widening feathered beams

I would like to increase the vertical space between feathered beams. This achieves approximately what I want for left-feathered beaming: % decelerating \override Stem.beaming = #(cons (list ) (list 0 3)) \once \override Beam.grow-direction = #LEFT c16 \override Stem.beaming = #(cons

Re: Staccato Dot Size

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:24 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> >> Am 5. Mai 2017 20:52:35 MESZ schrieb Karlin High : >>>On 5/5/2017 1:16 PM, Benjamin Strecker wrote: How would

Re: Score anecdote

Menu Jacques writes: > Hello folks, > > Some days ago, Jean-Pierre the clarinetist says: « Let’s work the > Poulenc sonata for clarinet and bassoon. Oh, that’s strange, I’ve got > two scores for you… Take that one, it’s more readable! ». > > That score I did myself two years

Score anecdote

Hello folks, Some days ago, Jean-Pierre the clarinetist says: « Let’s work the Poulenc sonata for clarinet and bassoon. Oh, that’s strange, I’ve got two scores for you… Take that one, it’s more readable! ». That score I did myself two years ago with LP, precisely to have it more readable, as

Re: Doing some strange stuff with multi-measure rests

Yeah, that seems to work, thanks! I'd prefer if it didn't reduce the left margin, but there's no point in being picky. I guess it can be fixed by tweaking the X-offset and the scaling factor. I'm considering experimenting with modifying the stencil expression itself, though. Getting the

Re: Staccato Dot Size

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 5. Mai 2017 20:52:35 MESZ schrieb Karlin High : >>On 5/5/2017 1:16 PM, Benjamin Strecker wrote: >>> How would I go about globally reducing the size of the staccato dot? >> >>The solution is

Re: Staccato Dot Size

Am 5. Mai 2017 20:52:35 MESZ schrieb Karlin High : >On 5/5/2017 1:16 PM, Benjamin Strecker wrote: >> How would I go about globally reducing the size of the staccato dot? > >The solution is probably going to involve a \context { } block. Maybe >something like this: > >% BEGIN

Re: Staccato Dot Size

On 5/5/2017 1:16 PM, Benjamin Strecker wrote: > How would I go about globally reducing the size of the staccato dot? The solution is probably going to involve a \context { } block. Maybe something like this: % BEGIN LILYPOND CODE \version "2.19.59" \score { c'4 -. \layout {

Staccato Dot Size

How would I go about globally reducing the size of the staccato dot? Locally, I can do it with: c'4-\tweak Script.font-size #-2 -. but I'm having a difficult time figuring out how to do this for every staccato dot without changing the size of other articulations. Thanks! Ben

Percent-sign repeats for non-whole-measure patterns

Is it possible to force Lilypond to use % as a repeat sign if the repeated section does not fill a whole measure? \relative c' { \repeat percent 2 { c4 d } \repeat percent 2 { c4 d e f } } Here, the first repeat is a slash /, the second a percent sign %. I'd like to have a % sign in both

Re: OT: Apple stealing "Lily"

>> Anybody remembering apple sueing apple records for trademark infringement? > > Aaand we're back with some good old conspiracy theories and household paranoia. Relax. > I distinctly remember Apple Corps (i.e. The Beatles) suing Apple Inc (i.e. > Apple) for copyright infringement. It was the

Chromatic clash in two voices

In a situation like \version "2.19.44" \new Staff << \new Voice { \voiceOne b'!1 } \new Voice { \voiceTwo bes'!2 } >> Lilypond puts the two accidentals first, then the to note heads side by side ("flat-natural-notehead-notehead"). Is there a way to obtain the ordering

Re: How to move a note just a little

On 5-5-2017 15:39, Karlin High wrote: On 5/5/2017 8:31 AM, Partitura Organum wrote: I use an app called "Linux Deploy This thing? https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ru.meefik.linuxdeploy -- Karlin High Missouri, USA Yes, that's the one.

Re: Weird lyric extender shortening

"N. Andrew Walsh" writes: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 5:15 PM, N. Andrew Walsh > wrote: > >> >> Anyway, is this, then, a bug with <2.19.55? I'll try upgrading and report >> back. >> >> Cheers, >> >> A >> > > Update: upgrading to 2.19.59 made the

Re: Weird lyric extender shortening

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 5:15 PM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > > Anyway, is this, then, a bug with <2.19.55? I'll try upgrading and report > back. > > Cheers, > > A > Update: upgrading to 2.19.59 made the problem go away. Thanks David Kastrup! Cheers, A

Re: Weird lyric extender shortening

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 5:08 PM, David Wright wrote: > > > > > What might be causing this behavior? > > That's quite a MWE! Anyway, I get good extenders in your posted > source, and when I comment out > \global \KlavierMusicUpper crap, sorry. The material to comment

Re: Weird lyric extender shortening

On Fri 05 May 2017 at 16:41:04 (+0200), N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > Here's the problem: if I comment out the music for the piano in the upper > staff of bar 17, the lyric extender in the voice part goes all the way to > bar 18 like it should. But with that music there, the extender line from > the

Re: Weird lyric extender shortening

"N. Andrew Walsh" writes: > Hi List, > > so, I have the following in a larger piece: > > > \version "2.19.55" Use 2.19.58 or later. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Weird lyric extender shortening

Hi List, so, I have the following in a larger piece: \version "2.19.55" global= { \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/4) \set Timing.beatStructure = #'(1 1 1) \set Timing.beamExceptions = #'() \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-numbers \time 4/8 \key f \minor

Re: Apple stealing "Lily"

H. S. Teoh: > Honestly, I think the idea that Apple is trying to push free/libre > software out of the market is complete hooey. Even in the case that a company/group unintentionally uses the same branding (name, logo, etc) as an existing organization/company/product, it still benefits the

Re: Dotted lyric extenders

Thanks for the advice and especially for the detailed override description! I just added a feature request to the bug list. Philip -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dotted-lyric-extenders-tp202917p202934.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at

Re: Apple stealing "Lily"

Sven Axelsson: > Honestly, I don't understand what Apple has to do with this? The Lily > app is developed by a small UK-based company called Pelican 7. You are right, I was a little sloppy to write "Apple" specifically. In this case it would not be Apple Inc's responsibility.

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

On 4-5-2017 23:29, Simon Albrecht wrote: Am 04.05.2017 um 22:20 schrieb Partitura Organum: I have linux running as an app on my tablet, That sounds great – how does one do that? Best, Simon I use an app called "Linux Deploy" for that. That app installs Linux and is later used to run the

\magnifyStaff for a staff group?

Hello all, Please consider the following snippet, the first part of which works as expected and the second part of which fails: %% SNIPPET BEGINS \version "2.19.59" \score { << \new Staff c''1 \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #5/7 } c''1 \new Staff

Re: Doing some strange stuff with multi-measure rests

Hi, here are some hints, how might tweak the output: \new RhythmicStaff { b'1 | \afterGrace { % we place the drum-roll on a grace position % override the stencil for the MultiMeasure stencil \once \override MultiMeasureRest.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (let ((stil

Re: Mark formatting problem

Hello Malte, I hadn’t thought of an explictit \box, thanks for the hint! JM > Le 5 mai 2017 à 10:41, Malte Meyn a écrit : > > > > Am 05.05.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Menu Jacques: >> Hello folks, >> >> Mark « B » in the following is not placed in a box, like the others.

Re: Apple stealing "Lily"

That's right. My PhD supervisor was a consultant for one of the Apples (don't remember which one :) ) Apple was only allowed to use Apple Corps trademark and branding if they didn't participate in the "Music" (i.e. recording) industry. Hmmm... On Friday, 5 May 2017 08:50:39 BST Robert Schmaus

Re: Mark formatting problem

Am 05.05.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Menu Jacques: > Hello folks, > > Mark « B » in the following is not placed in a box, like the others. > > Thanks for your help! > > JM > > — > > \version "2.19.55" > > \relative c'' { >\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-alphabet >c1

Mark formatting problem

Hello folks, Mark « B » in the following is not placed in a box, like the others. Thanks for your help! JM — \version "2.19.55" \relative c'' { \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-alphabet c1 \mark \default c1 \mark "B" c1 \mark #8 c1 \mark \default

Doing some strange stuff with multi-measure rests

Basically, I want to show a rest with indeterminate length for all parts, except the drumset, which is to make undefined creepy noises, and the cymbal, which should do a drumroll-crescendo (not sure if there's any fancy name for that) before the rest of the parts resume playing. I've attached

Re: Dotted lyric extenders

2017-05-05 2:58 GMT+02:00 pmtanx : > Hello! I am a relatively new Lilypond user and have been greatly enjoying the > program. I would appreciate the capability of creating dotted rather than > solid lyric extender lines, and am wondering whether this is possible (and > how to

Re: Apple stealing "Lily"

On 5 May 2017, at 07:35, Michael Gerdau wrote: > Anybody remembering apple sueing apple records for trademark infringement? Also, if I recall correctly, the lawsuit wasn't about trademark infringement at all. I think Apple Corps had an understanding with the newly founded Apple

Re: Apple stealing "Lily"

Michael Gerdau writes: >>> And none of this is really relevant here on the Lilypond mailing list >>> anyway. Since when did Lilypond hold exclusive trademarks over every >>> English word that may or may not have been derived from "lily", and >>> what does this even have to do with