Re: lilypond errors on a guitar minor sixth chord

Thomas, Got it. I used your first solution with the addendum. If at some point in the future I need more chords, I will construct a more extensive file for guitar chords. I did construct a fingering file for plectrum banjo a while back. It's got 25 chords for each of 12 keys, but I don't have

Re: "Winged" repeat after double bar and line break

2017-04-15 0:05 GMT+02:00 Daniel Rosen : > \version "2.19.56" > > > > \relative c'' { > > c4 c c c > > \bar "[|:" > > c4 c c c \break > > \bar ".|:-||" > > c4 c c c > > } > > > > > > > > I would like the first line in the above example to end with a

"Winged" repeat after double bar and line break

\version "2.19.56" \relative c'' { c4 c c c \bar "[|:" c4 c c c \break \bar ".|:-||" c4 c c c } I would like the first line in the above example to end with a double bar (\bar "||"), and the second line to begin with a winged begin-repeat bar (\bar "[|:"). How can I

Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

Hi David, > That thread is now 8 months old, and I wondered what has happened since. Unfortunately, not as much as one would hope… > Is some of it yet incorporated into the development version of LilyPond? I’d have to look more closely, but my intuition is “yes”. > Is it likely to be included

Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 14:37 +0100, David Sumbler wrote: > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > > > > At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of > > > problem, other than having completely separate input for the > > >

Re: Staff grouping

On 4/14/17 5:55 AM, "Jérôme Plût" wrote: >Are there any other ways to tune the vertical spacing between staffs >other than the \paper block? What I want is the following: on the same >page, > - first a score A (single-staff, no groups) with successive staffs >

Re: "natural width" of a measure

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 13.04.2017 um 16:48 schrieb David Nalesnik: >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Urs Liska wrote: >>> >>> Am 11.04.2017 um 21:04 schrieb tisimst: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:00 PM,

Re: Staff grouping

- Original Message - From: "Jérôme Plût" To: Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 12:55 PM Subject: Staff grouping Are there any other ways to tune the vertical spacing between staffs other than the \paper block? What I want is the following: on

Staff grouping

Are there any other ways to tune the vertical spacing between staffs other than the \paper block? What I want is the following: on the same page, - first a score A (single-staff, no groups) with successive staffs extremely close together (about 2 or 3 staff lines of separation should be

Re: lilypond errors on a guitar minor sixth chord

2017-04-14 12:25 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : > Sollution(s): > > (1) > Define it yourself, search the NR for 'storePredefinedDiagram'. Leading to: > > \version "2.19.56" > > \language "english" > > \storePredefinedDiagram #default-fret-table \chordmode {e-flat:m6} >

Re: lilypond errors on a guitar minor sixth chord

2017-04-14 5:18 GMT+02:00 Stan Mulder : > > Thomas, > > Here's your example, but with fretboards added. The error is there. > Apparently it has to do with fretboards. Also, I am running 2.19.59: > > \version "2.19.56" > \language "english" > \include

Re: Tuplet bracket

Thanks so much to both! I ended up using X-offset, and it works like a charm. You're absolutely correct, Andrew. The score isn't particularly nice right now. The break is actually my bad, I'm pretty sure I failed to copy over something from my include files - since the bin had to be a

Re: Tuplet bracket

Hi Malte, Sure, depends which side you want to adjust of course, I am merely indicating a possible technique. Michiel, speaking as a player myself, your example score seems fairly cramped and lacking what I call 'air', making it a bit hard to read. And there is definitely something wrong with

Re: Tuplet bracket

Am 14.04.2017 um 06:45 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > Hi Michiel, > > Use shorten-pait to taste. > > %\once \override TupletBracket.positions = #'(3.1 . 3.4) > \once \override TupletBracket.shorten-pair = #'(0 . 0.5) Shouldn’t this be #'(0.2 . 0) or similar but not #'(0 . 0.5)

Re: "natural width" of a measure

Am 13.04.2017 um 16:48 schrieb David Nalesnik: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> Am 11.04.2017 um 21:04 schrieb tisimst: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Urs Liska [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 11.04.2017 um

Re: Fonts in the title (that is, to have better apostrophes and commas)

On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:44:20 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Alt + Yikes... 1981 calling. I thought most systems nowadays support a compose key? Unix/Linux systems have done so since 1983. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compose_key > It’s great that you’re interested