Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/6/2 diekunstderfuge dolcevitafinea...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I'm trying to achieve the compound time signature seen in the image here:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p33950720/custom_time_signature.png
As you can see, it's meant to
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:29 AM, diekunstderfuge
dolcevitafinea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still using 2.12.3 because that is what the Lilypond download site lists
as the latest stable version for Windows. Where can I find 2.14.2, and how
could I install it while keeping 2.12.3 in case I need to
Hello *,
is there a way to make a visible note silent? It should be displayed when
creating PDF, but not played when creating MIDI output. Or do I have to
replace these notes by silences in my LY file for generating the MIDI file?
I know the \killCues command for cue notes, but how do I remove
On 6/4/12, ornello dominik.hoer...@fun.de wrote:
Hello *,
is there a way to make a visible note silent? It should be displayed when
creating PDF, but not played when creating MIDI output. Or do I have to
replace these notes by silences in my LY file for generating the MIDI file?
I know the
Hello Hwaen,
thanks for your hint. But I think tags are not exactly what I am looking for
because they do not make notes silent but completely remove them from the
score. This may work for notes without duration (e.g. trills or grace notes)
but not for notes with duration to keep the music
ornello dominik.hoer...@fun.de writes:
Hello Hwaen,
thanks for your hint. But I think tags are not exactly what I am looking for
because they do not make notes silent but completely remove them from the
score. This may work for notes without duration (e.g. trills or grace notes)
but not for
Hello David,
dak-3 wrote:
You can have one tag for the note, and one tag for a silent replacement,
and then remove one in the midi version, and one in the printed version.
I see. But this forces me write everything twice. Isn't there an easier
solution to set the volume = 0 for a note?
- Original Message -
From: ornello dominik.hoer...@fun.de
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Make visible note silent
Hello David,
dak-3 wrote:
You can have one tag for the note, and one tag for a silent replacement,
and then remove one in
I've just rewritten a piano score to use piano-centred dynamics, and it
has had the unfortunate side-effect of de-justifying the last system,
similar to setting ragged-last = ##t.
Is this a known bug (I've searched already!) and is there a workaround?
(Explicitly setting ragged-last = ##f
On 4 juin 2012, at 01:47, Hilary Snaden wrote:
I've just rewritten a piano score to use piano-centred dynamics, and it has
had the unfortunate side-effect of de-justifying the last system, similar to
setting ragged-last = ##t.
Is this a known bug (I've searched already!) and is there a
Hi David,
Your screenshot shows Page 236 of 770, never mind the page number on
the actual page itself.
For the record, I *always* refer to the page number visible on the page when
printed, since that's the only one that uniquely identifies the same page in
both electronic and printed
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net
On 30/05/12 02:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
One of the problems of LilyPond is that C++ had very poor support for
things we desperately need: reflection, automatic memory management
and
From: Tim McNamara
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net
On 30/05/12 02:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
One of the problems of LilyPond is that C++ had very poor support
for
things we desperately need: reflection,
Am 04.06.2012 12:11, schrieb ornello:
Hello *,
is there a way to make a visible note silent? It should be displayed when
creating PDF, but not played when creating MIDI output. Or do I have to
replace these notes by silences in my LY file for generating the MIDI file?
I know the \killCues
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/6/2 diekunstderfuge dolcevitafinea...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I'm trying to achieve the compound time signature seen in the image here:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p33950720/custom_time_signature.png
Jeff Barnes wrote:
While I'm sensitive to David's request to end the discussion for now, there
are some misconceptions about Qt that need addressing.
That's not entirely clear. The discussion was originally about the
choice of Scheme as an extension language. Qt is clearly not an answer
to
From: Tim Roberts
Jeff Barnes wrote:
While I'm sensitive to David's request to end the discussion for
now, there are some misconceptions about Qt that need addressing.
That's not entirely clear.
I don't think starting from here is fair, Tim. You didn't quote enough context.
The
Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com writes:
From: Tim Roberts
In what way does Qt represent an extension strategy?
Using C++ to extend Lily.
C++ is not useful for extending LilyPond. It is its skeleton substance,
but is not user serviceable. Qt would not change that.
With the benefit that
Dear fellow-users,
After failing to write what I thought should be a fairly simple
define-music-function, I thought, this is it: Learn something about Scheme
in a more structured way, old chap! One can only go on for so long relying
on the (invariably kind and expert, and mostly very patient)
2012/6/4 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/6/2 diekunstderfuge dolcevitafinea...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I'm trying to achieve the compound time signature seen in the image here:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
It is much more straightforward to add
\alias Staff
to the definition of the TimeSig context. Then any overrides for Staff
issued within TimeSig will not get handed upstairs.
This should probably be added to the LSR snippet: while it does
On 2012-06-04 14:18, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 4 juin 2012, at 01:47, Hilary Snaden wrote:
[Supposed bug report snipped.]
My guess (long shot) would be that if you're using a Dynamics context,
there may be extra space in the context that is pushing it to the end
of the line whereas
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
Let me try to rephrase things: the more functionality is moved into
the Scheme layers, the less people you can find who are capable of
working on it.
For me, the complexity of LilyPond itself
23 matches
Mail list logo
