Re: Clef modifier vertical position

2017-01-10 Thread Noeck
Hi Andrew, Am 11.01.2017 um 04:29 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > I never knew you apply layout modifications to things like \clef "F_8". I was also excited. But in my test, it does not: \version "2.19.50" \layout { \context { \Staff \clef "F_8" \override ClefModifier.staff-padding =

Re: Clef modifier vertical position

2017-01-10 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Pierre, This is so completely brilliant. Thanks! In particular it addresses the issue I have where I simultaneously have a clef "treble^8" in the other staff, and this does not alter the position of the modifier for that clef, which I was having problems with until enlightened by you. I

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-10 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Nick, As a seriously serious functional programmer who uses Haskell myself, I am not laughing! :-) It's entirely infeasible to redo lilypond in Haskell. But I would add that if I were starting from scratch as the founding fathers of lilypond did twenty years ago, today I would choose Haskell.

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-10 Thread SoundsFromSound
Klaus Blum wrote > Hi again, > > recently I've done some homework... ;-) > I've tried to make some additions, and the result is > OOoLilyPond-0.4.2rc1.oxt - see attached. > > New features: > > 1.) It's now possible to add include paths in the config dialog. > > 2.) Ability to save the

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-10 Thread Klaus Blum
Hi again, recently I've done some homework... ;-) I've tried to make some additions, and the result is OOoLilyPond-0.4.2rc1.oxt - see attached. OOoLilyPond-0.oxt Notice: This is based on the most "recent" release

Re: Changing orientation of noteheads in tuplets

2017-01-10 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-01-10 13:40 GMT+01:00 : > Hello everybody, > > I'm having a problem with beams when using > > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861 > > to change the direction of noteheads of chords that are part of a tuplet. > The beams just disappear, and If the tuplet is more

Re: Cannot use \layout in a variable

2017-01-10 Thread Urs Liska
Am 10. Januar 2017 18:55:04 MEZ schrieb Timothy Lanfear : >On 10/01/17 16:59, Peter Toye wrote: >> Cannot use \layout in a variable I wanted to use the same layout in a > >> number of places, so put it into a variable. And got an error. >> >> \version "2.19.52" >> >>

Re: Cannot use \layout in a variable

2017-01-10 Thread Timothy Lanfear
On 10/01/17 16:59, Peter Toye wrote: Cannot use \layout in a variable I wanted to use the same layout in a number of places, so put it into a variable. And got an error. \version "2.19.52" \language "english" Lay = { \layout { } } \new Score { \new Staff { \relative { c'4 c c c }

Re: Cannot use \layout in a variable

2017-01-10 Thread SoundsFromSound
ptoye wrote > I wanted to use the same layout in a number of places, so put it into a > variable. And got an error. > > \version "2.19.52" > > \language "english" > > Lay = { > \layout { > } > } > > \new Score { > \new Staff { > \relative > { c'4 c c c } > } > } > > > gives

Cannot use \layout in a variable

2017-01-10 Thread Peter Toye
I wanted to use the same layout in a number of places, so put it into a variable. And got an error. \version "2.19.52" \language "english" Lay = { \layout { } } \new Score { \new Staff { \relative { c'4 c c c } } } gives Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.52 [Layout.ly]...

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-10 Thread Nicholas Bailey
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 10:20:17 GMT Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Unfortunately I ran into this very issue, changing from Debian > > stable (in the Linux Mint Debian Edition incarnation) to vanilla > > Debian testing. I did this because the PyQt5 packages in stable are > > too old to run current

Changing orientation of noteheads in tuplets

2017-01-10 Thread clavis
Hello everybody, I'm having a problem with beams when using http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861 to change the direction of noteheads of chords that are part of a tuplet. The beams just disappear, and If the tuplet is more complex, like 14/8, it gets really bad. Would anybody have an