Hi lilyponders,
In the following MWE I get this error: *omitting tuplet bracket with
neither left nor right bound*
The compilation is fine. Anything I should do about this error?
Thanks,
Craig
\version "2.19.82"
\language "english"
flute = \relative c'' {
\tuplet 3/2 4 {
g2.:8
> On 23 Aug 2018, at 23:26, David Wright wrote:
>
> On Thu 23 Aug 2018 at 21:47:51 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
GCC works like with PATH, using first occurrence only. So the compiler
system files can be overridden that way.
>>>
>>> Yes, but the preprocessor can distinguish the
On Thu 23 Aug 2018 at 21:47:51 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 23 Aug 2018, at 21:12, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > On Thu 16 Aug 2018 at 22:55:29 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
> >>> On 16 Aug 2018, at 22:35, David Wright wrote:
> >>>
> There I would expect -I to be put ahead of the
On 8/23/2018 4:57 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Urs mentions encryption being used by CodaMusic (I've never heard
of them) and that clearly shows an intention of lock-in. OTOH Wols
doesn't lay out here the evidence of the reported intent of Word's
changes. (Actually, I thought it was an open format
Am 23. August 2018 22:27:33 MESZ schrieb Ben :
>On 8/23/2018 4:21 PM, David Wright wrote:
>> On Sat 18 Aug 2018 at 22:18:51 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
>>> David Wright writes:
>>>
On Sat 18 Aug 2018 at 19:55:01 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> On 18/08/18 12:51, David Kastrup wrote:
On 8/23/2018 4:21 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 18 Aug 2018 at 22:18:51 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
David Wright writes:
On Sat 18 Aug 2018 at 19:55:01 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
On 18/08/18 12:51, David Kastrup wrote:
Indeed, that wasn't expressed too well. What I meant is that
On Sat 18 Aug 2018 at 22:18:51 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> David Wright writes:
>
> > On Sat 18 Aug 2018 at 19:55:01 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> >> On 18/08/18 12:51, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> >> Indeed, that wasn't expressed too well. What I meant is that
> >> >> > CodaMusic's policy to
> On 23 Aug 2018, at 21:12, David Wright wrote:
>
> On Thu 16 Aug 2018 at 22:55:29 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> On 16 Aug 2018, at 22:35, David Wright wrote:
>>>
There I would expect -I to be put ahead of the program system directories,
so those latter can be overridden. I think
On Thu 16 Aug 2018 at 22:55:29 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 16 Aug 2018, at 22:35, David Wright wrote:
> >
> >> There I would expect -I to be put ahead of the program system directories,
> >> so those latter can be overridden. I think GCC in the past may have had
> >> another behavior,
Thanks,
I did try that directive, but it seems to not keep my proportional notation.
Is that by design?
-Michael
On 8/23/18 6:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Winter writes:
Hello,
Is it possible to start engraving at a specified measure or to omit
the first x measure.
Note that I am
Michael Winter writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to start engraving at a specified measure or to omit
> the first x measure.
>
> Note that I am not trying to create a fragment here. I just want to
> drop x given empty measures at the beginning of a particular staff
> (without removing empty
Hello,
Is it possible to start engraving at a specified measure or to omit the
first x measure.
Note that I am not trying to create a fragment here. I just want to drop
x given empty measures at the beginning of a particular staff (without
removing empty staves past a certain point).
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
