Re: Open Sound control?

2016-08-15 Thread David Wright
On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 18:10:03 (+0200), ander...@notam02.no wrote: > > "D" == David Wright writes: > > D> I've googled around for a file format, but all I find are > D> applications and program fragments. OK, an application might be > D> able to store

Re: Open Sound control?

2016-08-15 Thread andersvi
> "D" == David Wright writes: D> I've googled around for a file format, but all I find are D> applications and program fragments. OK, an application might be D> able to store an OSC protocol stream in a file, but that does not D> make that a file

Re: Abwesenheitsnotiz

2016-08-15 Thread Alexander Kobel
On 2016-08-15 18:57, Simon Albrecht wrote: In case any non-German speaking people might wonder: this is no spam [...] ... and the "Edition Lilienteich" in the mail address means "Edition Lilypond". And they have a logo... ;-) Cheers! On 15.08.2016 18:02, r...@lilienteich.de wrote: Sehr

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread Johan Vromans
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:33:44 -0500 David Wright wrote: > My contention there was that the volta construction can produce the > correct score and the correct midi when applied correctly (ie to all > the voices). How do you think I produced correct scores and MIDI for

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread David Kastrup
David Wright writes: > On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 17:20:09 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote: >> >> I change my remark to: "Specifying the structure of a score in >> \global is wonderful, it just doesn't play nice with MIDI, because no >> voice can impose a MIDI repeat

Re: Ties and retrograde

2016-08-15 Thread David Kastrup
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca writes: > The \retrograde function doesn't seem to handle ties at all, as seen in > this example, which engraves only one tie: > > music = { c'4~ c'8 g'8 } > > \new Staff { > \music > \retrograde \music > } > > The notation manual mentions that "manual" ties are not

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread David Wright
On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 17:20:09 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:39:39 -0500 > David Wright wrote: > > > I'm sorry, but your wishlist has nothing to do with the statement > > "Specifying the structure of a score in \global is wonderful, it just > >

Re: Abwesenheitsnotiz

2016-08-15 Thread Hugh S. Myers
I reply to all questions of 'sprechen sie' with a firm 'nein'!! On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 15.08.2016 um 18:57 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > > In case any non-German speaking people might wonder: this is no spam > > (for what I can tell), but

Re: Abwesenheitsnotiz

2016-08-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15.08.2016 um 18:57 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > In case any non-German speaking people might wonder: this is no spam > (for what I can tell), but an automatic reply informing us that Herr > Ried is on vacation and won’t answer. Ideally, Dennis, you might set > up the absence note so that it

Re: Abwesenheitsnotiz

2016-08-15 Thread Simon Albrecht
In case any non-German speaking people might wonder: this is no spam (for what I can tell), but an automatic reply informing us that Herr Ried is on vacation and won’t answer. Ideally, Dennis, you might set up the absence note so that it isn’t sent to mailing lists – I hope that’s possible.

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread David Kastrup
Johan Vromans writes: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:39:39 -0500 > David Wright wrote: > >> I'm sorry, but your wishlist has nothing to do with the statement >> "Specifying the structure of a score in \global is wonderful, it just >> doesn't work with

Abwesenheitsnotiz

2016-08-15 Thread ried
Sehr geehrte Dame, sehr geehrter Herr, ich bin bis zum 23.08.2016 im Urlaub und kann Ihre Anfrage leider nicht beantworten. Gerne kümmere ich mich nach meiner Rückkehr um Ihre Wünsche. Ihre eMail wird nicht weitergeleitet. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Kollegen

Re: Open Sound control?

2016-08-15 Thread David Wright
On Sun 14 Aug 2016 at 13:02:08 (+0200), ander...@notam02.no wrote: > b> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Sound_Control is sayed to > b> replace MIDI. Is this something usefull for lilypond? > > It should be. Storing and sending/receiving arbitrary data is > straightforward in OSC, in

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread Johan Vromans
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:39:39 -0500 David Wright wrote: > I'm sorry, but your wishlist has nothing to do with the statement > "Specifying the structure of a score in \global is wonderful, it just > doesn't work with midi." There is something called the principle of

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread David Wright
On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 09:18:57 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:45:51 -0500 > David Wright wrote: > > > This is true, they are not. In fact, I don't quite understand what > > you mean by "applying" \global "to the music parts". All the Voices > >

Re: Open Sound control?

2016-08-15 Thread andersvi
b> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Sound_Control is sayed to b> replace MIDI. Is this something usefull for lilypond? It should be. Storing and sending/receiving arbitrary data is straightforward in OSC, in MIDI you'll have to build and parse sysex for any non-standard (e.g. rhythms,

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread David Kastrup
Mark Knoop writes: > At 10:32 on 15 Aug 2016, Johan Vromans wrote: >>On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200 >>David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by >>> changing the bar line type, ... >> >>That is the explanation

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread David Kastrup
Johan Vromans writes: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200 > David Kastrup wrote: > >> That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by changing >> the bar line type, ... > > That is the explanation of the current behaviour. > > What I want to

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread Mark Knoop
At 10:32 on 15 Aug 2016, Johan Vromans wrote: >On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200 >David Kastrup wrote: > >> That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by >> changing the bar line type, ... > >That is the explanation of the current behaviour. > >What I want to say

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread Johan Vromans
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200 David Kastrup wrote: > That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by changing > the bar line type, ... That is the explanation of the current behaviour. What I want to say is that it would be nice if instead it would be like the

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread David Kastrup
Johan Vromans writes: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:45:51 -0500 > David Wright wrote: > >> This is true, they are not. In fact, I don't quite understand what >> you mean by "applying" \global "to the music parts". All the Voices >> are just Voices,

Re: rehearsal marks: separate from content encoding and display above strings

2016-08-15 Thread Johan Vromans
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:45:51 -0500 David Wright wrote: > This is true, they are not. In fact, I don't quite understand what > you mean by "applying" \global "to the music parts". All the Voices > are just Voices, aren't they? > > Anyway, the repeat structure has to be