Re: [OT] was Re: Rational

Karlin High writes: > On 5/23/2018 9:21 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >>> Yes, due to an integer overflow bug, Gandhi's initially hard-coded >> aggression value of 1 could end up being lowered such that it >> wrapped around to 255. And then nukes. >> >> BWAHAHAHAHA! =) >>

Re: Website down?

Ok thanks Aaron :-) Brent. On 24 May 2018 at 15:16, Aaron Hill wrote: > On 2018-05-23 21:40, Brent Annable wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> Is the Lilypond website down right now? I can't access lilypond.org, the >> manual or the internals reference from either my laptop or

Re: Website down?

On 2018-05-23 21:40, Brent Annable wrote: Hey all, Is the Lilypond website down right now? I can't access lilypond.org, the manual or the internals reference from either my laptop or my phone, I get the following message: Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or

Re: Simple solution for combining an odd number of parts

crimsonsunr...@protonmail.com writes: > Setting all parts as parallel generates a lot of clashing note > errors. Are you using separate Voice contexts with differe \voiceXXX orientation? > Is there an easier way of dealing with this issue apart from waiting > for 2.19? I don't think that would

Re: Lilypond and Frescobaldi on Fedora 28

Hi Martin This has been fixed now, right? (I haven't upgraded to 28 yet) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568274 Il giorno dom 6 mag 2018 alle 12:10, Martin Tarenskeen <"m.tarenskeen"@zonnet.nl> ha scritto: Hi, Official Fedora 28 version of lilypond 2.19.81 is currently

Website down?

Hey all, Is the Lilypond website down right now? I can't access lilypond.org, the manual or the internals reference from either my laptop or my phone, I get the following message: Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your

Re: Simple solution for combining an odd number of parts

On 5/23/2018 10:29 PM, crimsonsunr...@protonmail.com wrote: I have no idea what to do, other than give up on attempting to make the score look like the original Missed on first reading, sorry. This is a transcription project? Any chance of including a scanned image with some portion of the

Re: Simple solution for combining an odd number of parts

On 5/23/2018 10:29 PM, crimsonsunr...@protonmail.com wrote: Is there an easier way of dealing with this issue apart from waiting for 2.19? Tiny examples get better help. Just to start the process: % BEGIN LILYPOND CODE \version "2.19.80" trOne = {

Re: Simple solution for combining an odd number of parts

Why wait for 2.19? It's been stable for a long time. You would be unlikely to encounter bugs. [Every time I encourage this people jump in a point out all the reasons why not to use it, but I hammer it hard all day with really complex scores and have no issues. I think it's wonderful.] It's

Simple solution for combining an odd number of parts

I'm currently work on reformatting a piece which has many of its instruments combined into a single staff in the conductor score. Problem is, at least two groups of instruments (trumpet and clarinet) are grouped in three, with parts that are played by 1,2 and 2,3, as well as parts that are only

Re: [OT] was Re: Rational

On 5/23/2018 9:21 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Yes, due to an integer overflow bug, Gandhi's initially hard-coded aggression value of 1 could end up being lowered such that it wrapped around to 255. And then nukes. BWAHAHAHAHA! =) K. Same here. :) A reference to the "Sid Meier's

Re: [OT] was Re: Rational

> Yes, due to an integer overflow bug, Gandhi's initially hard-coded aggression > value of 1 could end up being lowered such that it wrapped around to 255. > And then nukes. BWAHAHAHAHA! =) K. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣

Re: [OT] was Re: Rational

On 2018-05-23 19:06, Kieren MacMillan wrote: . . . [sic] Ghandi had *many* rather shocking flaws . . . Yes, due to an integer overflow bug, Gandhi's initially hard-coded aggression value of 1 could end up being lowered such that it wrapped around to 255. And then nukes. -- Aaron Hill

Re: [OT] was Re: Rational

Also is a good video to add perspective to the conversation. Kieren. > On May 23, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > > Hi Karlin, > >> I'm not Roman Catholic and never studied Mother Teresa's life, but I think >>

Re: [OT] was Re: Rational

Hi Karlin, > I'm not Roman Catholic and never studied Mother Teresa's life, but I think > they're approaching Job's-accuser level there. (Someone is GOOD? NO WAY! > Can't stand that, must do immediate tear-down.) There have been concerns about her manufactured image, going back decades and

Re: [OT] was Re: Rational

On 5/23/2018 8:44 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Meh… Mother Teresa was no saint.;) /Copies linked article to OneNote/ Thanks, I had that one dimly in memory but

[OT] was Re: Rational

Hi Karlin, >> Could you please remind me where I remarked that? > Possibly this one. > Thanks for the link. > NOT noviciacy with Mother Teresa's order, I assume Meh… Mother Teresa was no saint. ;)

Re: Rational

On 5/23/2018 7:20 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi, Let's assume that I'm a moron with a room-temperature IQ and, as our friend Kieran McMullen I assume you mean me, Kieren MacMillan? has remarked, "You have no idea what you're talking about." Could you please remind me where I remarked

Re: Adding a continuous drone to midi output

Karlin High writes: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:05 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Sigh. Added basic documentation and harmonized the functionality. > > (APPLAUSE) > > Does this get a changes entry? It might. It's not really Earth shaking functionality, to be

Re: Adding a continuous drone to midi output

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:05 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Sigh. Added basic documentation and harmonized the functionality. (APPLAUSE) Does this get a changes entry? -- Karlin High Missouri, USA ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Adding a continuous drone to midi output

David Kastrup writes: > Karlin High writes: > >> On 5/22/2018 3:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Turns out that I don't have a good idea where to document this in the >>> manuals. >> >> You've already considered this one? >> >>

Re: naming a glyph

On 2018-05-23 13:25, Freeman Gilmore wrote: The ez way is to picture a peace of music with accidentals then replace them with microtonal accidentals, but of a different design than what is out there. I have several ideas for the design of each glyph, I know what I want them to abdicate, and

Re: Lilypond.org is down

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Sven Axelsson wrote: > Getting 500-errors for all pages on the lilypond site. Anyone know what's > going on? No idea what's going on. But until the server problems resolve, most info on the site should be available via archive.org

Re: naming a glyph

​Jacques: The ez way is to picture a peace of music with accidentals then replace them with microtonal accidentals, but of a different design than what is out there. I have several ideas for the design of each glyph, I know what I want them to abdicate, and I want them to be more intuitive (no

Re: spacing of gracenote beams

Thorsten, You're the best. This works beautifully. I've been able to not only fix the grip but also the b and c doublings and the taorluath as well. Thanks so much, once I get all the embellishments the way I want them, then I will send out a revised bagpipe.ly to folks. Amy On Sat, May 19,

Re: naming a glyph

James: I have read this before. I was thinking that if I place the ​accidentals in SMuFL local font file I could call them from there using the example form the article.At this point I only have some ideas about the way the accidentals should look. I need to know how Lilypond handles

Re: Lilypond.org is down

Me too - I received an "Internal Server Error" message from Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) Server at lilypond.org Port 80 Karen On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 10:32 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:50:34PM +0100, Sven Axelsson wrote: >    Getting

Re: Lilypond.org is down

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:50:34PM +0100, Sven Axelsson wrote: >Getting 500-errors for all pages on the lilypond site. Anyone know >what's going on? [...] No idea. I'm getting 500 errors too. :-( --T ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Lilypond.org is down

Getting 500-errors for all pages on the lilypond site. Anyone know what's going on? Sven Axelsson -- ++[>++>+++>++>++ ><-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<. +++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++..>>.<.