On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:31:39PM -0500, John Roper wrote:
>Ok, so what are the major things you would like from a new web redesign
>(not including the docs)?
>I know of:
>Not reliant on JavaScript
>Can be translated
>Can be updated with each new build
There's a few
> Ok, so what are the major things you would like from a new web
> redesign (not including the docs)?
>
> I know of:
>
> Not reliant on JavaScript
> Can be translated
> Can be updated with each new build
If possible, try an incremental approach! I'm quite sure that you can
achieve almost
On 02/02/2017 09:31 PM, John Roper wrote:
Ok, so what are the major things you would like from a new web
redesign (not including the docs)?
Hi, I'll defer to Graham and others on this (cc'd). Probably best to
start a new thread for this question on the developer's list:
Ok, so what are the major things you would like from a new web redesign
(not including the docs)?
I know of:
Not reliant on JavaScript
Can be translated
Can be updated with each new build
--
John Roper
Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist
Boston, MA USA
http://jmroper.com/
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 22:41, Flaming Hakama by Elaine
> wrote:
>
> I'd say, in general, you need as many alternatives as there is unique
> material.
>
> Only 1 & 3 are the same, so you can combine those.
> 2 and 4 differ in that 2 needs a repeat barline at the end
> When the whole section is repeated when it has alternatives, how is that
> normally engraved? Specifically, the section has two alternatives, but is
> repeated in full. One way is to use Score.repeatCommands for alternatives
> markup "1. 3" resp "2. 4", but then the "2." does not have a repeat.
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 20:56, David Wright wrote:
>> Yes, the idea was to just add "2x" to a repeat with two alternatives. How
>> would that look, in your view?
>
> Isn't there a danger that the "2x" will be seem as merely a redundant
> reinforcement of an ordinary
On Thu 02 Feb 2017 at 20:29:49 (+0100), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 2 Feb 2017, at 19:35, Chris Yate wrote:
>
> >> > I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for each
> >> > alternative, and expect a repeat symbol at the end of any section that
> >> >
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 19:35, Chris Yate wrote:
>> > I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for each
>> > alternative, and expect a repeat symbol at the end of any section that
>> > needed it.
>> >
>> > Of course you might put labelling like "1, 3", "2",
On 2 Feb 2017 5:00 p.m., "Hans Åberg" wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:52, Chris Yate wrote:
> > Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best
engraving practice?
>
> The latter.
>
> I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal
OK, thanks. Can you think of any way of automatically setting the measures
based on the lyrics? How difficult would this be?
Thanks again,
*Benjamin Bloomfield*
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> On 02.02.2017 18:59, Benjamin Bloomfield wrote:
>
On 02.02.2017 18:59, Benjamin Bloomfield wrote:
Is there any way to set automatic accidentals to be remembered until
the end of the current word (in the same way that the default is to
remember them until the end of the current measure)? This is the
custom in Gregorian chant written on a four
Is there any way to set automatic accidentals to be remembered until the
end of the current word (in the same way that the default is to remember
them until the end of the current measure)? This is the custom in
Gregorian chant written on a four line staff, and I'd like to be able to do
it this
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:52, Chris Yate wrote:
> > Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving
> > practice?
>
> The latter.
>
> I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for each
> alternative, and expect a repeat symbol at
On 2 Feb 2017 16:49, "Hans Åberg" wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:09, Chris Yate wrote:
>
> Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best
engraving practice?
The latter.
I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:09, Chris Yate wrote:
>
> Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving
> practice?
The latter.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving
practice?
On 2 Feb 2017 15:18, "Hans Åberg" wrote:
> When the whole section is repeated when it has alternatives, how is that
> normally engraved? Specifically, the section has two alternatives, but
When the whole section is repeated when it has alternatives, how is that
normally engraved? Specifically, the section has two alternatives, but is
repeated in full. One way is to use Score.repeatCommands for alternatives
markup "1. 3" resp "2. 4", but then the "2." does not have a repeat. One
2017-02-02 9:51 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Fuß :
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to typeset a single quarter note with stem and crossed note head
> inside a \markup. So far I've only managed note heads with \musicglyph:
>
> \markup \musicglyph #"noteheads.s2cross"
>
> How can I add the
Hi folks,
I'm trying to typeset a single quarter note with stem and crossed note head
inside a \markup. So far I've only managed note heads with \musicglyph:
\markup \musicglyph #"noteheads.s2cross"
How can I add the stem?
cheers
Hendrik
___
20 matches
Mail list logo