Re: Right way to make a function for a set of articulations on a note

2019-01-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Andrew, > I often need use a tenuoto with a parenthesised accent, but I only just > figured out how to achieve that. Now ti would be convenient have a function > of some sort as a shorthand. > > Is this the right way to do it that I came up with? I feel a bit > uncomfortable about the <>,

Right way to make a function for a set of articulations on a note

2019-01-15 Thread Andrew Bernard
I often need use a tenuoto with a parenthesised accent, but I only just figured out how to achieve that. Now ti would be convenient have a function of some sort as a shorthand. Is this the right way to do it that I came up with? I feel a bit uncomfortable about the <>, and maybe this should be

Re: System spacing for Certain

2019-01-15 Thread Reggie
Andrew Bernard wrote > Hi Reggie, > > If I understand you aright, you want explicit positioning of a system. > This > is in the NR at Section 4.4.2 Explicit staff an system positions. > (2.19.82). > > Andrew > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list >

Re: System spacing for Certain

2019-01-15 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Reggie, If I understand you aright, you want explicit positioning of a system. This is in the NR at Section 4.4.2 Explicit staff an system positions. (2.19.82). Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-01-15 4:40 pm, Aaron Hill wrote: Here's an oddity: \version "2.19.82" test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?) #{ \book { \bookOutputSuffix $suffix \score { b'4 } } #} ) foo = \test "foo" bar = \test "bar" \foo \bar Oops. Probably shouldn't go around redefining

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mi., 16. Jan. 2019 um 00:14 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > Lukas-Fabian Moser writes: > > > Hi David, > >> \test apparently expects a string argument. > > > > Aaargh, sorry, stupid me, and stupid copy'n'paste error. So, another try: > > > > \version "2.19.82" > > > > test =

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Aaron Hill
Here's an oddity: \version "2.19.82" test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?) #{ \book { \bookOutputSuffix $suffix \score { b'4 } } #} ) foo = \test "foo" bar = \test "bar" \foo \bar This works. -- Aaron Hill ___ lilypond-user

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-01-15 4:11 pm, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi David, Does anybody have an idea what is supposed to distinguish a book from a bookpart outside of actual \book { \bookpart { ... } } usage? You can’t have multiple book parts in a single output file? That’s the way I understand it. Is

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> Does anybody have an idea what is supposed to distinguish >> a book from a bookpart outside of actual >> >> \book { >> \bookpart { ... } } >> >> usage? > > You can’t have multiple book parts in a single output file? > That’s the way I understand it.

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, > Does anybody have an idea what is supposed to distinguish > a book from a bookpart outside of actual > > \book { > \bookpart { ... } } > > usage? You can’t have multiple book parts in a single output file? That’s the way I understand it. K.

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes: >>> \version "2.19.82" >>> >>> test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?)  #{ >>>   \book { >>>     \bookOutputSuffix #suffix >>>     \score { >>>   d4 >>>     } >>>   } >>> #} ) >>> >>> \test "surname" >>> >>> (still) causes a "Bad expression type"

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
\version "2.19.82" test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?)  #{   \book {     \bookOutputSuffix #suffix     \score {   d4     }   } #} ) \test "surname" (still) causes a "Bad expression type" error. Ah, well. Turns out that copying the code for \xxx here where \xxx was

Re: select a note in a chord

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Valentin Villenave writes: > On 1/15/19, Davide Bonetti wrote: >> I modified >> (if (and (music-is-of-type? music 'event-chord) >> (> l n)) >> with >> (if (and (music-is-of-type? music 'event-chord) >> (>= l n)) > > Nice catch! I’ve updated the

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes: > Hi David, >> \test apparently expects a string argument. > > Aaargh, sorry, stupid me, and stupid copy'n'paste error. So, another try: > > \version "2.19.82" > > test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?)  #{ >   \book { >     \bookOutputSuffix #suffix >    

Re: select a note in a chord

2019-01-15 Thread Valentin Villenave
On 1/15/19, Davide Bonetti wrote: > I modified > (if (and (music-is-of-type? music 'event-chord) > (> l n)) > with > (if (and (music-is-of-type? music 'event-chord) > (>= l n)) Nice catch! I’ve updated the snippet as well. Additionally, beware

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi David, \test apparently expects a string argument. Aaargh, sorry, stupid me, and stupid copy'n'paste error. So, another try: \version "2.19.82" test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?)  #{   \book {     \bookOutputSuffix #suffix     \score {   d4     }   } #} ) \test

Re: Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes: > Folks, > > is it possible for a scheme function to return a whole \book ? > > test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?)  #{ >   \book { >     \bookOutputSuffix #suffix >     \score { >   d4 >     } >   } > #} ) > > \test > > causes a "Bad expression

Scheme function returning \book

2019-01-15 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Folks, is it possible for a scheme function to return a whole \book ? test = #(define-scheme-function (suffix) (string?)  #{   \book {     \bookOutputSuffix #suffix     \score {   d4     }   } #} ) \test causes a "Bad expression type" error. In

setting fretboard diagrams at the top of the page

2019-01-15 Thread Evan Levine
Good afternoon! I've got a few things I'm brewing right now, but the most pressing is that I'm looking to set all of the chord diagrams for a lead sheet at the top of the page under the title, and modify the spacing of the diagrams to be centered on the page and have padding between each

Re: System spacing for Certain

2019-01-15 Thread Reggie
Karlin High wrote > On 1/15/2019 10:46 AM, Reggie wrote: >> How can LilyPond allow me to adjust various spacing between systems in a >> piece without causing movement to any others > > The Joram Berger LilyPond spacing map often clarifies things for me: >

Re: System spacing for Certain

2019-01-15 Thread Karlin High
On 1/15/2019 10:46 AM, Reggie wrote: How can LilyPond allow me to adjust various spacing between systems in a piece without causing movement to any others The Joram Berger LilyPond spacing map often clarifies things for me: -- Karlin High

System spacing for Certain

2019-01-15 Thread Reggie
How can LilyPond allow me to adjust various spacing between systems in a piece without causing movement to any others since I already created staves correctly using override in with command? I am not undertanding. Somewhere in all my c's? \version "2.19.82" << \relative c' \new Staff {

Re: Increasing space between staves - how to?

2019-01-15 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 15.01.19 um 11:46 schrieb po_...@yahoo.fr: Hi, I have written a score with 4 staves (please see below) and I want to increase the space between the 3rd and the 4th stave, and *only* between the 3rd and the 4th stave. How could I do that ? Thanks. Hi, please always give a minimal

Increasing space between staves - how to?

2019-01-15 Thread po_ubl
Hi, I have written a score with 4 staves (please see below) and I want to increase the space between the 3rd and the 4th stave, and *only* between the 3rd and the 4th stave. How could I do that ? Thanks. \score { \new StaffGroup << \new Staff << \global \Clarino >> \new Staff << \global

Re: [newbie] Some \markup stuff

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> That's a lowercase math gamma. > > LOL > > Yes, I’m so used to using that in my number theory papers, I wasn’t > thinking about the OP’s likely use. Thanks for clarifying! ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος or "text first". -- David Kastrup

Re: select a note in a chord

2019-01-15 Thread Davide Bonetti
Hello! Il 15/01/2019 11:46, Davide Bonetti ha scritto: But I noticed that it doesn't work on the lowest pitch of a chord (drop 4 on a four note chord, drop 3 on a three note chord) I modified    (if (and (music-is-of-type? music 'event-chord)     (> l n)) with    (if

Re: [newbie] Some \markup stuff

2019-01-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Mark, On Jan 14, 2019, at 11:58 PM, Mark Probert wrote: > it comes out just the way I am after! Yay! Onward and upward. =) Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info

Re: [newbie] Some \markup stuff

2019-01-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, > That's a lowercase math gamma. LOL Yes, I’m so used to using that in my number theory papers, I wasn’t thinking about the OP’s likely use. Thanks for clarifying! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email:

Re: Ambitus per voice and Ez_numbers_engraver

2019-01-15 Thread Gloops
Thank you Harm! It's perfect ... Still sorry for my poor English, luckily the pictures spoke for me. Regards, Gilles -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: fingering color

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Gianmaria Lari writes: > First time I try to change color of lilypond elements. > > This is what I did to change fingering color: > > \version "2.19.82" > { c' \finger \markup { \with-color #red 1 }} > > Is there a better way? { c' -\tweak color #red -1 } -- David Kastrup

Re: fingering color

2019-01-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15.01.19 um 13:43 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: First time I try to change color of lilypond elements. This is what I did to change fingering color: \version "2.19.82" { c' \finger \markup { \with-color #red 1 }} {   \override Fingering.color = #red   c' -1 } Is there a better way?

fingering color

2019-01-15 Thread Gianmaria Lari
First time I try to change color of lilypond elements. This is what I did to change fingering color: \version "2.19.82" { c' \finger \markup { \with-color #red 1 }} Is there a better way? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: select a note in a chord

2019-01-15 Thread Davide Bonetti
Now it sorts the pitches too! It can be easily converted to transpose a pitch an octave up changing (ly:make-pitch -1 0) to (ly:make-pitch +1 0) But I noticed that it doesn't work on the lowest pitch of a chord (drop 4 on a four note chord, drop 3 on a three note chord) Cheers Davide Il

Re: Rakefile

2019-01-15 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Thanks Malte, much appreciated. On Mon., 14 Jan. 2019, 10:12 pm Malte Meyn > > Am 14.01.19 um 11:33 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: > > Hi lilyponders, > > > > Does anyone use a Rakefile for automating their lilypond engraving and > > would be willing to share an example file that I could follow? > >

Re: select a note in a chord

2019-01-15 Thread Valentin Villenave
On 1/15/19, Valentin Villenave wrote: > (It would be possible to first re-order the notes > automatically and then apply the transformation, but I’m too lazy to > add it right now :-) OK, here’s an improved version: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1082 Cheers, V.

Re: Appoggiatura slur not crossing beam

2019-01-15 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Mark and Aaron, thanks for your suggestions. I'll go with Aaron's because a) it does'n't rely on changing an unrelated element (the stem direction) and forces me to deviate from the source and b) because it seems to surgically remove the layout constraint that caused the issue. Thanks

Re: Emmentaler & friends

2019-01-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15.01.19 um 01:06 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi Massimiliano, Do use 2.19.82. Although it's modestly termed 'unstable', it is actually very very stable. This use of the term unstable is an open source development convention more than anything in the context of lilypond. The

Re: [newbie] Some \markup stuff

2019-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi Mark, > > [Welcome to the 'Pond!] > >> I want to get the verbb text to show as italic. > > The easiest way is probably: > > verbb = \lyricmode { > \override LyricText.font-shape = #'italic > ut re mi fa sol la > } > >> Second question: I want to replace the