2. The quavers in the base staff should be grouped 2+2. I can change the beaming with beatStructure, but baseMomemt doesn't change anything. I also

musicxml2ly

2012-04-08 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
Hi, There have been many requests from several people for Lilypond-to-MusicXML conversion. I am not going to repeat that question. We do have a musicxml2ly script. I have tried it with many example xml and mxl files from here: http://www.makemusic.com/musicxml/music/example-set and here:

Re: musicxml2ly

2012-04-08 Thread James
Hello, On 8 April 2012 17:47, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: ... Or are many problems already known? http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2q=musicxmlsort=prioritycolspec=IDx=typey=prioritymode=gridcells=tiles There is also this recent - seemingly unfinished patch

Re: Automatic beams

2012-04-08 Thread Nick Payne
On 08/04/12 18:39, Helge Kruse wrote: Hello, I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more declarative as described in notation

Re: Multimeasure rests over a cadenza

2012-04-08 Thread James Harkins
At Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:39:13 -0500, David Nalesnik wrote: Hi James, Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:  http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg68492.html Thanks, this is a lot closer. (By the way, it seems that mail-archive is on the wrong side of the Great