Am 09.09.2013 06:40, schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Am 2013-09-08 um 21:18 schrieb David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com:
Henning Hraban Ramm lilypon...@fiee.net writes:
I’m the one behind the previous lilypond module for ConTeXt and the current
LilyPond filter suggestion.
For me, it
On 8 September 2013 21:24, Joshua Nichols josh.d.nich...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks all! Got it on the etiquette. Got it on the brace...
Just in case someone else wants a stab, here's that compressed image you
were looking for.
Thomas Morley managed to override BarLine's stencil in order to
On 23 August 2013 18:16, SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
Trevor:
Thank you for the kind words. I'm currently editing the next playlist of
videos (15+ so far) and they'll feature a range of content including:
Lyrics
Relative Mode: In Detail
Introduction to the Score Block
The noteheads of whole notes are considerably wider than the noteheads
of smaller value notes, but a whole note harmonic has a notehead that is
exactly the same width as a harmonic notehead of any lesser value, and
considerably narrower than the head of a normal whole note. This makes a
whole
- Original Message -
From: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 1:12 PM
Subject: Notehead of harmonic whole note too narrow
The noteheads of whole notes are considerably wider than the noteheads
of smaller value notes, but a
thank you Nick for the report - I have added issue
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3543thanks=3543ts=1378731638
to the tracker
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Notehead-of-harmonic-whole-note-too-narrow-tp150520p150522.html
Sent
It strikes me more as an issue of horizontal alignment than notehead size.
For comparison, here's an example published by Boosey Hawkes (Britten violin
concerto): http://i.imgur.com/fiAgr6B.jpg
On 13:43, Mon 09 Sep 2013, Phil Holmes wrote:
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:43:45 +0100
From: Phil
- Original Message -
From: Owain Sutton ow...@owainsutton.co.uk
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Notehead of harmonic whole note too narrow
It strikes me more as
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Owain Sutton ow...@owainsutton.co.uk
It strikes me more as an issue of horizontal alignment than notehead size.
For comparison, here's an example published by Boosey Hawkes (Britten
On 09:42, Mon 09 Sep 2013, Carl Peterson wrote:
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:42:28 -0400
From: Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Notehead of harmonic whole note too narrow
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: ow...@owainsutton.co.uk, Mailinglist lilypond-user
Hi list,
Here's the snippet.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=83
Seems that convert-ly does not help to make it work.
Cheers,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Question for those who are familiar with linux bash shell scripting...
I have a script running on my linux box that uses inotifywait to monitor a
folder and compile any changed lilypond files. The folder is tied to my
dropbox account, so I can upload files to dropbox from any computer and
have
Janek Warchoł wrote
Ah, I see over on the dev forum that this is already in the works:
https://codereview.appspot.com/13578045/
Indeed. Suggestions on appropriate wording welcome!
Ok, I'll put it on my to-do list and see what I can do, but I don't think
I'll have time for it in the near
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
[...]
I tried updating my custom staff snippet on the LSR (to add the midi part),
but I am not able to edit the text of the snippet for some reason. When I
log in, locate the snippet, and click modify the
2013/9/9 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi list,
Here's the snippet.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=83
Seems that convert-ly does not help to make it work.
Cheers,
Pierre
Hi Pierre,
this snippet (and a plethora of others in LSR) uses
(equal?
I'm a novice Scheme programmer writing a music-function for manipulating
temporal proportion in music transcribed from white mensural notation.
Amongst other things, the function includes the original mensural
timesig in a \mark \markup, using the following code:
#(define mensurationSign
This looks a better match for the other whole notes:
\relative f'' {
\key e \minor
{
\tweak font-size #3
\tweak style #'harmonic-mixed
b1
[...]
For my taste, the harmonic note head is too big. I think the original
size is just fine if it gets centered on
On 09/09/13 22:43, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Payne
nick.pa...@internode.on.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 1:12 PM
Subject: Notehead of harmonic whole note too narrow
The noteheads of whole notes are considerably wider than the
3 comments (\version 2.16.0 or \version 2.17.19):
1) in this simple case it looks somehow better (at least it is centered):
{ c'''\harmonic g''1 }
2) I would prefer if it is stretched a bit horizontally and not just
magnified to match the wider shape of the whole note. A sketch is
attached -
2013/9/9 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
2013/9/9 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi list,
Here's the snippet.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=83
Seems that convert-ly does not help to make it work.
Cheers,
Pierre
Hi Pierre,
Will have a look
The difference concerning centering, is this: using
\override NoteHead #'style = #'harmonic-mixed
in your example, it gets left aligned, using
\harmonic
it gets centered.
I would not have expected this to make a difference.
\version 2.17.25
\relative f'' {
\key e \minor
\set
your example is not exactly comparable since
you get a chord full of harmonic-mixed or harmonic notes
with \override
but using \tweak for the single notes reveals a visible
difference:
Am 10.09.2013 00:39, schrieb Noeck:
Hi David,
David Nalesnik-2 wrote
I've never been able to edit my snippets after they have been approved.
What you can do is post a new snippet: copy the old one, change it, and
give it a title like Defining a Custom Staff Context [corrected]. The
person who reviews it will then replace the
ooops - sorry, I wasn't aware that in the original example the harmonic note
was in another voice context - my apologies
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Notehead-of-harmonic-whole-note-too-narrow-tp150520p150543.html
Sent from the User mailing list
2013/9/10 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
Hi David,
David Nalesnik-2 wrote
I've never been able to edit my snippets after they have been approved.
What you can do is post a new snippet: copy the old one, change it, and
give it a title like Defining a Custom Staff Context [corrected]. The
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
#(define (make-text-script x)
(make-music 'TextScriptEvent
'direction DOWN
'text x))
#(define (add-text-script m x)
(cond ((music-is-of-type? m 'event-chord)
(set! (ly:music-property m 'elements)
I think I've reduced the problem to a mere syntactical issue.
This compiles, but doesn't quite do what I need:
\version 2.16.2
% Adapted from snippet 725 Combining a time signature glyph and
a default time signature
music = \relative c' {
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
Is this really valid code?
Good question. I don't actually know... It does seem odd that a \layout
block can go inside a \midi block like that.
Cheers,
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
Graham King lilyp...@tremagi.org.uk writes:
But when I try to move all the complicated Scheme stuff into a function,
it gives an impenetrable thicket of errors:
\version 2.16.2
mensSign = #(define-scheme-function (parser location name)
(string?)
This is most helpful and a great start. Thanks!
IC,
Josh
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 September 2013 21:24, Joshua Nichols josh.d.nich...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks all! Got it on the etiquette. Got it on the brace...
Just in case
30 matches
Mail list logo
