Hello folks,
In appendix A.17 of the LPNR v2.19.57, what doest the « No setting… » sentence
mean?
alternativeNumberingStyle (symbol)
The style of an alternative’s bar numbers. Can be numbers for going
back to the same number or numbers-with-letters for going back to the same
number wit
2017-03-28 18:16 GMT+03:00 David Wright :
> because it doesn't handle whole-measure rests...or does it now?
No, it doesn't, indeed.
> I have come across this reference, which claims to handle them,
> but I have yet to try it out:
>
> https://github.com/wbsoft/lilymusic/blob/master/include/merge-re
2017-03-28 18:16 GMT+03:00 David Wright :
>> Having abovementioned LSR snippet: here in Ukraine quarter rests in
>> the first measure should be merged, but in the second one upper voice
>> hsould be notated as r4 r e g and two quarter rests should not be
>> merged.
>
> Am I looking at the same imag
Hi, Vaughan!
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Vaughan McAlley [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n201694...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I’m happy to announce LilyQuick 0.92beta. The main feature is
> (hopefully) simpler installation with (hopefully) clearer
> documentation. As well, Lily
Greetings,
I’m happy to announce LilyQuick 0.92beta. The main feature is
(hopefully) simpler installation with (hopefully) clearer
documentation. As well, LilyQuick can now automatically quit Qsynth
when it quits. Enjoy!
https://github.com/palestrina/lily-q
Vaughan
Here is the README file:
LILY
Point taken. I actually had read it a while back, which is how I came to
know about bar checks, but missed that part. I'll reread it...
On Mar 27, 2017 3:28 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
> Others have pointed out the problem to you, but you would have found it
> yourself by reading the Learning Manu
Instead that has worked. Thanks (my fault).
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/RemoveEmptyStaves-don-t-work-as-I-would-to-tp201683p201691.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-use
Hi,
> Thanks for the lesson (maybe I'll be able to understand it), but still it
> doesn't work…
Below is your original snippet, with the suggested fix.
It doesn’t work for you as you expect? (It certainly does for me.)
Kieren.
\version "2.19.26"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
skipBars = ##
Thanks for the lesson (maybe I'll be able to understand it), but still it
doesn't work...
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/RemoveEmptyStaves-don-t-work-as-I-would-to-tp201683p201689.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
I've installed the latest version, but no changes :-(
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/RemoveEmptyStaves-don-t-work-as-I-would-to-tp201683p201687.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
li
Hi Son,
about minimal examples, see my comments below. ;)
2017-03-28 21:48 GMT+02:00 Son_V :
> neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves ..
>
> This is my try for a Minimum example, sorry if I failed to make it smaller:
>
> \version "2.19.26"
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Score
no need for skipBars
>
Son_V writes:
> neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves ..
>
> This is my try for a Minimum example, sorry if I failed to make it smaller:
>
> \version "2.19.26"
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Score
> skipBars = ##t
> %\RemoveEmptyStaves
> }
> }
\RemoveEmptyStaves and \RemoveAllEmptyStaves a
Hi,
> neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves ..
In 2.19.56, that (with a single \ of course) works as expected for me.
Maybe upgrade?
Hope this helps,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves ..
This is my try for a Minimum example, sorry if I failed to make it smaller:
\version "2.19.26"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
skipBars = ##t
%\RemoveEmptyStaves
}
}
PartPOneVoiceOne = \relative g' {
\clef "treble" \key c \major \numericTimeSignatu
2017-03-28 0:39 GMT+02:00 Dmitry :
> Hi,
>
> There's been a long standing feature request:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3909/
>
> #3909 a feature to disable the chord root name printing - just print
> the slash and inversion
>
> Over the years, it has been addressed more or l
Am 28.03.2017 um 11:09 schrieb Menu Jacques:
- should there be only one set of quarter rests under (CT.) in the
lower staff, and if so, how can that be done (i.e. to « mask » a rest
in a voice if there’s already one at the same point in another voice
in the same staff)? Finale does so;
- woul
On Tue 28 Mar 2017 at 12:16:41 (+0300), Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> Regarding the first question: Lilypond can merge rests "automagically"
> --- http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336 --- but it may depend on
> local rules.
I've used this snippet for a while now, together with
mmrest = { \once \ove
Hello Dmytro,
Thanks, that will help me a lot too!
JM
> Le 28 mars 2017 à 16:03, Dmytro O. Redchuk a écrit :
>
> 2017-03-28 16:50 GMT+03:00 Guy Stalnaker :
>> Oh, my! This is brilliant! I write mostly choral music and this will be
>> invaluable! Much thanks.
> Well, when you need two rests to
2017-03-28 16:50 GMT+03:00 Guy Stalnaker :
> Oh, my! This is brilliant! I write mostly choral music and this will be
> invaluable! Much thanks.
Well, when you need two rests to remain separated, you can put in
either voice before that rest:
\once \override Staff.RestCollision.positioning-done = ##
Oh, my! This is brilliant! I write mostly choral music and this will be
invaluable! Much thanks.
Guy
Guy Stalnaker
jimmyg...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
wrote:
> Regarding the first question: Lilypond can merge rests "automagically"
> --- http://lsr.di.unimi.it
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 28.03.2017 um 14:56 schrieb David Kastrup:
>
>> You may try looking at the grob-property-data of 'direction which
>> will be a direction when there is a direction override in progress
>> (pointing to a multi-voice situation) and usually some sort of
>> callback for the deci
Am 28.03.2017 um 14:56 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> (how) is it possible to determine (from within a stencil override
>> callback) if at any given point there is more than one active voice?
>> I've asked a similar question before but probably from the wrong
>> pe
Urs Liska writes:
> Hi all,
>
> (how) is it possible to determine (from within a stencil override
> callback) if at any given point there is more than one active voice?
> I've asked a similar question before but probably from the wrong
> perspective.
>
> I'm overriding a stencil have to make a de
Hi all,
(how) is it possible to determine (from within a stencil override
callback) if at any given point there is more than one active voice?
I've asked a similar question before but probably from the wrong
perspective.
I'm overriding a stencil have to make a decision depending on the
situation
Regarding the first question: Lilypond can merge rests "automagically"
--- http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336 --- but it may depend on
local rules.
Having abovementioned LSR snippet: here in Ukraine quarter rests in
the first measure should be merged, but in the second one upper voice
hsould b
Hello folks,
Two questions about the display style for Recordare's Binchois20.xml file:
- should there be only one set of quarter rests under (CT.) in the
lower staff, and if so, how can that be done (i.e. to « mask » a rest in a
voice if there’s already one at the same point in another
Hi all,
I don't find a way to determine if a given note head has a script
attached to it. Neither the grob-object nor the parent note column seem
to have this information. Is it necessary to go back to the music that
caused the notehead to get to attached scripts?
Thanks
Urs
--
u...@openlilylib
27 matches
Mail list logo