On Tue 25 Sep 2018 at 14:34:37 (+0200), 70147pers...@telia.com wrote:
> On 2018-09-24 at 01:02, David Wright wrote:
> > That's adds a lot of complexity. I prefer a simpler approach:
> >
> > %%
> > \version "2.18.2"
> >
> > A = \relative g' { g2 g( g g) g g g g }
> > n = \lyricmode { "" }
> >
>
On 10/3/18 7:09 PM, Kevin Barry wrote:
lualatex lyluatest.ly --shell-escape
That's the wrong order. Options come before the file name.
--
✝✝
Br. Samuel, OSB
(R. Padraic Springuel)
St. Anselm’s Abbey
4501 South Dakota Ave, NE
Washington, DC, 20017
202-269-2300
(c)
Hi All,
I'm having trouble getting lyluatex to find lilypond. Even specifying
the program location and running lualatex with --shell-escape results
in "LilyPond could not be started".
The OS is Fedora 28 and the lilypond version is the one provided by
the package manager (currently 2.19.82) and
Sorry to hijack this, but is there a place to ask for help with lyluatex? I
am having trouble with it (in short, even specifying the program location
and running lualatex with --escape-shell results in a failure to start
lilypond.) I don't see that there is a mailing list or anything. I presume
Am 04.10.2018 um 00:44 schrieb Kevin Barry:
Sorry to hijack this, but is there a place to ask for help with
lyluatex? I am having trouble with it (in short, even specifying the
program location and running lualatex with --escape-shell results in a
failure to start lilypond.) I don't see that
Robin Bannister-2 wrote
> Well there was a suggestion in 2012
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-02/msg00417.html
> I don't know if anything came of this.
Thanks. It took me a while to get around to it,
but I tried the Scheme solution from Francisco Vila(?) and it worked.
> However, I would suggest you have a look at the lyluatex package
Actually I am aware of lyluatex but I haven’t tried it yet, lately I have been
very busy. Surely I’ll give it a try.
Thanks again
ciao
Francesco Napoleoni
___
lilypond-user mailing
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> It was an observation, not a proposal.
>>> Speaking only for myself, I can perfectly life without the
>>> comma-syntax in definitions and their calls.
>>
>> It feels weird in definitions. Don't remember whether
Maarten Deen writes:
> On 2018-10-03 10:13, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Maarten Deen writes:
>
>>> But the solution offered by Kieren did not work in 2.16.2 (didn't test
>>> other versions).
>>
>> 2.16.2 is, like, really old. Released more than 5 years ago. If you
>> are doing typesetting of new
On 2018-10-03 10:13, David Kastrup wrote:
Maarten Deen writes:
But the solution offered by Kieren did not work in 2.16.2 (didn't test
other versions).
2.16.2 is, like, really old. Released more than 5 years ago. If you
are doing typesetting of new scores, there is really not much of a
Maarten Deen writes:
> On 2018-10-02 22:56, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>>
>>> Hi Harm,
>>>
val = "foo"
<<
\new Staff \repeat unfold 4 c'4
\new Lyrics \lyricmode { \val4 \val2 \val4 }
\new Lyrics \lyricmode { \val4 \val4 \val2 }
>>
On 2018-10-02 22:56, David Kastrup wrote:
Kieren MacMillan writes:
Hi Harm,
val = "foo"
<<
\new Staff \repeat unfold 4 c'4
\new Lyrics \lyricmode { \val4 \val2 \val4 }
\new Lyrics \lyricmode { \val4 \val4 \val2 }
Your proposal would make it impossible.
Thanks for the examples.
On 2018-10-02 18:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Maarten,
Why are there no numbers allowed in variable names?
\version "2.18.2"
"part1" = { c''4 4 4 4 }
\score {
\new Staff \"part1"
}
As for why you need the quotes… well, I’ll leave the explanation up to
more knowledgeable people than I.
13 matches
Mail list logo
