Re: Objects as links

2012-12-31 Thread Federico Bruni
Il 31/12/2012 00:44, Noeck ha scritto: These include … ‘\alterBroken’, … ‘\hide’, ‘\omit’, ‘\overrideProperty’, … I've read about those commands now several times (in this context of changes to 2.17) and I am curious what they do. But I could not find any explanation for most of them (I

Re: Objects as links

2012-12-31 Thread Richard Shann
Thanks to everyone who responded - I got that working ok. My use for this stuff is allowing Wysiwyg operations on the LilyPond typeset score from inside Denemo. I am guessing that there are strict limitations here, to do with what constitutes a grob. The original email from Noeck included beams as

Re: Objects as links

2012-12-31 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: 2012/12/30 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net writes: I too am very interested in adding links to objects, but when I paste your example into lilypond version 2.16.0 I get syntax errors - is it specific to

Re: set override documentation

2012-12-31 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/12/31 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de: Hi, Is there any situation where I can use both and it is an advantage that I can distinguish between them? Is there a difference for the user (exept that it is a different thing internally)? This page is a bit short:

Re: Objects as links

2012-12-31 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/12/31 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com: [...] Perhaps I should add it to the LSR. I've put a revised, more elegant (hope so) version into the LSR. Preview at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=865 Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user

dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? smorz = \markup { \italic smorz } sotto = \markup { \italic { sotto voce } } Ds = { s1*10 | s1^\sotto | s4 s2.\f | s4 s2.^\smorz | s1\p | s1\pp | s1*2 | s2 s\ | s4 s8. s16\f\ s4 s8.\! s16

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:22 PM Subject: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? smorz =

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 31 December 2012 15:22, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote: How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? (snip) If I use \Ms \\ \Ds the dynamics will come out to the left (compared to the in the notes version), probably since the

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
Phil Holmes: ... How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? smorz = \markup { \italic smorz } sotto = \markup { \italic { sotto voce } } Ds = { s1*10 | s1^\sotto | s4 s2.\f | s4 s2.^\smorz | s1\p | s1\pp | s1*2 | s2 s\

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
Xavier Scheuer: On 31 December 2012 15:22, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote: How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? (snip) If I use \Ms \\ \Ds the dynamics will come out to the left (compared to the in the notes

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 5:01 PM Subject: Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry I think I like the \new Dynamics version best if I could get the same space above and under the dynamics as

Notation Reference 1.2.3, Unmetered music: cadenza and bars

2012-12-31 Thread Federico Bruni
Hi all while translating this chapter I've come across this sentence: A new bar is never started within a cadenza, even if one or more \bar commands are inserted within it. Therefore, reminder accidentals will need to be added manually. See Accidentals. c4 d e d \cadenzaOn cis4 d cis d

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
Phil Holmes: I think I like the \new Dynamics version best if I could get the same space above and under the dynamics as for the within notes case. As a general rule (and this would appear to include the music you're setting) dynamics for singers are put above the staff, to avoid problems

Re: Notation Reference 1.2.3, Unmetered music: cadenza and bars

2012-12-31 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 31.12.2012 18:53, schrieb Federico Bruni: A new bar is never started within a cadenza, even if one or more \bar commands are inserted within it. Therefore, reminder accidentals will need to be added manually. See Accidentals. So what's the point of that sentence? The sentence tells us the

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Karl, Lilypond default seems to have it below. That's because dynamics for [almost?] all non-vocal instruments are engraved below the staff. I have defined a VocalStaff context, with all the appropriate #'direction = #UP overrides — this makes it very easy to add a vocal line without

!Happy new year

2012-12-31 Thread Stjepan Horvat
-- Nesmotren govori kao da mačem probada, a jezik je mudrih iscjeljenje. Izreke 12:18 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread James Bailey
On Dec 31, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote: How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? smorz = \markup { \italic smorz } sotto = \markup { \italic { sotto voce } } Ds = { s1*10 | s1^\sotto | s4 s2.\f | s4

Scheme global variables in Lilypond

2012-12-31 Thread Nick Payne
In the following lilypond code, why is the value of the scheme variable dirn not being changed by the set! command in the updown function? The updown function is called on the first line of beginStringNum, and here returns the value DOWN, as shown by the TextSpanner appearing below the staff,