Speaking about LilyPond on Linux... yesterday I've seen that version 2.16
is still in debian experimental:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=lilypond
The next Debian stable, which is going to be released in a few days, will
have 2.14 again. Hopefully 2.16 will be added to backports in
David Kastrup writes:
Ask Wilbert about the LyBoek project...
Is that a work title?
Yes.
The official title is Liedboek, as in URL:http://www.liedboek.nl/
Indeed.
An exposition of the project logistics would be interesting, yes.
Yes, there are plans for a writeup of the project.
Jan
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
Speaking about LilyPond on Linux... yesterday I've seen that version
2.16 is still in debian experimental:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=lilypond
The next Debian stable, which is going to be released in a few days,
will have 2.14
2013/4/24 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
The next Debian stable, which is going to be released in a few days,
will have 2.14 again.
Again?
Current Debian stable has 2.12.3. So we are making progress.
yes, you are right
however, having 2.16 would be a better progress
lilypond is not in the
Helge,
Sorry - yes. My email client appended the whole message.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 6:37:16 AM, you wrote:
I reply inline...
2013/4/23 Peter Toye lilyp...@ptoye.com
Thanks Urs and all others who
Vaughan McAlley writes:
(As an aside, I’ve lately been learning Tex by publishing my mother’s
autobiography. The book should look great. If I want to create a
version for e-readers, it looks like I have to get to ePub via HTML
format. It seems a shame, because the Tex source probably contains
Hi all,
just a quick (and urgent) question:
\shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0))
should be correct syntax? Or am I blind?
At least LilyPond 2.17.16 hits me
error: wrong type for argument 2. Expecting symbol list or music, found
((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
\shape Slur
Hi Urs,
the order of the arguments changed in 2.17:
\shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) Slur
should work. The second argument now also may be music, so that you can
use in a tweak fashion:
c-\shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) ( d)
HTH
best,
Jan-Peter
Am 24.04.2013 10:57, schrieb
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Hi all,
just a quick (and urgent) question:
\shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0))
should be correct syntax? Or am I blind?
At least LilyPond 2.17.16 hits me
error: wrong type for argument 2. Expecting symbol list or music, found
((0 . 0)
Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2013, 11:05 +0200 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hi Urs,
the order of the arguments changed in 2.17:
\shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) Slur
should work. The second argument now also may be music, so that you can
use in a tweak fashion:
c-\shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 .
Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2013, 11:05 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Hi all,
just a quick (and urgent) question:
\shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0))
should be correct syntax? Or am I blind?
At least LilyPond 2.17.16 hits me
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2013, 11:05 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Hi all,
just a quick (and urgent) question:
\shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0))
should be correct syntax? Or am I blind?
At
Hi Peter,
As a newbie I'm a bit surprised that Lilypond doesn't do that automatically.
1. It places the left edge of the music automatically. When you think about it,
this makes far more sense than having the left edge placed according to the
width of the instrument names (and thus
Carlo Stemberger schrieb:
Il 23/04/2013 17:49, Klaus Föhl ha scritto:
Hello,
Just snooping around and discovering that this markup:
score\relative c' { f d f a d f e d cis a cis e a g f e }/score
now [works on|has been enabled for] mediawiki i.e. en.wikipedia.org
Commands like
Hi List,
Does anyone know a modern notation to indicate a vibrato ?
Thanks,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 24 avr. 2013, at 16:31, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Does anyone know a modern notation to indicate a vibrato ?
Thanks,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Thanks Mike, looks interesting.
Do you think that this notation is often used by modern composers ?
Have you seen it elsewhere ?
2013/4/24 m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org
On 24 avr. 2013, at 16:31, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Does
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mike, looks interesting.
Do you think that this notation is often used by modern composers ?
Have you seen it elsewhere ?
Graphic notations of vibrato are fairly common. A
I find that the Hauptstimme and Nebenstimme signs as used by Schönberg can
be useful. They can save time in rehearsal letting players know who should be
on top.
Any chance of getting them put into Lilypond?
Regards,
Peter Toye
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Peter Toye lilyp...@ptoye.com wrote:
I find that the Hauptstimme and Nebenstimme signs as used by
Schönberg can be useful. They can save time in rehearsal letting players
know who should be on top.
Any chance of getting them put into Lilypond?
Another common option is simply indicating 'vib.', 'senza vib.', 'molto vib.'
etc.
On 09:07, Wed 24 Apr 2013, David Nalesnik wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:07:51 -0500
From: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Off-topics : vibrato
To: Pierre Perol-Schneider
David,
Thanks. I'd not discovered that yet. But I've only been using Lilypond for
about a week.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 3:26:21 PM, you wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Peter Toye
2013/4/24 Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de:
Carlo Stemberger schrieb:
Il 23/04/2013 17:49, Klaus Föhl ha scritto:
Hello,
Just snooping around and discovering that this markup:
score\relative c' { f d f a d f e d cis a cis e a g f e }/score
now [works on|has been enabled
On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
Another common option is simply indicating 'vib.', 'senza vib.', 'molto vib.'
Depends how precise a visual indicator you want to have of the type of vibrato,
particularly with respect to precise indication of the 'vertical' extent (i.e.
the range of
2013/4/24 Vaughan McAlley vaug...@mcalley.net.au:
(As an aside, I’ve lately been learning Tex by publishing my mother’s
autobiography. The book should look great. If I want to create a
version for e-readers, it looks like I have to get to ePub via HTML
format. It seems a shame, because the Tex
2013/4/24 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
It seems a shame, because the Tex source probably contains all
the information one would need to produce a nice e-book)
Maybe this http://www.latex2html.org/ can help, if you can customise
it for your needs.
Also google for latex to epub and
- Original Message -
From: Peter Toye
To: Wim van Dommelen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: Alignment problem with instrument name
Thanks. As a newbie I'm a bit surprised that Lilypond doesn't do that
automatically. But at least I've got a
Call me old-fashioned or antique, but despite their ubiquity, iPads and
Kindles are just too small to read music from at any proper distance.
There is a reason music scores are on large paper - readability. When
iPads get to 235 x 310 mm screens (Klavierformat piano score paper size)
then
Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com writes:
Call me old-fashioned or antique, but despite their ubiquity, iPads
and Kindles are just too small to read music from at any proper
distance. There is a reason music scores are on large paper -
readability. When iPads get to 235 x 310 mm screens
In landscape orientation, the width of the iPad screen is about 7.75 inches
(don't have one personally, but using the Pythagorean theorem on a 9.7
diagonal), which is about a quarter-inch wider than a line of a US-Letter
size printing with 1/2 inch margins (7.5 line length, about 190 mm). So
you
Again, maybe I am out of date but I need to see a full page of music,
and even a full two page spread to see what's coming up and what's gone
past when playing, not two or three systems, so that I have a wide
musical context. And US Letter is still narrow.
But then again, to show I am not
And, you can't easily markup the score with a pencil... I don't think
Avid Scorch supports annotations as yet, either.
This is relevant to lilypond discussions, as having lilypond target fine
printed output is going to be valid for a very long time to come, I reckon.
Andrew
On 24/04/13 3:11
On 24 avr. 2013, at 15:58, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mike, looks interesting.
Do you think that this notation is often used by modern composers ?
Have you seen it elsewhere ?
2013/4/24 m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org
On 24 avr.
Hi folks
I've just comme across this in 2.17.11
---
\version 2.17.11
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
{
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff \relative c'' { a1 }
\new Staff \relative c' { f1 }
\break
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff \relative c'' { b1 }
\new Staff
2013/4/24 Roman Stawski ro...@stawski.fr
Hi folks
I've just comme across this in 2.17.11
---
\version 2.17.11
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
{
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff \relative c'' { a1 }
\new Staff \relative c' { f1 }
\break
\new PianoStaff
On 24/04/2013 21:03, Federico Bruni wrote:
You can find an explanation here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/usage/common-errors#an-extra-staff-appears
Thanks Federico, I wasn't aware of this one. I appreciate the pointer.
the right input is:
\version 2.17.11
\paper {
I've just happened to update an old score from 2.13.x to latest version
2.17.7
The following custom tuning:
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #'(2 -3 -5 -8 -13 -20)
has been converted to:
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #`(,(ly:make-pitch 0 1 NATURAL)
,(ly:make-pitch -1 5 NATURAL) ,(ly:make-pitch
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Federico Bruni wrote:
The next Debian stable, which is going to be released in a few days,
will have 2.14 again. Hopefully 2.16 will be added to backports in
the next future. But it's in experimental since september:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lilypond.html
I
Hi everyone,
I've come to a problem I don't know how to fix involving the way that markups
are aligned to one another. I think there might be some scheme hacking involved
in getting the result I need, although potentially there might be an override
which I've overlooked that would do the same
Thanks much to all of you for your detailed replies.
Cheers,
Pierre
2013/4/24 m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org
On 24 avr. 2013, at 15:58, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mike, looks interesting.
Do you think that this notation is often used
Hi all,
trying to catch up on all the stuff written lately.
Obviously I somewhat lack the overview, so I try to do my best to do
everybody justice (knowing it won't work out ...)
###
Structure/Outline of the paper
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 10:09 -0400 schrieb Carl Peterson:
Because you have changed the number of lines in the staff the text won't
line up.
If you added something like
\once \override TextScript #'Y-offset = #-4.15
before the markup for 'five' this would align it to the baseline of the
surrounding text markup. Or you could put this sort of
42 matches
Mail list logo
