Agreed about the optical spacing. My goal was to get the alignment to be
identical between the bare dynamics and the dynamics + text. To my eye, the
fff and fff espressivo are aligned the same, so it seems more like something
that could be improved in Lilypond's dynamic alignment in general.
I
Hi Shevek,
> Here is a snippet I've written to align custom dynamics correctly.
This is a nice start — thanks!
Two thoughts:
1. To my eye, the f's don't seem centred (the fff shows the "error" more
prominently than the f". I realise this is an optical illusion based on the
actual
Dynamics with expressive text, like "p espressivo" are meant to have the
dynamic aligned on the notehead the same as ordinary dynamics, with the
expressive text following. Here is a snippet I've written to align custom
dynamics correctly.
\version "2.18.2"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##f
indent
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:23:49 +1000, Vaughan McAlley
wrote:
> I’ve put version 0.941beta up which fixes the issue of custom layouts not
> working and adds a Denemo layout option.
Thanks.
One thing: When I run lq, I still have to (manually) connnect its 'Virtual
RawMIDI '
Hi,
I just re-read the code and comments, and it seems configuring lilyquick
works a little different. It looks to me that this is done from the
function InitSetNoteLengths(). I'd rather enter my own list of
valuemappings in a simple table. I only have to do that once, and
LilyQuick
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
I developed the layout myself using the Finale Speedy Note Entry as a base,
which was:
8 - \breve
7 - 1
6 - 2
5 - 4
4 - 8
3 - 16
2 - 32
1 - 64
This also corresponds with the keyboard shortcuts for note durations when
entering notes in MuseScore.