Hi,
is it really true we have no viable method to use pitched rests in TabStaff?
Or am I overlooking something?
Some code to play with:
\version "2.19.49"
ps = { e,4 f, g, a, b, c d e f g a b c' d' e' f' g' a' b' c'' }
<<
\new TabStaff \ps
\new TabStaff \with { \revert Rest.stencil }
\
>>What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than
>>stacked notes? E.g. << 4. // 2. >> (untested).
>>
>>I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to
>>understand which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an
>>outstanding bug about horizontal positioning in this si
The test case isn't ideal (maybe is better than , but I think
the dotted minim a needs an individual dot...
On 29 Oct 2016 20:21, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>
> On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" wrote:
> >
> >What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than stacked
> >notes? E.g. <<
On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" wrote:
>
>What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than stacked
>notes? E.g. << 4. // 2. >> (untested).
>
>I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to understand
>which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an outstanding bug a
On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" wrote:
>On 29 Oct 2016 04:39, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>>
>> I have worked some more on the augmentation dot algorithms, including
>>adding the directions (/DotsUp, /DotsDown).
>>
>> I would like your opinion on whether the attached regression test,
>>which is d
Hi Bernhard,
This sort of publisher code may be common in Germany but I have never seen it
here in Australia, at least, or in scores from Europe in general. Publishers
put all sorts of codes and private numbers on sheafs of pages for printing to
help with binding and so on, although this seems
Searching together with "Plattennummer" gives a number of results :
https://www.google.com/search?q=plattennummer+B.N.B.+140&rlz=1Y3GQQX_deDE588DE589&oq=plattennummer+B.N.B.+140&aqs=chrome..69i57.11506j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Using 'Verlagsnummer" a few others;
https://www.google.com/
Dear all,
on commercial music sheets there is a code at the bottom of the pages
indicating the publishers and the edition of that piece/book. I have
this code and want to look up the publisher and the information whether
that piece of music is not available. With google I was not successfull
when
> I would like your opinion on whether the attached regression test,
> which is different from the current development regression tests, is
> correct. I think it is, but I'd like your opinions.
Thanks, it looks fine. However, I second Chris's concerns regarding
more complicated cases where you
On 29 Oct 2016 04:39, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
> I have worked some more on the augmentation dot algorithms, including
adding the directions (/DotsUp, /DotsDown).
>
> I would like your opinion on whether the attached regression test, which
is different from the current development regression tests
10 matches
Mail list logo
