Continuing the work on my chantey songbook... http://music.maden.org/index.php?title=Spanish_Ladies_(New_England) >
has seven lines in the chorus, but two pairs are nearly identical. I’m
trying to set them as single lines, with splits as needed, resulting in
a staff with two lines most of the
Timothy,
Thank you, exactly what I wanted.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Timothy Lanfear
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 2:07 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: tie across voices
On 23/12/2018
Jay,
Beautiful, and it preserves the voice leading!
Thank you!
Mark
From: Jay Anderson [mailto:horndud...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 3:11 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: tie across voices
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen Mrotek
wrote:
> Please see attached snippet.
>
> In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
>
> I have looked at using transparent as given in
>
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
>
> yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest.
>
My
On 23/12/2018 21:35, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Hello,
Please see attached snippet.
In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
I have looked at using transparent as given in
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest.
Any suggestions would be
On 2018-12-23 1:35 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
I have looked at using transparent as given in
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
yet that would "collide" with the quarter rest.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
It's not
Hello,
Please see attached snippet.
In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
I have looked at using transparent as given in
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
yet that would "collide" with the quarter rest.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Mark
Il giorno dom 23 dic 2018 alle 11:57, Thomas Morley
ha scritto:
how comes you're using 2.18.2 with Ghostscript 9.26?
This ly-version is released with Ghostscript 8.70.
He's probably using a package installed from the repository instead of
lilypond.org installer.
Linux packagers try to
Federico Bruni writes:
> Hi folks
>
> I would expect -djob-count=2 to launch 2 processes which I should see
> in my system monitor, but I see only one lilypond instance. I'm
> missing something or what?
Have you specified more than one input file on the command line?
> I have a 2 core CPU (and
Il giorno dom 23 dic 2018 alle 17:25, Federico Bruni
ha scritto:
Hi folks
I would expect -djob-count=2 to launch 2 processes which I should see
in my system monitor, but I see only one lilypond instance. I'm
missing something or what?
I have a 2 core CPU (and 4 threads).
By the way,
Hi folks
I would expect -djob-count=2 to launch 2 processes which I should see
in my system monitor, but I see only one lilypond instance. I'm missing
something or what?
I have a 2 core CPU (and 4 threads).
By the way, when I build a project of mine which uses Meson/Ninja, I
see 4 lilypond
Il giorno sab 22 dic 2018 alle 16:58, Thomas Morley
ha scritto:
Am Sa., 22. Dez. 2018 um 12:10 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup
:
Thomas Morley writes:
> Am Sa., 22. Dez. 2018 um 02:46 Uhr schrieb Ben
:
>> Did you experience the same wait times?
>
> It lasted ~40minutes (I didn't
Am Fr., 21. Dez. 2018 um 17:54 Uhr schrieb Jogchum Reitsma
:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I use lilypond 2.18 on OpenSuse Tumbleweed (the rolling distro from Suse). On
> that combination, displaying chord names in .pdf-form gives error messages
> grom ghostscript (gs) in the transition from a .ps-file to a
13 matches
Mail list logo
