Re: Reduce PianoStaves for rest

Simon Albrecht writes: > \new PianoStaff \with { \remove Keep_alive_together_engraver } << >   \new Staff {} >   \new Staff \with { \RemoveAllEmptyStaves } {} >>> Easier to just use \new GrandStaff << ... >> The only difference is the Keep_alive_together_engraver if I

Re: Reduce PianoStaves for rest

On 21.12.2017 22:45, Robert Schmaus wrote: Not sure if I understand you correctly, but is this what you're looking for? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/writing-rests#full-measure-rests No, that’s not what the question was about. Helge is working on a harp part, and he

Re: Reduce PianoStaves for rest

Not sure if I understand you correctly, but is this what you're looking for? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/writing-rests#full-measure-rests > On 21 Dec 2017, at 19:20, Helge Kruse wrote: > > I have a score for an orchestra instrument (harp). The

Re: Beam question

Original thought: [d g d g] (wound up trying to attach a beam to a quarter rest...) Improved: d [g d g] Correct: d[ g d g] Mike Dean On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Mike Dean wrote: > Thanks, Simon! > Not much of an improvement from my original thought of putting square

Re: Beam question

Thanks, Simon! Not much of an improvement from my original thought of putting square brackets around the group of notes, but it got me closer to the truth Mike Dean On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 21.12.2017 19:38, Mike Dean wrote: > >>

Re: Beam question

On 21.12.2017 19:38, Mike Dean wrote: (Thought: would putting square braces around the last three do it? That isn’t the right way to think of it. The [] aren’t placed _around_ the notes they apply to, but rather attached to the first and last notes as _post events_ (just like slurs, ties,

Re: Beam question

On 12/21/2017 1:38 PM, Mike Dean wrote: Inline image 1 Well, here's hoping that this will clarify... The simultaneous voice ends on beat 2 in the left hand, and it's those four eighth notes I desire to beam (Thought: would putting square braces around the last three do it? Yes, now it is

Re: Beam question

On 12/21/2017 1:38 PM, Mike Dean wrote: Inline image 1 Well, here's hoping that this will clarify... The simultaneous voice ends on beat 2 in the left hand, and it's those four eighth notes I desire to beam (Thought: would putting square braces around the last three do it? Yes, now it is

Re:\magnifyStaff for dynamics?

Resending this with the correct subject line. Thanks for your response. For dynamics within the staff that isn't necessary, as \magnifyStaff works fine. \version "2.19.63" \score { << \new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #(magstep -2) } \relative c' { c\p\< c c c\f } >> } The issue is

Re: Beam question

[image: Inline image 1] Well, here's hoping that this will clarify... The simultaneous voice ends on beat 2 in the left hand, and it's those four eighth notes I desire to beam (Thought: would putting square braces around the last three do it? Yes, now it is clearin reading the section I didn't

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 181, Issue 111

Thanks for your response. For dynamics within the staff that isn't necessary, as \magnifyStaff works fine. \version "2.19.63" \score { << \new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #(magstep -2) } \relative c' { c\p\< c c c\f } >> } The issue is changing the size of a separate dynamics staff.

Re: Beam question

On 12/21/2017 1:16 PM, Mike Dean wrote: Ben: That serves me right for ripping a text out of context and forgetting to put an "8" after the first note in the snippet... \version "2.19.80" \language "english"   \clef treble   \key c \major *\time 3/4* << { d,8 g d g fs a | d, g d g }    \\    

Reduce PianoStaves for rest

I have a score for an orchestra instrument (harp). The harp starts after tens of measures. There are several meter changes. Therfore a simple multi-measure-rest is inappropriate. Instead I would like to write all measures and meter changes, so that the harpist can follow the music and get the

Re: Beam question

Ben: That serves me right for ripping a text out of context and forgetting to put an "8" after the first note in the snippet... \version "2.19.80" \language "english" \clef treble \key c \major *\time 3/4* << { d,8 g d g fs a | d, g d g } \\ { q | q }>> Mike Dean On Thu,

Re: Beam question

On 12/21/2017 1:05 PM, Mike Dean wrote: In a piece with a double backslash to denote voices   \clef treble   \key c \major   \time 3/4 << { d, g d g fs a | d, g d g }        \\        { q | q }>> The construct  ends after beat 2, leaving the four eighth notes unbeamed. is there something in

Beam question

In a piece with a double backslash to denote voices \clef treble \key c \major \time 3/4 << { d, g d g fs a | d, g d g } \\ { q | q }>> The construct ends after beat 2, leaving the four eighth notes unbeamed. is there something in the manual beaming syntax that I can use

Re: retrying in and out polyphony

Carl: Thanks! I finished the engraving of the piano score of "Jesus Paid It All", although I still haven't solved starting and ending hairpins in simultaneous voices as of yet (I think that it may not start outside of of such a section and end inside it) Mike Dean On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at

Ligatures question

Hello folks, MusicXMl has the notion of brackets (LilyPond’s ligatures) line-ends:

Re: Required font for simplified Chinese characters?

Andrew Bernard writes: > HI Phil, > > It's still very confusing for people, I claim. This landscape business > having two modes is unique to lilypond, I think, so people will stumble > over it for a long time to come. Because it is unfamiliar behaviour, people > will

Re: Required font for simplified Chinese characters?

HI Phil, It's still very confusing for people, I claim. This landscape business having two modes is unique to lilypond, I think, so people will stumble over it for a long time to come. Because it is unfamiliar behaviour, people will not be reading manuals looking for unusual behaviour. Andrew

Re: Required font for simplified Chinese characters?

- Original Message - From: "James Harkins" To: "Andrew Bernard" ; "lilypond-user" Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Required font for simplified Chinese characters? On Sat, 09 Dec 2017