Re: Fwd: ghostscript fails on pdf generation

On Thu 08 Jun 2017 at 06:08:07 (+0200), N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > Hi David, > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:37 AM, David Wright > wrote: > > > > > Just to clarify, is this > > …lilypond-2.19.61/bin/lilypond > > > > That one ↑ Good. > > or > >

Re: Fwd: ghostscript fails on pdf generation

Hi David, On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:37 AM, David Wright wrote: > > Just to clarify, is this > …lilypond-2.19.61/bin/lilypond > That one ↑ or > …lilypond-2.19.61/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond > > > > Maybe if it is only calling "lilypond" (i.e. without an absolute path >

Re: Fwd: ghostscript fails on pdf generation

On Wed 07 Jun 2017 at 17:50:52 (+0200), N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > > > How exactly is LilyPond registered in Frescobaldi for you? > > > > Absolute path to the binary installed with the package. Just to clarify, is this

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Hi Simon, > You mean one command for use in markup and music? That’s not possible, > because markup commands have a different namespace in that \huge is > translated to #:huge in the Scheme ‘markup’ macro, which is then translated > to make-huge-markup. (Which is also why define-markup-command

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

On 07.06.2017 19:44, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Is it*really* not possible to have just one "huge" command, which is used wherever "\huge" makes sense? You mean one command for use in markup and music? That’s not possible, because markup commands have a different namespace in that \huge is

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Hi David, > This isn't the \huge you are using in markups. Oy. 1. Thanks for clearing that up. I'll see where that leads me. 2. Is it *really* not possible to have just one "huge" command, which is used wherever "\huge" makes sense? In the 20 years I've programmed (in different languages and

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > > The docs (1.8.2 Formatting text) say > >>> Known issues and warnings >>> Using the font sizing commands \teeny, \tiny, \small, \normalsize, >>> \large, and \huge will lead to inconsistent line spacing compared >>> to using

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Hi David, Thanks for the quick response. >> Is there an equivalent command for baseline-skip? >> I know about \override #'(baseline-skip . 13), but I believe that's >> only for overriding the "current" markup? > > { > c1-\markup \column { a b c } > \override TextScript.baseline-skip = #20 >

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Hi David, The docs (1.8.2 Formatting text) say >> Known issues and warnings >> Using the font sizing commands \teeny, \tiny, \small, \normalsize, \large, >> and \huge will lead to inconsistent line spacing compared to using \fontsize. I'm trying to get my head around the various situations

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > > Thanks for the quick response. > >>> Is there an equivalent command for baseline-skip? >>> I know about \override #'(baseline-skip . 13), but I believe that's >>> only for overriding the "current" markup? >> >> { >>

Re: setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hello all, > > If I want to change the font size of all markup "from this point on", I can > use > >\set fontSize = #5 > > Is there an equivalent command for baseline-skip? > I know about \override #'(baseline-skip . 13), but I

Re: NR 1.7.2 - snippet "Analysis brackets with labels"

Il giorno mer 7 giu 2017 alle 17:53, David Nalesnik ha scritto: On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Another question: why the markups added using "\tweak text" are not printed? (bars 2, 3 and 4) A change was

Re: NR 1.7.2 - snippet "Analysis brackets with labels"

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: > Can you please clarify the last sentence of this snippet: > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/outside-the-staff.html#analysis-brackets > > > \layout { > \context { >\Voice >\consists

setting baseline-skip "from this point on"

Hello all, If I want to change the font size of all markup "from this point on", I can use \set fontSize = #5 Is there an equivalent command for baseline-skip? I know about \override #'(baseline-skip . 13), but I believe that's only for overriding the "current" markup? Thanks, Kieren.

Fwd: ghostscript fails on pdf generation

Whoops. Forgot to send to the whole list. Also, update: PyQt5.QtWebKitWidgets is deprecated in Qt5.5, removed as of Qt5.6. The new hotness is PyQt5.QtWebEngineWidgets. See here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37876987/cannot-import-qtwebkitwidgets-in-pyqt5 Should I just rewrite the calling

NR 1.7.2 - snippet "Analysis brackets with labels"

Can you please clarify the last sentence of this snippet: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/outside-the-staff.html#analysis-brackets \layout { \context { \Voice \consists "Horizontal_bracket_engraver" \override HorizontalBracket.direction = #UP } } {

Re: ghostscript fails on pdf generation

Am 07.06.2017 um 15:54 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh: > Hi List, > > this error has cropped up again for me. I'll summarize briefly: > > compiling a document within frescobaldi (3.0.0) and lilypond-2.19.61 > fails with gs error 256. However, this only fails on my laptop, not my > main machine (which

Re: ghostscript fails on pdf generation

Hi List, this error has cropped up again for me. I'll summarize briefly: compiling a document within frescobaldi (3.0.0) and lilypond-2.19.61 fails with gs error 256. However, this only fails on my laptop, not my main machine (which is running the same versions). running the failing gs command

Re: partcombine and quote don't play well together

Hi Karlin, Thanks for your response. > I use the part combiner in every project I do. That's great to hear. > As far as helping with such a project, my experience with LilyPond > amounts to only a year or so. Every little bit helps. > I know nothing at all about Scheme-family languages, >

Re: partcombine and quote don't play well together

Hi David, > Nevertheless I am really at a loss of what "working with > you towards a really great partcombiner" is supposed to mean. I'm sorry you're at a loss. Hopefully things will become clearer to you as time goes on. > What is the kind of work you are envisioning for yourself here?

Re: partcombine and quote don't play well together

Kieren MacMillan writes: > 3. I have always been, and continue to be, happy to sponsor > infrastructure improvements. That being said: (a) I am in no financial > position to offer a monthly amount of any significance; and (b) nobody > has ever asked me to sponsor

Re: Forcing line breaks without changing bar lines

Thanks! It works perfectly :) On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 at 01:57 David Kastrup wrote: > Li Jie Wong writes: > > > Is it possible to make a function that will do the equivalent of... > > > > \break > > > > when at a bar boundary, and > > > > \bar "" \break > > >

Re: partcombine and quote don't play well together

Judicious use of \partcombineUnisono and \undo of same might help with quoting combined with \partcombine. E.g. where you start quoting, you can try to specify \partcombineUnisono etc. Rutger On 06/06/2017 05:22 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hello all, The snippet below contains a [M]WE

Re: Multiple exercises on a single line

Thanks David and Malte they both work perfectly for me! I'm sure they will be useful also to other. g. On 7 June 2017 at 09:15, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > > > I would like to write short exercises of one measure consecutively on

Re: Multiple exercises on a single line

Now that’s great, thanks David! JM > Le 7 juin 2017 à 09:15, David Kastrup a écrit : > > Gianmaria Lari writes: > >> I would like to write short exercises of one measure consecutively on the >> same line. Something similar to what I attached. How I can

Re: Multiple exercises on a single line

Gianmaria Lari writes: > I would like to write short exercises of one measure consecutively on the > same line. Something similar to what I attached. How I can do it? You could try something along the following lines: exercises = #(define-scheme-function (cm seq)

Re: Multiple exercises on a single line

Am 07.06.2017 um 08:31 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: I would like to write short exercises of one measure consecutively on the same line. Something similar to what I attached. How I can do it? How about this? You can put \scores in \markups and use things like \column, \fill-line, \table. The

Multiple exercises on a single line

I would like to write short exercises of one measure consecutively on the same line. Something similar to what I attached. How I can do it? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org