Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme (was: accidentals for just intonation)

sorry. You have to switch to the just-intonation-stub branch, which is here: https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/just-intonation-stub/notation-snippets Cheers, A On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:13 AM, wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > >

Re: accidentals for just intonation

This is a whole other issue: that of placement. Yes, the way I use them is within the staff, and this raises issues when dealing with chord. For one, I align the accidentals vertically according to two rules: 1) the side with more factors is centered on the note, or (if they have the same number)

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme

On 13.12.2015 13:04, Graham Breed wrote: From: "N. Andrew Walsh" Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has alread been done, as there's a simple set of log and mround functions that do it. Have a look in the OLL repository under notation-tools and

Re: Extending staff lines through key change

Hi All, adding s8 or s16 do not work properly since it makes end staff longer. The solution I use nowadays is not elegant but works perfectly : \version "2.19.32" end-staff = \markup \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) \stencil #(make-path-stencil '(M 0-2 L

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme (was: accidentals for just intonation)

From: "N. Andrew Walsh" Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has alread been done, as there's a simple set of log and mround functions that do it. Have a look in the OLL repository under notation-tools and you should find the .ily files. What's the

Re: Extending staff lines through key change

2015-12-12 22:41 GMT+01:00 Cynthia Karl : > I’m engraving a piece that ends with a D.C. al Fine. Also the key at the > beginning of the piece is different from the key at the end of the piece. > So, in order to cue the performer, a final key change is issued for the > initial key:

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme (was: accidentals for just intonation)

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has alread been done, > as there's a simple set of log and mround functions that do it. Have a look > in the OLL repository under notation-tools and you should find the .ily At what URL? I'm

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme

Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry; mround is the equivalend function in the spreadsheet I use to do the same thing). Those functions will convert the input (given as a fraction comprising two integers) into Lily's semitone values. That should allow you to convert between just-intonation ratios

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme (was: accidentals for just intonation)

From: Urs Liska >Maybe so, but the result is less portable because (if I understand >correctly) you'd have to have a custom font and have it installed >correctly, etc. for anyone to be able to use the glyph... as opposed >to just having the custom glyphs in an include

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme (was: accidentals for just intonation)

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 15:55:08 +0100 "N. Andrew Walsh" wrote: > So I've kludged around with Inkscape, and I'm attaching a few .svg files > to show what I'm getting at. These are *very ugly*, and I would want to > spend a good bit of time working on proportion, weighting,

Re: Clef-BarLine crash with changed break-align-orders

2015-12-13 13:39 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > 2015-12-11 22:24 GMT+01:00 Robin Bannister : >> Noeck wrote: >> >>> This puts the clef after the bar line. However, there is not enough >>> space between the bar line and the clef. >> >> >> This looks like an

Re: Clef-BarLine crash with changed break-align-orders

2015-12-11 22:24 GMT+01:00 Robin Bannister : > Noeck wrote: > >> This puts the clef after the bar line. However, there is not enough >> space between the bar line and the clef. > > > This looks like an old weakness. > The BarLine rework left it much the same. Indeed. In the

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme (was: accidentals for just intonation)

See the previous message from me, which links to it and provides instructions for its use. Cheers, A On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Graham Breed wrote: > From: "N. Andrew Walsh" >> > > Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, Graham Breed wrote: > Converting from ratios to cents is easy. Converting between ratios and cents > requires a function from cents to ratios. That's a lot more difficult because > information is lost. You got us excited by suggesting that had been solved. Indeed. One can

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme (was: accidentals for just intonation)

So I've kludged around with Inkscape, and I'm attaching a few .svg files to show what I'm getting at. These are *very ugly*, and I would want to spend a good bit of time working on proportion, weighting, etc.. However, these are the components to build any accidental within a 7-limit system: a

Re: LyricText center-on-word breaks lyricMelismaAlignment

2015-12-03 17:32 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > below an improved and extended version of the snippet. > Should be possible to use override/set for self-alignment-X and > lyricMelimsaAlignment as you like now. > If no drawbacks happened, I'll put it in LSR soon, replacing

Re: converting svg glyph to path data for use in scheme

On 13/12/15 12:48, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry; mround is the equivalend function in the spreadsheet I use to do the same thing). Those functions will convert the input (given as a fraction comprising two integers) into Lily's semitone values. That should allow

lilypond linux does not like b flat !!!!

I'm pulling my hair over this strange thing that has affected stable releases of lilypond v2.14.2 from 2.18.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 with gedit and on LilyBin.com Lilypond does not like "bes" at all and it won't print b flat . Anyone had this problem ?. I don't have any other platform(OSX /

Re: lilypond linux does not like b flat !!!!

Eby Mani writes: > Lilypond does not like "bes" at all and it won't print b flat > . Anyone had this problem ?. I don't have any other platform(OSX / > Windows) to check. > > \version "2.16.2" > \language "english" In notename language "english" there is

Re: lilypond linux does not like b flat !!!!

Thanks David, after removing \language, everything working fine. Learned something new. I used template created by Frescobaldi, it would have inserted the \language part. On Sun, 13/12/15, David Kastrup wrote: In notename language

Re: lilypond linux does not like b flat !!!!

On 13.12.2015 19:11, Eby Mani wrote: Thanks David, after removing \language, everything working fine. Learned something new. I used template created by Frescobaldi, it would have inserted the \language part. Do you mean the Score Setup Wizard? It allows selecting pitch name language: in

Re: lilypond linux does not like b flat !!!!

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, Eby Mani wrote: Thanks David, after removing \language, everything working fine. Learned something new. The funny thing is that "Er is een kindeke" is a Dutch Christmas song, which make me assume you (like me) speak Dutch. LilyPond's default \language is also Dutch.

2.14.2-syntax for listed Staffs in SimultaneousMusic?

Hi all, currently I'm doing some research through the lily-versions. Therefore it would be great I could have a test-case working even for 2.14.2 The following works back to 2.16.2 How would be 2.14.2-syntax? Any hint, even for more clumsy coding, appreciated. I need that mapping over different

Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks

Hi, >> And you have nothing in your "macro" that would actually switch the >> "body" into markup mode. To me, that looks like being harder to explain >> to both compiler and user. > > Harder to the compiler? Yes, not hard to imagine. > To the user? I'm not sure. But that's only me. > > This is

Re: 2.14.2-syntax for listed Staffs in SimultaneousMusic?

Thomas Morley writes: > Hi all, > > currently I'm doing some research through the lily-versions. > Therefore it would be great I could have a test-case working even for 2.14.2 > > The following works back to 2.16.2 > How would be 2.14.2-syntax? > Any hint, even for more

Re: 2.14.2-syntax for listed Staffs in SimultaneousMusic?

2015-12-13 23:08 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> currently I'm doing some research through the lily-versions. >> Therefore it would be great I could have a test-case working even for 2.14.2 >> >> The following works back

Re: 2.14.2-syntax for listed Staffs in SimultaneousMusic?

2015-12-14 1:37 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > 2015-12-13 23:08 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> currently I'm doing some research through the lily-versions. >>> Therefore it would be great I