On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 20:28 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hello all,
So interesting that this came up on the list this week… I was brainstorming
an orchestration teaching tool,
In case it is not widely appreciated ...
All sorts of tools and teaching aids become quite trivial if the music
Am 11.12.2013 19:47, schrieb Jan Rosseel:
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
I repeat my (corrected) suggestion which could be a workaround at
least.
If you can use Frescobaldi from Git you can pull and checkout the
accounting branch (not statistics) of my Frescobaldi fork on
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hello all,
So interesting that this came up on the list this week… I was
brainstorming an orchestration teaching tool, where one could find the
distribution of notes in an instrument across an entire score, to show
students where [good]
Actually I always thought WordStar was better than WordPerfect and still yearn
for Dos and Basic. Progress is a wonderful thing,
things just get more complex
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk writes:
Actually I always thought WordStar was better than WordPerfect and
still yearn for Dos and Basic.
Dos? How newfangled. I had to use the debugger to patch the terminal
control sequences for my (text) terminal emulator under CP/M into
WordStar.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:25 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Dos? How newfangled. I had to use the debugger to patch the terminal
control sequences for my (text) terminal emulator under CP/M into
WordStar. Yes, the manual contained the patch locations and
descriptions for the terminal
Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com writes:
Shane Brandes,
Please allow me to tap your expertise once again.
In most cases the command you gave worked. Two identical ( as far as I can
see ) codes are not producing identical engravings.
My error?
extra-offset tells
Mr. Kastrup,
Thank you for your input and providing another learning experience.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 6:57 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: 'Shane Brandes'; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Turns
Mark
David Kastrup wrote Thursday, December 12, 2013 2:57 PM
It does not really work well as a general mechanism. For rearranging
stacking orders and similar automatically, the manual offers a number of
recipes in
Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102
From: kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:28:03 -0500
To: j...@rosseel.com
CC: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hello all,
So interesting that this came up on the list this week… I was brainstorming
an orchestration
Suppose I have
music = \relative c'{c b a g f e e f g a b c}
my instrument is limited so it cannot play the pitch f end below
I have to raise f e e f by a terts of an octave
Is there a function shift or can it be made such that
music = \relative c'{c b a g \terts{f e e f} g a b
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Tom van der Hoeven
t...@vanderhoeven.bizwrote:
Suppose I have
music = \relative c'{c b a g f e e f g a b c}
my instrument is limited so it cannot play the pitch f end below
I have to raise f e e f by a terts of an octave
Is there a function shift or
Music21, does not really work to terribly well with Lilypond.
apparently there is a method of using Lilypond to generate output, but
it only reads musicxml and Lilypond currently cannot export to
musicxml. You can sidestep the issue partially and run midi files
through music21 but it reduces the
Hi,
I can include a file within an included file. But I would like
main.ly: \include folder/first.ly
first.ly: \inlcude second.ly
but second.ly is in the same folder as first.ly
Is there a way to do that? Or do I always have to specify the path
(relative to the lilypond include path)?
Thanks,
Am 12.12.2013 20:47, schrieb Noeck:
Hi,
I can include a file within an included file. But I would like
main.ly: \include folder/first.ly
first.ly: \inlcude second.ly
but second.ly is in the same folder as first.ly
Is there a way to do that? Or do I always have to specify the path
(relative to
Am 12.12.2013 23:37, schrieb Urs Liska:
This is described in
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files
ah, and
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files
___
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:24:51AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
I was
brainstorming an orchestration teaching tool, where one could find the
distribution of notes in an instrument across an entire score, to show
students where [good]
Thanks Urs,
I should have found this myself.
Just to confirm:
#(ly:set-option 'relative-includes #t)
does what I want, it is announced as default for 'future versions' but
it is not yet the default in 2.16 or 2.17.96
Cheers,
Joram
___
Tom van der Hoeven t...@vanderhoeven.biz writes:
Suppose I have
music = \relative c'{c b a g f e e f g a b c}
my instrument is limited so it cannot play the pitch f end below
I have to raise f e e f by a terts of an octave
Is there a function shift or can it be made such that
19 matches
Mail list logo
