Re: forced break was overridden by some other event

Il giorno lun 24 ott 2016 alle 20:29, Noeck ha scritto: Thank you: it works, but a small glissando line appears on TabStaff only in the second bar of the example (see attached image). Probably a bug of \hideNotes.. That's what I thought, the last time I reported

RE: Tie settings question

Greetings All, For other learners reading this thread in the future, I just thought I would mention that since the details property of Tie is an association list (alist), you can specify the values in Scheme in a way that I personally find more readable and less noisy. Here's the syntax, just

Re: convert-ly usage question

On Mon 24 Oct 2016 at 23:39:14 (+0200), Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 24.10.2016 23:31, Karol Majewski wrote: > >Hi Simon, > > > >does convert-ly work for you when you try to update any single file? > > Surprisingly for me, yes it does. In which case, for bash: for j in *.ly ; do convert-ly -e

Re: convert-ly usage question

In addition to that, try running: % /home/simon/lilypond/2.19.47/bin/convert-ly -e *.ly If that's working, you might want to read up on aliases in the bash man page, and then use a shell function instead. On 24/10/2016 23:31, Karol Majewski wrote: > Hi Simon, > > does convert-ly work for you

Re: convert-ly usage question

On 24.10.2016 23:31, Karol Majewski wrote: Hi Simon, does convert-ly work for you when you try to update any single file? Surprisingly for me, yes it does. Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: convert-ly usage question

Hi Simon, does convert-ly work for you when you try to update any single file? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

convert-ly usage question

Hello, this is actually the first time I try to use convert-ly from the command-line to update a bunch of files, yet I’m not quite getting there. I have this in my ~/.bashrc file: # use current convert-ly alias convert-ly='/home/simon/lilypond/2.19.47/bin/convert-ly' and this is what I get: $

Re: Tie settings question

This is fine now. Thx, David. I work really hard to make LilyPond ties look the way I want. My current settings are the following: \override Tie.details.height-limit = #1.25 \override Tie.details.ratio = #0.25 \override Tie.details.between-length-limit = #1 \override

Re: forced break was overridden by some other event

Hi Federico, > Thank you: it works, but a small glissando line appears on TabStaff only > in the second bar of the example (see attached image). Probably a bug of > \hideNotes.. That's what I thought, the last time I reported this. But apparently it is not a but but a feature: The note

Google Code-In

Anyone here saying that applying for this https://developers.google.com/open-source/gci/ would make sense for LilyPond? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Hairpin and simultaneous expressions

Thanks, both, for the helpful answers to this problem. David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Hairpin and simultaneous expressions

> \version "2.19.46" > > \language "english" > > %%Vn2 bars 276-279 > \relative e' { >   \time 3/2 1.\p\< ~ | q ~ | q | | > %%Vn2 bars 280-283 >   << { \stemUp d2(\mp bf1 ~ | bf1. ~ | bf ~ | bf1)} \\ {f1. ~ | f ~ | f > ~ | f1 } >> r2 | > } > > The above extract from one of my files

Re: Hairpin and simultaneous expressions

David, On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:10 AM, David Sumbler [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n195665...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > \version "2.19.46" > > \language "english" > > %%Vn2 bars 276-279 > \relative e' { > \time 3/2 1.\p\< ~ | q ~ | q | | > %%Vn2 bars 280-283 > << { \stemUp d2(\mp

Hairpin and simultaneous expressions

\version "2.19.46" \language "english" %%Vn2 bars 276-279 \relative e' {   \time 3/2 1.\p\< ~ | q ~ | q | | %%Vn2 bars 280-283   << { \stemUp d2(\mp bf1 ~ | bf1. ~ | bf ~ | bf1)} \\ {f1. ~ | f ~ | f ~ | f1 } >> r2 | } The above extract from one of my files compiles to give the result I

Re: forced break was overridden by some other event

Hi Pierre Thank you: it works, but a small glissando line appears on TabStaff only in the second bar of the example (see attached image). Probably a bug of \hideNotes.. Maybe if I could set the length of glissando (to be smaller)... Anyway, I've just remembered that in this case I use

Re: forced break was overridden by some other event

Hi Federico, How about: \version "2.19" upper = \relative { e'8 cis( b) gis~ gis r b4 % maybe it's the grace synchronization bug? \break | \hideNotes \grace b8 r1 } lower = \relative { e,2 e'8 r \once\override Glissando.breakable = ##t \once\override Glissando.after-line-breaking

forced break was overridden by some other event

Hi folks What's wrong with this input? I cannot force line break and I get the warning "forced break was overridden by some other event": \version "2.19.48" upper = \relative { e'8 cis( b) gis~ gis r b4 % maybe it's the grace synchronization bug? \hideNotes \grace b8 \break | r1 }